Moderated Discussions

Expand Threads:
View Last:
Highlight Last:
Start New Thread
TopicPosted ByDate
Modern ILP limits and future hardwarejuanrga09/01/14 12:17 PM
  Modern ILP limits and future hardwareMark Roulo09/01/14 12:50 PM
  Modern ILP limits and future hardwareMaynard Handley09/01/14 01:07 PM
Estimated die of Haswell-18Cjokerman08/31/14 01:34 PM
  Estimated die of Haswell-18CAlberto09/01/14 01:02 PM
Call stack optimizationBen08/28/14 03:50 PM
  Call stack optimizationBen08/28/14 03:52 PM
  Call stack optimizationBen08/28/14 04:07 PM
  Call stack optimizationEduardoS08/28/14 05:00 PM
  Why not low level?ex-apple08/28/14 05:37 PM
    Why not low level?Howard Chu08/28/14 08:05 PM
      Why not low level?Michael S08/29/14 05:32 AM
        Why not low level?someone08/29/14 09:13 AM
          PDP-11, human brain etc..Michael S08/31/14 01:58 AM
        Why not low level?Howard Chu08/29/14 07:51 PM
          Why not low level?David Hess09/01/14 08:58 AM
            Why not low level?EduardoS09/01/14 04:02 PM
        Why not low level?Maxwell08/31/14 12:55 AM
          Why not low level?gallier209/01/14 01:06 AM
            Why not low level?EduardoS09/01/14 01:14 AM
              Why not low level?gallier209/01/14 01:31 AM
            Why not low level?Patrick Chase09/01/14 05:29 PM
  Call stack optimizationBrendan08/28/14 11:55 PM
    Call stack optimizationsomeone08/29/14 09:19 AM
      Call stack optimizationMark Roulo08/29/14 11:45 AM
        Call stack optimizationBrendan08/29/14 07:41 PM
        Call stack optimizationgallier209/01/14 01:12 AM
      Call stack optimizationMegol08/30/14 08:15 AM
        Call stack optimizationKlimax08/30/14 09:02 AM
          Call stack optimizationMegol08/30/14 11:48 AM
            Call stack optimizationEduardoS08/30/14 01:33 PM
              Call stack optimizationMegol08/31/14 10:06 AM
              Call stack optimizationDavid Hess09/01/14 09:22 AM
          Call stack optimizationJouni Osmala08/30/14 11:46 PM
            Call stack optimizationBrendan08/31/14 01:00 AM
              IBM HLAMark Roulo08/31/14 07:09 AM
        Call stack optimizationnone08/30/14 11:44 AM
« I prefer "exponential backoff"Ronald Maas08/27/14 08:56 PM
« I prefer "exponential backoff"Gabriele Svelto08/28/14 03:58 AM
« I prefer "exponential backoff"Alberto08/28/14 06:02 AM
« John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCMark Roulo08/28/14 07:56 AM
      Nice analysis, indeed ! (NT)TREZA08/28/14 01:07 PM
      John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCAnon08/30/14 01:31 AM
        John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCWilco08/30/14 05:14 AM
          John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCRonald Maas08/30/14 01:49 PM
            John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCLinus Torvalds08/30/14 03:50 PM
              John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCHoward Chu08/30/14 06:56 PM
                John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCPatrick Chase08/30/14 08:16 PM
              John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCRonald Maas08/31/14 08:18 AM
                John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCLinus Torvalds08/31/14 10:27 AM
                  Then why not sequential consistency?anon08/31/14 01:25 PM
                    Then why not sequential consistency?Linus Torvalds08/31/14 05:24 PM
                      Then why not sequential consistency?anon08/31/14 10:20 PM
                        Then why not sequential consistency?Linus Torvalds09/01/14 11:04 AM
                          Then why not sequential consistency?noname09/01/14 11:41 AM
                            Then why not sequential consistency?Linus Torvalds09/01/14 01:09 PM
                              Then why not sequential consistency?noname09/01/14 02:25 PM
                          Real-world Example of "issue" with weak memory orderineMark Roulo09/01/14 12:10 PM
                  John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCRonald Maas08/31/14 01:46 PM
                    John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCG. Gouvine08/31/14 02:23 PM
                      John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCRonald Maas09/01/14 10:11 AM
                    John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCMichael S08/31/14 03:22 PM
                      John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCanon09/01/14 04:45 AM
                  John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCMaynard Handley08/31/14 05:43 PM
                    John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCLinus Torvalds08/31/14 06:03 PM
                      John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCLinus Torvalds08/31/14 06:35 PM
                        John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCGabriele Svelto09/01/14 01:17 AM
                      John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCMaynard Handley08/31/14 08:42 PM
                        Transactional memory on SPARCMark Roulo08/31/14 09:20 PM
                          Transactional memory on SPARCMaynard Handley08/31/14 10:40 PM
                            Transactional memory on SPARCGabriele Svelto09/01/14 01:04 AM
                            Transactional memory on SPARCMark Roulo09/01/14 11:48 AM
                        John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCLinus Torvalds09/01/14 11:25 AM
                      John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCRonald Maas09/01/14 09:38 AM
                        Model and implementationDavid Kanter09/01/14 11:04 AM
                John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCdmcq08/31/14 03:21 PM
                  John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCLinus Torvalds08/31/14 05:33 PM
                    John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCLinus Torvalds08/31/14 05:37 PM
              John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCRicardo B08/31/14 11:10 AM
            John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCDavid Hess09/01/14 06:39 PM
        John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCGabriele Svelto08/30/14 05:43 AM
        John Mashey post on RISC vs CISCLinus Torvalds08/30/14 11:01 AM
« I prefer "exponential backoff"Linus Torvalds08/28/14 10:08 AM
      I prefer "exponential backoff"Ronald Maas08/28/14 06:04 PM
        I prefer "exponential backoff"Linus Torvalds08/29/14 11:38 AM
          I prefer "exponential backoff"Ronald Maas08/29/14 01:58 PM
          ARMv5/6/7/7s/8Doug S08/29/14 02:21 PM
          I prefer "exponential backoff"David Hess08/29/14 03:43 PM
            I prefer "exponential backoff"Linus Torvalds08/29/14 05:40 PM
              I prefer "exponential backoff"David Hess09/01/14 01:07 PM
      I prefer "exponential backoff"Brett08/28/14 06:24 PM
        I prefer "exponential backoff"Patrick Chase08/29/14 09:47 PM
          I prefer "exponential backoff"Eric Bron08/30/14 12:18 AM
          I prefer "exponential backoff"Maynard Handley08/30/14 10:33 AM
            I prefer "exponential backoff"Michael S08/30/14 05:29 PM
            I prefer "exponential backoff"Patrick Chase08/30/14 06:31 PM
              I prefer "exponential backoff"Howard Chu08/30/14 06:59 PM
                I prefer "exponential backoff"Patrick Chase08/30/14 08:00 PM
                  I prefer "exponential backoff"Howard Chu08/30/14 08:47 PM
                    I prefer "exponential backoff"Michael S08/31/14 02:24 AM
          I prefer "exponential backoff"David Hess09/01/14 01:14 PM
      Meta argument.Jouni Osmala08/28/14 11:08 PM
        Meta argument.Michael S08/29/14 07:09 AM
          Meta argument.Jouni Osmala08/29/14 08:22 AM
          Meta argument.Megol08/30/14 10:54 AM
« I prefer "exponential backoff"David Hess08/29/14 01:09 PM
« I prefer "exponential backoff"J. Random08/30/14 09:21 PM
« I prefer "exponential backoff"Patrick Chase08/27/14 11:50 PM
      I prefer "exponential backoff"Jouni Osmala08/28/14 12:12 AM
        I prefer "exponential backoff"Gabriele Svelto08/28/14 03:38 AM
        I think previous bans were based on IP address (NT)Paul A. Clayton08/28/14 07:29 AM
« some basic factsjuanrga08/29/14 10:16 AM
« A17 vs A15..Heikki Kultala08/27/14 10:19 PM
« Another University of Wisconsin team paperGabriele Svelto08/28/14 04:00 AM
« RISC-V is first and foremost a research/teaching ISAHoward Chu08/30/14 07:10 PM
« I can't tell you, but you can guessanon08/28/14 11:06 PM
« Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerMichael S08/28/14 02:27 AM
      Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerPatrick Chase08/29/14 01:04 AM
        Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerMichael S08/29/14 04:35 AM
          Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerWilco08/29/14 05:30 AM
            Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerMichael S08/29/14 05:56 AM
              Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerRicardo B08/29/14 10:23 AM
              Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerWilco08/29/14 04:43 PM
                Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerMichael S08/30/14 01:49 PM
                  Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerExophase08/30/14 08:45 PM
                    Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerMichael S08/31/14 02:10 AM
                  Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerWilco08/31/14 04:30 AM
                    Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerMichael S08/31/14 05:42 AM
                Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerMichael S08/30/14 02:04 PM
                  Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerWilco08/31/14 02:16 PM
            Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerjuanrga08/29/14 08:49 AM
          Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerPatrick Chase08/29/14 07:50 AM
« Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerjuanrga08/28/14 03:40 AM
      Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerAaron Spink08/28/14 05:12 AM
        Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerjuanrga08/28/14 07:08 AM
          Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerAaron Spink08/28/14 04:41 PM
            Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerjuanrga08/29/14 03:17 AM
              Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerAaron Spink08/29/14 03:25 AM
                Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerjuanrga08/29/14 05:11 AM
                  Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerMichael S08/29/14 06:04 AM
                    Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerjuanrga08/29/14 08:40 AM
                      Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerMichael S08/29/14 08:46 AM
                        Don't repeat Hans wrong slide againjuanrga08/29/14 10:07 AM
« Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerWilco08/28/14 04:54 AM
      Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerAaron Spink08/28/14 05:43 AM
        Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerGabriele Svelto08/29/14 06:03 AM
          Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerMichael S08/29/14 06:18 AM
            Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerGabriele Svelto08/29/14 08:27 AM
      Wildly incorrect A15 area, bad benchmarks, ??? powerAnnoy Mouse08/28/14 06:33 AM
« TrustzonePoindexter08/28/14 11:17 AM
« SIMD FTWanon08/28/14 08:11 AM
      SIMD is only for DLPNicolas Capens08/29/14 11:40 AM
« Scalar vs Vector SIMTNicolas Capens08/28/14 01:50 AM
      Scalar vs Vector SIMTEric Bron08/28/14 04:43 AM
        Scalar vs Vector SIMTSylvain Collange08/28/14 05:48 AM
          Scalar vs Vector SIMTEric Bron08/28/14 06:34 AM
            Scalar vs Vector SIMTSylvain Collange08/28/14 07:34 AM
              Scalar vs Vector SIMTEric Bron08/28/14 08:52 AM
                Scalar vs Vector SIMTSylvain Collange08/29/14 02:00 AM
                  Scalar vs Vector SIMTEric Bron08/29/14 03:47 AM
                    Scalar vs Vector SIMTSylvain Collange08/29/14 05:35 AM
                      Scalar vs Vector SIMTSylvain Collange08/29/14 05:38 AM
                        Scalar vs Vector SIMTEric Bron08/29/14 05:48 AM
                          Scalar vs Vector SIMTSylvain Collange08/29/14 06:24 AM
                            Scalar vs Vector SIMTEric Bron08/29/14 06:48 AM
                        Scalar vs Vector SIMTEric Bron08/29/14 05:53 AM
                      Scalar vs Vector SIMTEric Bron08/29/14 06:15 AM
« SIMT should be a priorityjuanrga08/28/14 12:31 PM
      Convergence by scaling downNicolas Capens08/29/14 11:58 AM
        Convergence by scaling downjuanrga08/31/14 02:57 PM
          Ideal SIMD widthNicolas Capens09/01/14 06:27 PM
« Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink08/27/14 11:22 PM
« Some new data to scrap overgallier208/28/14 02:26 AM
« Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink08/27/14 11:14 PM
« Some new data to scrap overgallier208/28/14 02:42 AM
      Some new data to scrap overWilco08/28/14 05:11 AM
« Some new data to scrap overAaron Spink08/28/14 12:04 AM
      Some new data to scrap overjuanrga08/28/14 06:57 AM
« Some new data to scrap overRicardo B08/29/14 09:14 AM
« cheap membarsdmcq08/30/14 02:15 AM
« POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Howard Chu08/28/14 09:17 PM
      POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Aaron Spink08/29/14 07:35 AM
        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S08/29/14 08:34 AM
        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon08/29/14 03:49 PM
          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...foobar08/30/14 09:26 PM
            POWER guys commented on this years ago ...dmcq08/31/14 04:54 AM
              POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Wilco08/31/14 12:52 PM
« POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon08/28/14 08:25 PM
      POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon08/28/14 10:45 PM
      POWER guys commented on this years ago ...rwessel08/29/14 01:14 AM
        POWER guys commented on this years ago ...anon08/29/14 03:49 AM
          POWER guys commented on this years ago ...Michael S08/29/14 06:43 AM
« Decoupling capacitors on GPUsBen08/27/14 11:56 PM
« Haswell CPU article onlineSireesh09/01/14 02:48 PM
      Haswell CPU article onlineMaynard Handley09/01/14 03:51 PM
      Haswell CPU article onlineEduardoS09/01/14 04:21 PM