By: none (none.delete@this.none.com), May 4, 2012 12:48 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 5/4/12 wrote:
---------------------------
>Del (_@_.com) on 5/4/12 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Wilco (Wilco.Dijkstra@ntlworld.com) on 5/3/12 wrote:
>>---------------------------
>>>Yes, AnandTech has the usual crappy phone benchmarks which show major performance gains: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-performance-preview
>>
>>Thanks for the link, it does provide some insight.
>
>I've always been curious how well Linpack runs on phones : )
The Linpack you see tested on phones is written in Java. The
performance has nothing to do with what the CPUs can do.
>>It seems obvious why Intel wanted to show off the Sunspider >bench, they were cherry
>>picking hard. Medfield is not competitive even on single >thread load it seems.
>
>Which single threaded loads are you thinking?
SunSpider is single-threaded.
---------------------------
>Del (_@_.com) on 5/4/12 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Wilco (Wilco.Dijkstra@ntlworld.com) on 5/3/12 wrote:
>>---------------------------
>>>Yes, AnandTech has the usual crappy phone benchmarks which show major performance gains: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-performance-preview
>>
>>Thanks for the link, it does provide some insight.
>
>I've always been curious how well Linpack runs on phones : )
The Linpack you see tested on phones is written in Java. The
performance has nothing to do with what the CPUs can do.
>>It seems obvious why Intel wanted to show off the Sunspider >bench, they were cherry
>>picking hard. Medfield is not competitive even on single >thread load it seems.
>
>Which single threaded loads are you thinking?
SunSpider is single-threaded.



