By: Robert Myers (rbmyersusa.delete@this.gmail.com), October 16, 2012 7:28 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
forestlaughing (forestlaughing.delete@this.yahoo.com) on October 15, 2012 8:57 am wrote:
> Even custom vector machines have converged into slight variations
> of what the server processors offer. The advantages of pulling functionality
> into a single chip are huge. The one thing that can't yet be pulled into the CPU
> chip, is main memory, at least not in sizes large enough to be super useful.
> Perhaps chip stacking + TSVs will make this possible.
If your answer to every query about why you are not building better computers is that you can't, then my response to every claim made by everyone in the business is that you should stop building *bigger* computers until you know how to build *better* computers.
I will concede that one figure of merit that should get attention has gotten attention, and that is flops per watt. Aside from that, the business has essentially turned into a marketing claims factory.
Robert.
> Even custom vector machines have converged into slight variations
> of what the server processors offer. The advantages of pulling functionality
> into a single chip are huge. The one thing that can't yet be pulled into the CPU
> chip, is main memory, at least not in sizes large enough to be super useful.
> Perhaps chip stacking + TSVs will make this possible.
If your answer to every query about why you are not building better computers is that you can't, then my response to every claim made by everyone in the business is that you should stop building *bigger* computers until you know how to build *better* computers.
I will concede that one figure of merit that should get attention has gotten attention, and that is flops per watt. Aside from that, the business has essentially turned into a marketing claims factory.
Robert.



