By: hcl64 (mario.smarq.delete@this.gmail.com), May 1, 2012 5:46 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 5/1/12 wrote:
---------------------------
>I don't care about existing NovaThor products, I care about FD-SOI. Stop changing the subject.
>
>[snip]
>
>>**Nevertheless it seems clear i was wrong**, FD-SOI will >not be first to market
>>than Intel FinFET.
>
>I'm glad you now have a more realistic understanding of FinFETs and FD-SOI.
>
Sorry Mr. Kanter i still have the same; i wrote:
"" **Nevertheless it seems clear i was wrong**, FD-SOI will not be first to market than Intel FinFET. But it will happen now, even if STE ends up sold, there is a guaranty that there will be an ARM(+-MALI) at 28nm FD-SOI, NOT fiction (below).""
The only thing that changed was time-to-market. And in this respect is very difficult to beat Intel which can put has much money at a problem as everybody else put together.
---------------------------
>I don't care about existing NovaThor products, I care about FD-SOI. Stop changing the subject.
>
>[snip]
>
>>**Nevertheless it seems clear i was wrong**, FD-SOI will >not be first to market
>>than Intel FinFET.
>
>I'm glad you now have a more realistic understanding of FinFETs and FD-SOI.
>
Sorry Mr. Kanter i still have the same; i wrote:
"" **Nevertheless it seems clear i was wrong**, FD-SOI will not be first to market than Intel FinFET. But it will happen now, even if STE ends up sold, there is a guaranty that there will be an ARM(+-MALI) at 28nm FD-SOI, NOT fiction (below).""
The only thing that changed was time-to-market. And in this respect is very difficult to beat Intel which can put has much money at a problem as everybody else put together.



