New article online: MAQSIP RT

Article: MAQSIP-RT: An HPC Benchmark
By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), June 21, 2010 11:57 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Welcome back from the Father's day weekend everyone. I wanted to kick things off with a new article that has been in the works for a while:

http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT050310102525

Carlie Coats, a long time reader has helped us pull together a new benchmark. MAQSIP-RT is an atmospheric chemistry application, so it falls squarely in the realm of HPC. I highly recommend that you take a look at the article, it has an excellent description of the benchmark and some performance numbers from a Supermicro 2S server using Istanbul CPUs.

David
 Next Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
New article online: MAQSIP RTDavid Kanter06/21/10 11:57 AM
  Why no GCC?Rohit06/22/10 09:25 PM
    Why no GCC?David Kanter06/23/10 12:45 AM
      sun 's cc better than GCC?Rohit06/23/10 05:04 AM
        sun 's cc better than GCC?anon06/23/10 07:49 AM
          Where is the GCC optimization effort directed?Mark Roulo06/23/10 10:42 AM
            GCC is very ugly bad everywhere in 64 bitsVincent Diepeveen06/23/10 02:49 PM
              even for 64-bit arch?anon06/23/10 02:59 PM
              GCC is very ugly bad everywhere in 64 bitsajensen06/23/10 11:03 PM
                GCC is very ugly bad everywhere in 64 bitsGabriele Svelto06/24/10 02:33 AM
                  GCC is very ugly bad everywhere in 64 bitsajensen06/24/10 05:32 AM
                    GCC is very ugly bad everywhere in 64 bitsGabriele Svelto06/24/10 07:18 AM
                      GCC is very ugly bad everywhere in 64 bitsajensen06/24/10 09:50 AM
                        Why GCC is big and complicated (my guess)Mark Roulo06/24/10 12:17 PM
                          Why GCC is big and complicated (my guess)Gabriele Svelto06/28/10 04:00 AM
                GCC is very ugly bad everywhere in 64 bitsBernd Schmidt06/24/10 05:46 AM
                  GCC is very ugly bad everywhere in 64 bitsajensen06/24/10 09:43 AM
                  GCC is very ugly bad everywhere in 64 bitsVincent Diepeveen06/26/10 02:12 PM
                GCC is very ugly bad everywhere in 64 bitsRob Thorpe06/24/10 07:47 AM
                  GCC is very ugly bad everywhere in 64 bitsAnon06/24/10 05:23 PM
            Where is the GCC optimization effort directed?Gabriele Svelto06/23/10 10:45 PM
              Where is the GCC optimization effort directed??06/24/10 01:48 AM
                Where is the GCC optimization effort directed?Gabriele Svelto06/24/10 02:29 AM
                  Where is the GCC optimization effort directed??06/24/10 03:13 AM
                    Where is the GCC optimization effort directed?Andi Kleen06/24/10 03:15 AM
                      Where is the GCC optimization effort directed??06/24/10 04:08 AM
                    Where is the GCC optimization effort directed?Gabriele Svelto06/24/10 03:54 AM
                      Where is the GCC optimization effort directed??06/24/10 04:15 AM
                        Where is the GCC optimization effort directed?Gabriele Svelto06/24/10 07:22 AM
                Where is the GCC optimization effort directed?Rohit06/24/10 03:04 AM
                  Placebo effect?06/24/10 06:37 AM
                    Placebo effectRohit06/24/10 08:45 AM
                    Placebo effectVincent Diepeveen06/26/10 02:50 PM
                      Compile timeMark Roulo06/26/10 05:28 PM
                        Compile timeRichard Cownie06/27/10 04:44 AM
                          Compile timeMark Roulo06/27/10 10:12 AM
                          Compile timeMark Roulo06/27/10 10:21 AM
                            Compile timeEduardoS06/27/10 11:37 AM
                            Compile timeRichard Cownie06/27/10 04:07 PM
                              Compile time & efficiency?06/28/10 12:03 AM
                                Compile time & efficiencyMark Christiansen06/28/10 06:08 AM
                                Compile time & efficiencyLinus Torvalds06/28/10 07:48 AM
                                  kernel programming languageJohn Simon06/29/10 06:46 PM
                                Compile time & efficiencyRichard Cownie06/28/10 09:29 AM
                                  Compile time & efficiencyLinus Torvalds06/28/10 11:17 AM
                                    Compile time & efficiencyRichard Cownie06/28/10 02:16 PM
                                      Compile time & efficiencyRichard Cownie06/28/10 06:23 PM
                                        Compile time & efficiencyMark Roulo06/29/10 08:31 AM
                                          Compile time & efficiencyRichard Cownie06/29/10 11:48 AM
                                          Compile time & efficiencyrwessel06/29/10 12:28 PM
                                            C is a crappydev06/29/10 07:12 PM
                                              C is a crappy, but only when you push it out of it's nicheRohit06/30/10 02:11 AM
                                              C is a crappyanon06/30/10 02:17 AM
                                                C is a crappydev06/30/10 07:59 AM
                                                  C is a crappyMax07/01/10 04:30 AM
                                                    C is a crappyMichael S07/01/10 07:00 AM
                                                      C is a crappyKonrad Schwarz07/01/10 08:02 AM
                                                        C is a crappyMichael S07/01/10 08:50 AM
                                                          C isn't so crappyanon07/01/10 10:11 AM
                                                            C isn't so crappyMikael Tillenius07/01/10 11:39 AM
                                                          C is a crappyKonrad Schwarz07/01/10 11:22 AM
                                                          C is a crappyMax07/02/10 08:44 AM
                                                            C is a crappyrwessel07/02/10 12:33 PM
                                                              C is a crappyanon07/02/10 01:17 PM
                                                              C is a crappyMax07/02/10 02:56 PM
                                                                C is a crappyMax07/02/10 03:13 PM
                                                                  C is a crappyrwessel07/02/10 03:32 PM
                                                                    C is a crappyMax07/02/10 04:19 PM
                                                                    C is a crappyGabriele Svelto07/05/10 05:25 AM
                                                      C is a crappygallier207/02/10 12:14 AM
                                                    C is a crappyIan Ollmann07/06/10 03:07 PM
                                                      PortabilityMax07/06/10 03:37 PM
                                                      C is a crappyhobold07/07/10 02:31 AM
                                                        C is a crappyIan Ollmann07/07/10 05:18 PM
                                                      failure to standardize typesCarlie Coats07/07/10 04:11 AM
                                                      C is a crappyKonrad Schwarz07/07/10 08:34 AM
                                                        C is a crappyIan Ollmann07/07/10 05:29 PM
                                                          C is a crappy NOTKonrad Schwarz07/08/10 12:29 AM
                                                  C is a crappyanon07/01/10 10:40 PM
                                                    C type safety?07/02/10 01:10 AM
                                                      C type safetyanon07/02/10 11:02 PM
                                                    C is a crappydev07/03/10 04:51 PM
                                                      C is a crappyanon07/03/10 07:02 PM
                                                        C is a crappydev07/05/10 07:27 AM
                                                          C is a crappy?07/05/10 09:05 AM
                                                            C is a crappyanonymous07/07/10 08:32 AM
                                                              C is a crappy?07/07/10 10:48 PM
                                                              C is a crappyAnon07/08/10 12:53 AM
                                                      C is a crappy and a crappie is a fishanonymous07/03/10 07:24 PM
                                      Compile time & efficiencyMichael S06/29/10 03:18 AM
                                        Compile time & efficiencyrwessel06/29/10 12:20 PM
                                        Compile time & efficiencysomeone06/30/10 11:03 AM
                                        Compile time & efficiencyJouni Osmala07/02/10 05:29 AM
                                  Compile time & efficiencyMax06/28/10 05:05 PM
                                    Compile time & efficiencyEduardoS06/28/10 05:11 PM
                                    Compile time & efficiencyMichael S06/29/10 03:33 AM
                              Compile timeFoo_06/28/10 09:03 AM
          sun 's cc better than GCC?Silent06/23/10 06:19 PM
            sun 's cc better than GCC?Foo_06/23/10 07:06 PM
          sun 's cc better than GCC?Andi Kleen06/24/10 02:49 AM
        sun 's versus gccVincent Diepeveen06/23/10 03:07 PM
    Why no GCC?Carlie Coats06/23/10 05:11 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell blue?