By: Mr. Camel (a.delete@this.b.c), December 12, 2012 1:39 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
EduardoS (no.delete@this.spam.com) on November 28, 2012 7:27 pm wrote:
> Mr. Camel (a.delete@this.b.c) on November 28, 2012 7:23 pm wrote:
> > It is still 4 way superscalar so it is technically not wider. Only the dispatch width is larger.
> >
> > Even if the base frequency is not higher, I would suspect that the turbo frequency should be a lot
> > higher especially in cases where the GPU is not used (in which case it will be powered off), right?
>
> Well... The OoO window growth, the issue width, the register file,
> the scheduller... I am not sure there is thermal headroom left...
You were right. The top bin Haswell is rumored to have the exact same clock frequency as the top bin Ivy Bridge. And the TDP has gone up to 84W from 77W.
http://chinese.vr-zone.com/43824/intel-haswell-cpu-will-release-at-2013-q2-with-13-model-including-4770k-4670k-for-overclocking-12112012/
> Mr. Camel (a.delete@this.b.c) on November 28, 2012 7:23 pm wrote:
> > It is still 4 way superscalar so it is technically not wider. Only the dispatch width is larger.
> >
> > Even if the base frequency is not higher, I would suspect that the turbo frequency should be a lot
> > higher especially in cases where the GPU is not used (in which case it will be powered off), right?
>
> Well... The OoO window growth, the issue width, the register file,
> the scheduller... I am not sure there is thermal headroom left...
You were right. The top bin Haswell is rumored to have the exact same clock frequency as the top bin Ivy Bridge. And the TDP has gone up to 84W from 77W.
http://chinese.vr-zone.com/43824/intel-haswell-cpu-will-release-at-2013-q2-with-13-model-including-4770k-4670k-for-overclocking-12112012/
