By: EduardoS (no.delete@this.spam.com), July 25, 2012 8:14 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
EduardoS (no.delete@this.spam.com) on July 25, 2012 8:12 pm wrote:
> 1) It is wrong, take Interlagos for example, a 140W dual chip
> processor, it have 8 modules, each able to perform 2 FMACs per clock, so 32
> flops per clock, right? At 2.6GHz it is a little less than 0.6 DP Flops/Watt,
> well, turbo may help a little but no way to the ~1.4 DP Flops/Watt in the chart,
> the DP Flops/mm² looks proportionally wrong as well.
Multiply by 2, it's SIMD... But at this rate turbo will hardly kick in.
> 1) It is wrong, take Interlagos for example, a 140W dual chip
> processor, it have 8 modules, each able to perform 2 FMACs per clock, so 32
> flops per clock, right? At 2.6GHz it is a little less than 0.6 DP Flops/Watt,
> well, turbo may help a little but no way to the ~1.4 DP Flops/Watt in the chart,
> the DP Flops/mm² looks proportionally wrong as well.
Multiply by 2, it's SIMD... But at this rate turbo will hardly kick in.
