By: anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com), October 17, 2012 8:36 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Robert Myers (rbmyersusa.delete@this.gmail.com) on October 17, 2012 7:14 pm wrote:
> anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com) on October 17, 2012 5:58 pm wrote:
>
> > If
> you had
> > any substance, you shouldn't need to fill out whole paragraphs
> with personal
> > attacks. But a smattering of them, when warranted, is
> accepted.
> >
>
> You are posting anonymously, and you accuse me of personal
> attacks?
Nice selective quoting. I replied specifically do this:
"I don't think David Kanter would appreciate my knack for vicious prose."
It was not an accusation of any personal attack, I was just commenting that you're free to use them here, so you do not have to hold back vicious prose, so long as it comes with content.
But hey, while we're on the topic, you *did* personally attack me already (just look up the thread a couple of posts). I just didn't care enough to point it out. Put another way: I'm encouraging your personal attacks, if that's what it takes to get content.
> You are pathetic. At this point, you dare not identify yourself. If
> you hold a position of any notability, you should be fired.
You have thin skin for someone who is happy to talk about everyone else being wrong. I would have thought you'd be quite accustomed to being called to answer for your claims.
> anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com) on October 17, 2012 5:58 pm wrote:
>
> > If
> you had
> > any substance, you shouldn't need to fill out whole paragraphs
> with personal
> > attacks. But a smattering of them, when warranted, is
> accepted.
> >
>
> You are posting anonymously, and you accuse me of personal
> attacks?
Nice selective quoting. I replied specifically do this:
"I don't think David Kanter would appreciate my knack for vicious prose."
It was not an accusation of any personal attack, I was just commenting that you're free to use them here, so you do not have to hold back vicious prose, so long as it comes with content.
But hey, while we're on the topic, you *did* personally attack me already (just look up the thread a couple of posts). I just didn't care enough to point it out. Put another way: I'm encouraging your personal attacks, if that's what it takes to get content.
> You are pathetic. At this point, you dare not identify yourself. If
> you hold a position of any notability, you should be fired.
You have thin skin for someone who is happy to talk about everyone else being wrong. I would have thought you'd be quite accustomed to being called to answer for your claims.
