Bulldozer's integer execution units

By: EduardoS (no.delete@this.spam.com), April 27, 2012 1:27 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 4/27/12 wrote:
---------------------------
>Absolutely. In fact, it's more useful in the context of the K8 than Sandy Bridge.
>The K8 cannot re-order so you REALLY want to calculate every address as soon as possible.

It's not just to calculate address as soon as possible, it also help in packing x86 instructions inside the chip and reduce the size of the forwarding network, if there was two decoupled AGUs there would be 5 sources from the forwarding network per ALU, coupled there are only four*.

* Does anyone knows if being a power of 2 helps?
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Phoronix tests GCC compiler flags and Bulldozer.I.S.T.04/19/12 03:05 AM
  Single page view?David Kanter04/19/12 08:59 AM
    Single page view?wainwright04/19/12 09:22 AM
    Single page view?slothrop04/19/12 09:23 AM
      Single page view?David Kanter04/19/12 09:31 AM
        Single page view?EduardoS04/19/12 03:12 PM
    Is there a single page view option for RWT articles?anon04/19/12 09:27 AM
    Single page view?Del04/19/12 09:36 AM
      Single page view?slacker04/19/12 03:56 PM
        Single page view?Del04/22/12 06:09 AM
          Single page view?David Kanter04/22/12 09:38 AM
            Single page view?Del04/23/12 01:22 AM
    Single page view?Michael S04/19/12 01:30 PM
      Single page view?Ungo04/19/12 02:25 PM
        Single page view?Foo_04/20/12 12:17 AM
          Single page view?James04/20/12 04:01 AM
            There are ads on the web?JJB04/20/12 04:32 AM
              What a bunch of freeloaders (NT)slacker04/20/12 01:44 PM
                So are you, probablyiz04/21/12 04:41 AM
                  Impression ad revenuePaul A. Clayton04/21/12 06:44 AM
                  So are you, probablyslacker04/21/12 01:09 PM
                    So are you, probablyDavid Kanter04/22/12 09:41 AM
                      So are you, probablyiz04/22/12 03:57 PM
                    So are you, probablyDoug Siebert04/22/12 12:37 PM
                      Aha!David Kanter04/22/12 03:45 PM
                        Aha!bakaneko04/22/12 08:49 PM
                    So are you, probablyiz04/22/12 03:48 PM
                      That's not how the business works...David Kanter04/22/12 05:31 PM
                        That's not how the business works...iz04/23/12 01:49 AM
                      So are you, probablyslacker04/22/12 11:31 PM
                        back to phoronixMichael S04/23/12 02:07 AM
                        So are you, probablyiz04/23/12 03:29 AM
                          Membership at RWTDavid Kanter04/23/12 11:24 AM
                          So are you, probablyJukka Larja04/27/12 08:59 AM
  So, what do people think of these numbers>I.S.T.04/19/12 07:34 PM
    So, what do people think of these numbers>Linus Torvalds04/20/12 08:34 AM
      So, what do people think of these numbers>Kira04/20/12 09:18 AM
        So, what do people think of these numbers>Linus Torvalds04/20/12 10:05 AM
      So, what do people think of these numbers>Doug Siebert04/20/12 09:00 PM
      So, what do people think of these numbers>Megol04/21/12 09:05 AM
        So, what do people think of these numbers>Linus Torvalds04/21/12 01:11 PM
          Most problems are fixed...Megol04/24/12 07:00 AM
    So, what do people think of these numbers>bakaneko04/20/12 11:16 AM
      So, what do people think of these numbers>bakaneko04/20/12 11:37 AM
        So, what do people think of these numbers>Linus Torvalds04/20/12 01:24 PM
          So, what do people think of these numbers>Joel04/20/12 02:59 PM
            So, what do people think of these numbers>Kira04/20/12 03:32 PM
              So, what do people think of these numbers>EduardoS04/20/12 04:00 PM
                Bulldozer's Oddities.Joel04/20/12 04:54 PM
                  In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesDavid Kanter04/20/12 05:32 PM
                    In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesExophase04/20/12 07:11 PM
                      In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesEduardoS04/20/12 07:46 PM
                        In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesExophase04/20/12 08:18 PM
                          In defense of Bulldozer's Odditiesanonymous04/20/12 11:26 PM
                            In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesJJB04/20/12 11:34 PM
                              In defense of Bulldozer's Odditiesimaxx04/21/12 07:21 AM
                                In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesMichael S04/21/12 10:42 AM
                                  Bulldozer's integer execution unitsDavid Kanter04/25/12 04:29 PM
                                    Bulldozer's integer execution unitsExophase04/26/12 12:17 PM
                                      Bulldozer's integer execution unitsanonymous04/26/12 03:15 PM
                                        Bulldozer's integer execution unitsEduardoS04/26/12 03:40 PM
                                          Bulldozer's integer execution unitsFoo_04/27/12 08:21 AM
                                            Bulldozer's integer execution unitsMegol04/27/12 01:38 PM
                                      Bulldozer's integer execution unitsEduardoS04/26/12 03:47 PM
                                        Bulldozer's integer execution unitsExophase04/26/12 05:02 PM
                                          Bulldozer's integer execution unitsEduardoS04/26/12 06:03 PM
                                            Bulldozer's integer execution unitsExophase04/26/12 06:24 PM
                                              Bulldozer's integer execution unitsEduardoS04/26/12 07:18 PM
                                                Bulldozer's cache memory performanceHeikki Kultala04/28/12 01:18 AM
                                                  Bulldozer's cache memory performanceEduardoS04/28/12 10:06 AM
                                      Bulldozer's integer execution unitsDavid Kanter04/26/12 04:03 PM
                                        Bulldozer's integer execution unitsExophase04/26/12 04:59 PM
                                          Bulldozer's integer execution unitsDavid Kanter04/26/12 10:53 PM
                                            Bulldozer's integer execution unitsExophase04/27/12 08:42 AM
                                              Bulldozer's integer execution unitsDavid Kanter04/27/12 11:06 AM
                                                Bulldozer's integer execution unitsEduardoS04/27/12 01:27 PM
                                                K8 divided pipelines?Paul A. Clayton04/27/12 01:59 PM
                                          Bulldozer's integer execution unitsMichael S04/27/12 04:37 AM
                                            Bulldozer's integer execution unitsExophase04/27/12 08:33 AM
                                            Bulldozer's integer execution unitsanonymous04/27/12 09:03 AM
                                    Renaming FlagsKonrad Schwarz04/27/12 03:04 AM
                                      Renaming Flagsnone04/27/12 04:03 AM
                                        Renaming FlagsMegol04/27/12 12:42 PM
                                    Bulldozer's integer execution unitshcl6404/27/12 04:31 PM
                                      VEX supports 3+ operands. FPU have renaming already(NT)Megol04/28/12 08:20 AM
                              In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesLinus Torvalds04/21/12 12:26 PM
                                Thanks for the lessonJJB04/21/12 02:23 PM
                                  Side note..Linus Torvalds04/21/12 02:57 PM
                            In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesExophase04/21/12 12:13 PM
                            In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesEduardoS04/21/12 12:53 PM
                    In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesGionatan Danti04/21/12 12:42 PM
                    In defense of Bulldozer's Odditieshcl6404/27/12 05:07 PM
                      In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesDavid Kanter04/28/12 06:29 AM
                        In defense of Bulldozer's Odditieshcl6404/28/12 02:44 PM
                          In defense of Bulldozer's OdditiesDavid Kanter04/28/12 09:42 PM
                            In defense of Bulldozer's Odditieshcl6404/28/12 10:39 PM
                  Bulldozer's Oddities.EduardoS04/20/12 06:05 PM
                    Bulldozer's Oddities.anon04/20/12 08:32 PM
                      Bulldozer's Oddities.EduardoS04/21/12 12:37 PM
                        Bulldozer's Oddities.anon04/21/12 10:16 PM
                          Bulldozer's Oddities.EduardoS04/21/12 10:43 PM
                            Bulldozer's Oddities.anon04/22/12 02:09 AM
                              Bulldozer's Oddities.EduardoS04/22/12 01:57 PM
                                Bulldozer's Oddities.anon04/22/12 04:17 PM
                                  Bulldozer's Oddities.EduardoS04/22/12 05:05 PM
                                    Bulldozer's Oddities.anon04/22/12 05:42 PM
                                      Bulldozer's Oddities.anon04/22/12 06:01 PM
                                      Bulldozer's Oddities.EduardoS04/22/12 10:28 PM
                                        Bulldozer's Oddities.anon04/22/12 11:05 PM
                  Bulldozer's isn't bad.a reader04/21/12 10:01 AM
                    Bulldozer's isn't bad.Kira04/21/12 11:29 AM
                      Bulldozer's isn't bad.hcl6404/27/12 05:58 PM
                        Bulldozer's isn't bad.anon04/27/12 06:16 PM
                          Bulldozer's isn't bad.hcl6404/27/12 07:33 PM
                            Bulldozer's isn't bad.rwessel04/27/12 11:12 PM
                        Bulldozer's isn't bad.EduardoS04/28/12 09:29 AM
                          Bulldozer's isn't bad.EduardoS04/28/12 09:30 AM
                          Bulldozer's isn't bad.Michael S04/28/12 12:36 PM
                    Bulldozer is made for SPEC fpPelle-4804/21/12 11:41 AM
                  Bulldozer's Oddities.mpx04/22/12 03:47 AM
                    Bulldozer's Oddities.EduardoS04/22/12 01:57 PM
                      Bulldozer's Oddities.mpx04/23/12 07:04 AM
                        Bulldozer's Oddities.Eric04/23/12 12:33 PM
                          Bulldozer's Oddities.EduardoS04/23/12 02:22 PM
                            Bulldozer's Oddities.Eric04/23/12 07:30 PM
                              Bulldozer's Oddities.hcl6404/27/12 06:16 PM
                            Bulldozer's Oddities.Y04/25/12 04:34 AM
                              Bulldozer's IDIVHeikki Kultala04/27/12 10:56 PM
                                Bulldozer's IDIVY04/30/12 01:51 AM
                                  Bulldozer's IDIVEduardoS04/30/12 05:39 AM
                                    Bulldozer's IDIVP3Dnow05/08/12 01:23 AM
                                      Bulldozer's IDIVExophase05/08/12 07:37 AM
                        Bulldozer's Oddities.EduardoS04/23/12 02:15 PM
              Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyPaul A. Clayton04/20/12 04:10 PM
                Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyhcl6404/28/12 12:56 AM
                  Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyanonymous04/28/12 01:43 AM
                    Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyhcl6404/28/12 02:59 PM
                      Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyanonymous04/28/12 08:45 PM
                  Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyanon04/28/12 02:13 AM
                    Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyhcl6404/28/12 03:23 PM
                      Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyanon04/28/12 06:19 PM
                        Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyhcl6404/28/12 07:58 PM
                  Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyDavid Kanter04/28/12 06:38 AM
                    Guessed meaning of "strong dependency model"Paul A. Clayton04/28/12 07:24 AM
                      Guessed meaning of "strong dependency model"EduardoS04/28/12 09:46 AM
                        *Right meaning* about "strong dependency model"hcl6404/28/12 04:59 PM
                    Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyhcl6404/28/12 04:24 PM
                      Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyanonymous04/28/12 08:50 PM
                        Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyhcl6404/28/12 09:47 PM
                          SNB widthDavid Kanter04/28/12 09:48 PM
                            SNB widthhcl6404/29/12 02:24 AM
                      Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyDavid Kanter04/28/12 09:56 PM
                        Clustered MT as SMT for high frequencyhcl6404/28/12 11:44 PM
                          SOI, FD vs. PDDavid Kanter04/29/12 07:19 AM
                            SOI, FD vs. PDhcl6404/29/12 05:31 PM
                              SOI, FD vs. PDDavid Kanter04/29/12 11:26 PM
                                SOI, FD vs. PDhcl6404/30/12 08:08 AM
                                  SOI, FD vs. PDDavid Kanter04/30/12 09:59 AM
                                    SOI, FD vs. PDhcl6404/30/12 06:10 PM
                                      SOI, FD vs. PDDavid Kanter04/30/12 06:32 PM
                                        SOI, FD vs. PDhcl6404/30/12 10:47 PM
                                          SOI, FD vs. PDDavid Kanter05/01/12 02:24 AM
                                            SOI, FD vs. PDhcl6405/01/12 05:46 AM
                                            SOI, FD vs. PDhcl6405/01/12 06:37 AM
                                              SOI, FD vs. PDDavid Kanter05/01/12 08:19 AM
                                          SOI, FD vs. PDhcl6405/01/12 07:39 AM
                                            PD-SOIDavid Kanter05/02/12 12:22 PM
                                    SOI, FD vs. PDslacker04/30/12 08:10 PM
                                      SOI, FD vs. PDDavid Kanter04/30/12 10:16 PM
                                        SOI, FD vs. PDslacker05/01/12 10:04 PM
                                          SOI, FD vs. PDDavid Kanter05/02/12 08:19 AM
                                            SOI, FD vs. PDzou05/02/12 12:23 PM
                  Previous discussion of clustered MTPaul A. Clayton04/28/12 07:00 AM
                    Previous discussion of clustered MThcl6404/28/12 09:38 PM
                      Previous discussion of clustered MTDavid Kanter04/30/12 04:37 PM
                        Previous discussion of clustered MThcl6404/30/12 07:24 PM
                          Previous discussion of clustered MTDavid Kanter04/30/12 07:40 PM
                            Previous discussion of clustered MThcl6405/01/12 09:15 AM
                              Latency issuesDavid Kanter05/02/12 12:01 PM
              So, what do people think of these numbers>Megol04/21/12 01:57 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell blue?