Mill made more sense in 2003

By: anon (spam.delete.delete@this.this.spam.com), April 20, 2017 12:15 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
RichardC (tich.delete@this.pobox.com) on April 20, 2017 9:39 am wrote:
> anon (spam.delete.delete@this.this.spam.com) on April 20, 2017 6:35 am wrote:
> > Megol is definitely partially right.
>
> > The power consumption for OoOE hardware is not negligible. Otherwise
> > no one would be building any in-order cores anymore.
>
> Lots of people build in-order cores for applications which need throughput-per-watt
> or just-enough-performance at low cost. But nobody builds in-order cores for general-purpose
> computers whose workloads may include some single-thread-performance-critical stuff.
>
> You *need* OoO to get competitive single-thread performance in a general-purpose
> computer. Obviously it isn't free; but the reason designers put it in is because
> it's the cheapest way to get that level of single-thread performance.
>
> [Note that there have been various efforts - especially in SPARC servers - to try
> to use massive number of threads and massive numbers of cores, but with weak single-thread
> performance. Those cpu's have failed in the market: a flock of ducks can't beat a horse,
> or at least not in a horse race.]
>

I'm not sure what your argument is here.
First you argue that OoO is not a large percentage of power consumption which is wrong.
Now you agree that it costs power, but because it's the best way to get performance right now it is somehow impossible that any other approach could work?

> > Regardless of process improvements and clock/power gating bringing down absolute power consumption,
> > which can also be applied to any other architecture by the way, OoOE hardware still uses
> > quite a bit of power. Megol's point was that scaling didn't suddenly improve, if you want
> > to wider that power goes up fast. Sure, we can deal with more of that thanks to aforementioned
> > improvements, but eliminating it altogether would be a huge improvement.
>
> Yes, *if* you have a way to "eliminate it altogether" while still maintaining high
> single-thread performance on a wide variety of general-purpose code. As I've gone
> into in considerable detail, a fully static-scheduled approach like the Mill would
> appear to be utterly disastrous on a wide variety of code - like, anything with
> virtual method calls, or not-totally-predictable-at-compile-time control flow or memory
> access patterns. It's a 1990-era idea about how to run 1980-era software. But a lot has
> changed in software since 1980; and a lot has changed in hardware since 1990.
>

"would appear to be" is the important part. It's not like they haven't tried to adress the shortcomings of static scheduling. I don't think anyone can accurately predict how well it'll work until we've seen an FPGA implementation run actual code.
I trust them enough to be able to adress most of the problems. Especially with control over the compiler you can obviously prevent a lot of the more nasty things from existing entirely.
However I'm also sure that there will be things where the mill will be slower. So the questions are how large is the portion that it doesn't run well on, how well do the good portions (e.g. loops) work and how does it average out in the end.
I'm more concerned about speculation, rather than lack of OoO.

> > So it remains to be seen whether or not it'll get them
> > better perf/Watt at or above current OoOE performance.
>
> I'd love to be able to make a bet that it won't, because *everything* about it violates
> everything I know from 3 decades of software performance analysis and optimization.
>

I would too, but there's a few problems with that.
1. I don't think you'd pay up. That is the norm with bets on the internet.
2. While I'm rather skeptical that it'll be the slam dunk they claim, unless something something goes horribly wrong they should end up with something at least comparable. That's far from the disaster you're predicting, but obviously not the straight up win required for the bet.
3. I have my doubts about the commercial viability. This ties into 2. Even if they get better perf/Watt it needs to be something like a 2x-4x advantage to make the rather difficult software transition worthwhile. Without that we won't see silicon. Without silicon we won't get a fair perf/Watt comparision with current OoO CPUs.

> > I decided to search for some more information on their "best guess" and I found this:
> > http://millcomputing.com/topic/introduction-to-the-mill-cpu-programming-model-2/#post-610
> > http://millcomputing.com/wiki/Cores
> >
> > 512B scratchpad would be a 64 reg x 64 bit register file, not really
> > unreasonable, especially with their planned 3 cycle latency.
> > But the bypass network. I mean SKL needs 3x256b for ALUs, 2x256b for ld/st,
> > 2x256b for just store and then 1x something for INT ALU/branch.
> > Mill Gold needs 4x128b for the big ALUs, 4x128b for the small ALUs (no MUL/FP), 8x128b
> > ld/st, 8x128b ld, 5x128b st. It's not going to be cheap, even at lower clockrates.
>
> As it happens, way back in the 1980s I spent a while working with transputers, which
> had a small (4KB or 8KB) of small on-chip RAM. That approach can work for embedded
> applications, where you know before you boot the machine precisely what performance-
> critical code is going to run. And it's an absolute nightmare for general-purpose
> computing, where you have no way to know what programs are going to run.
>
> The Mill's view of software seems to be so utterly stone-age that it's
> designed for Fortran-IV or so, and it's going to be massively uncomfortable with any
> code which involves recursion or deep call stacks - like, for example, every damn
> program written in an object-oriented language since about 1990.
>

Not sure where you're going with this. Did you cut the quote in the wrong place?
I was talking about the implementation cost, you go on about software.
Same with the on-chip RAM. I don't think they're trying to run a program out of the scratchpad.
I mean do you think they'd specify a cache line size and then not have any caches?

> > Well ROBs and renaming aren't terribly efficient and are not directly related to moving the data,
> > just indirectly. Getting the performance without the associated cost is the holy grail.
> >
> > > The gearbox in my minivan is "inefficient", in that it "wastes" some power. But if you take it
> > > out and connect the engine direct to the wheels, you don't get a faster car. It's necessary,
> > > and there isn't a better alternative (yet).
> >
> > To stick with your analogy: You only need the gear box because your engine's rpm vs torque characteristics
> > are terrible. An electric motor doesn't have that problem and doesn't need a gearbox.
>
> Yes. And if the Mill architects had a brand-new main-memory technology, they could throw
> away the unpredictability of multiple levels of caches and the complexity of OoO which
> dynamically adjusts around that unpredictability. But they don't. They've got totally
> conventional memory and cache technology, and totally conventional ALU's (all of it only
> on paper). So their claim is that they can rip out the gearbox without changing the engine. Meh.
>

The whole point was to find another way of dealing with the caches.
OoO is the engine here.

> > > 33% of the power. [But I bet it wasn't as high as 80% to start with].
> > >
> >
> > I don't think vector friendly code is really the main focal point here.
>
> Well, it's sure going to run like a crippled dog on branchy integer code, and even
> worse if their are hashtables or trees or lists involved, so,
> as a Belgian friend used to say "It is hard to see what *is* the point ?"
>

GPUs run vectors just fine. Or just bolt wider SIMD onto an existing architecture.

They obviously have to eliminate quite a few branches with predication. Can't have multiple jumps within what they want to be a single instruction.

I'm really not concerned about OoO. As Andy Glew said, there isn't that much of it anyway.
They definitely need something like runahead mode though, if they can't future loads into the caches during a stall then they are going to stall an awful lot.

But the biggest problem is still the lack of speculative execution. I don't know how many tricks they have up their sleeves, but no matter what, when your loads depend on the parameters of a function then you're not going to hoist those loads any further up than to the time when the parameters become known. From what I've seen so far they'd have to stall and wait for cache misses until execution of that function is complete.
I mean just as an example something like
for ( whatever )
if ( x[i] > 0 ) foo(x);

The reordering is a nice benefit on OoO, but the main benefit is that as long as the branch predictor guesses correctly the CPU doesn't need to worry about the exact value of x[i] and whatever memory accesses it caused within foo() for quite a while, until it runs out of ROB space. Nobody cares whether everything after that is done in order (with the exception of the stalled function) or wildly out of order, just the fact that work can be done while waiting for the cache misses is important. The mill would stall.

Predication can't save them, unless they executed everything then predicated the results (with NaRs/Nones taking care of exceptions). Even assuming they get everything at least into the L3 and can hide that latency, they still take a hit for executing the preamble and execute a ton of unnecessary work. It also completely kills the code density because they need to unroll the loop enough to hide the worst cache miss they expect. And if a miss goes to RAM they still stall.

This isn't even a nasty example.

No one cares about reordering instructions by one or two cycles, it's about being able to move larger, independent blocks beyond branches that possibly won't resolve for a while. Whether you want to call it speculative execution or reordering or OoO doesn't matter. With the ISA/software support they require it could be done with a fraction of the effort. So far I haven't seen any trace of anything similar in what they've published.

If you have to do it in hardware it's expensive and you might as well do the small scale, moving things by a few cycle, optimizations, since all the dependency analysis has to be done anyway.


Getting rid of all the analysis and renaming in hardware? Great.
But this is the one thing that OoO has that they need to keep.
Out of all the candidates that could kill performance on the mill I think this one is by far the most likely.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Apple confirms that they are ditching Imagination within two yearsAnon04/03/17 01:21 AM
  Apple confirms that they are ditching Imagination within two yearsMichael S04/03/17 01:40 AM
    MIPSAnon04/03/17 01:48 AM
      Microprocessor WITH interlocked Pipeline Stages, please rest in peace!Heikki Kultala04/03/17 03:59 AM
        Microprocessor WITH interlocked Pipeline Stages, please rest in peace!RichardC04/03/17 07:17 AM
          RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC04/03/17 05:49 PM
            RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/03/17 06:12 PM
              RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko04/03/17 11:40 PM
            RISC *was* science, not religionLinus Torvalds04/03/17 06:25 PM
              RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC04/03/17 06:45 PM
                RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/03/17 08:37 PM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko04/04/17 12:00 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/04/17 01:23 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/04/17 01:51 AM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko04/04/17 04:17 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/04/17 06:39 AM
                RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC04/04/17 06:02 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/04/17 07:05 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC04/04/17 08:06 AM
                      Try not to aim for one point on the curve!David Kanter04/05/17 10:15 PM
                        Try not to aim for one point on the curve!RichardC04/06/17 04:11 AM
                          Try not to aim for one point on the curve!Michael S04/06/17 06:17 AM
                            Try not to aim for one point on the curve!Ireland04/06/17 10:16 AM
                            Try not to aim for one point on the curve!RichardC04/06/17 10:25 AM
                              Influence of Palm and Blackberry on Smaller DevicesIreland04/06/17 10:45 AM
                          Try not to aim for one point on the curve!Ireland04/06/17 10:11 AM
                          RISC not needed for smartphones and tabletsHeikki Kultala04/06/17 10:39 PM
                        Try not to aim for one point on the curve!coppice04/07/17 03:52 AM
                          Try not to aim for one point on the curve!Michael_S04/07/17 04:41 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko04/04/17 07:55 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/04/17 08:59 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/05/17 03:53 AM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionBrett04/05/17 09:25 PM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/06/17 02:36 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionBrett04/06/17 09:36 PM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/07/17 07:05 AM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionBrett04/08/17 12:02 AM
                                RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq04/08/17 04:45 AM
                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/08/17 08:39 AM
                                  (disappointing) Mill progressUngo04/08/17 01:07 PM
                                    (disappointing) Mill progressMichael S04/08/17 01:36 PM
                                      (disappointing) Mill progresswumpus04/08/17 06:44 PM
                                      I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSP (NT)Heikki Kultala04/08/17 10:16 PM
                                        I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPCoppice04/08/17 10:40 PM
                                          I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPCoppice04/08/17 11:32 PM
                                            I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPwumpus04/09/17 09:41 AM
                                          I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPHeikki Kultala04/09/17 09:49 PM
                                        I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPMichael S04/09/17 03:15 AM
                                          I don't understand why they are aiming for CPU instead for DSPanon04/09/17 07:01 AM
                                  RISC *was* science, not religionBrett04/09/17 12:16 AM
                                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/09/17 09:30 AM
                                      RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/09/17 10:04 AM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/09/17 11:06 AM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionBrett04/09/17 10:53 PM
                                          RISC *was* science, not religionDoug S04/10/17 02:03 PM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionMichael_S04/11/17 10:14 AM
                                      RISC *was* science, not religionBrett04/10/17 12:01 AM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/10/17 02:11 AM
                                          RISC *was* science, not religionDoug S04/11/17 03:31 PM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionBrett04/11/17 10:06 PM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/12/17 04:49 AM
                                RISC *was* science, not religionGabriele Svelto04/09/17 01:55 AM
                                  RISC *was* science, not religionMegol04/10/17 10:42 AM
                                    RISC *was* science, not religionGabriele Svelto04/10/17 02:12 PM
                                      RISC *was* science, not religionMegol04/11/17 12:23 PM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionGabriele Svelto04/11/17 01:49 PM
                                          The Mill is not dataflowPaul A. Clayton04/12/17 04:43 AM
                                            The Mill is not dataflowAdrian04/12/17 11:21 AM
                                              Name rather than address for Mill pick-up loads?Paul A. Clayton04/12/17 07:35 PM
                                                Name rather than address for Mill pick-up loads?Adrian04/12/17 11:51 PM
                                                  Fractional bits for instruction encodingook04/13/17 01:56 AM
                                                    Fractional bits have been used for RegID encoding (NT)Paul A. Clayton04/13/17 04:04 AM
                                                    Fractional bits for instruction encodingMegol04/13/17 05:21 AM
                                                      fractional bitsRichardC04/13/17 06:20 AM
                                                        fractional bitsMegol04/15/17 06:22 AM
                                                          fractional bitsRichardC04/15/17 10:58 AM
                                                            fractional bitsAdrian04/16/17 04:08 AM
                                                              fractional bitsdmcq04/16/17 05:04 AM
                                                              fractional bitsMichael_S04/16/17 05:27 AM
                                                                The Mill spills load buffers on function callsPaul A. Clayton04/16/17 12:44 PM
                                                                  The Mill spills load buffers on function callsRichardC04/16/17 02:36 PM
                                                                    A specialized cache for spillsPaul A. Clayton04/16/17 04:52 PM
                                                                      A specialized cache for spillsRichardC04/17/17 01:16 AM
                                                                        The cycle-predictable domainRichardC04/17/17 08:29 AM
                                                                          The cycle-predictable domainMichael S04/17/17 02:35 PM
                                                                            The cycle-predictable domainRichardC04/17/17 03:01 PM
                                                                              The cycle-predictable domainMichael S04/17/17 03:37 PM
                                                                                The cycle-predictable domainRichardC04/17/17 05:25 PM
                                                                                  The cycle-predictable domainRichardC04/20/17 09:10 AM
                                                                                    The cycle-predictable domainMichael S04/21/17 05:15 AM
                                                                                      sgemm detailsRichardC04/21/17 06:09 AM
                                                                                        sgemm detailsRichardC04/21/17 09:45 AM
                                                                                          sgemm detailsRichardC04/21/17 11:27 AM
                                                                                            sgemm detailsMichael S04/22/17 10:43 AM
                                                                                        Mill "registers"Michael S04/22/17 11:45 AM
                                                                          The cycle-predictable domainJacob Marley04/17/17 09:28 PM
                                                                            The cycle-predictable domainJacob Marley04/17/17 09:28 PM
                                                                            The cycle-predictable domainMaynard Handley04/17/17 10:00 PM
                                                                            OoO window and cachesRichardC04/18/17 06:53 AM
                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC04/18/17 02:48 PM
                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003Megol04/18/17 03:24 PM
                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC04/18/17 04:46 PM
                                                                                Mill made more sense in 2003Megol04/19/17 10:02 AM
                                                                                  Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC04/19/17 01:22 PM
                                                                                    Mill made more sense in 2003anon04/20/17 06:35 AM
                                                                                      Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC04/20/17 09:39 AM
                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003anon04/20/17 12:15 PM
                                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC04/20/17 01:10 PM
                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003anon04/20/17 03:27 PM
                                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC04/20/17 07:33 PM
                                                                                                Mill made more sense in 2003anon04/21/17 03:35 AM
                                                                                                  Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC04/21/17 05:25 AM
                                                                                                    DenverRichardC04/21/17 05:54 AM
                                                                                                      Denverdmcq04/22/17 04:57 AM
                                                                                                        DenverMichael S04/22/17 11:58 AM
                                                                                                          Denverdmcq04/22/17 12:57 PM
                                                                                                            DenverRichardC04/22/17 02:41 PM
                                                                                                              Denverdmcq04/22/17 03:35 PM
                                                                                                                Denverdmcq04/22/17 03:41 PM
                                                                                                            DenverMichael S04/22/17 03:41 PM
                                                                                                    Mill made more sense in 2003anon04/21/17 07:55 AM
                                                                                                      Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC04/21/17 08:56 AM
                                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003anon04/21/17 11:46 AM
                                                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC04/21/17 02:13 PM
                                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003anon04/21/17 02:21 PM
                                                                                                      Mill made more sense in 2003none04/21/17 09:03 AM
                                                                                                      Mill made more sense in 2003NoSpammer04/21/17 12:40 PM
                                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003anon04/21/17 01:19 PM
                                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003Megol04/22/17 04:42 AM
                                                                                                          Mill made more sense in 2003RichardC04/22/17 11:07 AM
                                                                                              Actually, Mill scratchpad is more like 1 cycleHenry S04/21/17 02:27 PM
                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003Jacob Marley04/20/17 10:14 PM
                                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003Jacob Marley04/20/17 10:14 PM
                                                                                                Mill made more sense in 2003Jacob Marley04/20/17 10:15 PM
                                                                                              OoOE processor and virtual function callsHeikki kultala04/20/17 10:59 PM
                                                                                                OoOE processor and virtual function callsJacob Marley04/21/17 01:12 AM
                                                                                                  OoOE processor and virtual function callsMichael_S04/21/17 03:04 AM
                                                                                                OoOE processor and virtual function callsRichardC04/21/17 06:26 AM
                                                                                            Mill made more sense in 2003Michael_S04/21/17 03:37 AM
                                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003Gabriele Svelto04/22/17 03:17 PM
                                                                                        Mill is optimized for frequent callsHenry S04/21/17 02:27 AM
                                                                                          spillerRichardC04/21/17 07:53 AM
                                                                                            spiller documentationRichardC04/21/17 08:04 AM
                                                                                            spillerSymmetry04/21/17 08:47 AM
                                                                                              spillerSymmetry04/21/17 08:51 AM
                                                                                        Mill made more sense in 2003wumpus04/21/17 07:59 AM
                                                                                  Mill made more sense in 2003wumpus04/20/17 07:58 AM
                                                                              Mill made more sense in 2003anon04/18/17 08:02 PM
                                                                          virtual method callsRichardC04/19/17 08:50 AM
                                                                fractional bitsrwessel04/17/17 02:14 AM
                                                                  fractional bitsMichael S04/17/17 12:50 PM
                                                                    fractional bitsEugene Nalimov04/17/17 08:25 PM
                                                              fractional bitsMegol04/16/17 03:05 PM
                                                                fractional bitsdmcq04/17/17 03:04 AM
                                                                  fractional bitsGabriele Svelto04/17/17 10:09 AM
                                                                    fractional bitsMaynard Handley04/17/17 11:53 AM
                                                                      fractional bitsanon04/17/17 02:29 PM
                                                                Excellent exampleHenry S04/21/17 02:02 PM
                                                              fractional bitsanon04/16/17 05:31 PM
                                                                OoO instruction windowPaul A. Clayton04/17/17 06:43 PM
                                                                  OoO instruction windowanon04/17/17 07:57 PM
                                                                    OoO instruction windowMaynard Handley04/17/17 10:16 PM
                                                                      OoO instruction windowanon04/18/17 02:51 AM
                                                                        OoO instruction windowwumpus04/19/17 07:16 AM
                                                                    Initiating post-return loads earlyPaul A. Clayton04/18/17 08:39 AM
                                                                      Initiating post-return loads earlyanon04/18/17 06:28 PM
                                                                        Software assisted prefetchingPaul A. Clayton04/18/17 08:13 PM
                                                                          Software assisted prefetchingMaynard Handley04/18/17 10:04 PM
                                                                            Software assisted prefetchingMichael S04/19/17 01:49 AM
                                                              fractional bitsUngo04/17/17 08:03 PM
                                                            fractional bitsMegol04/16/17 02:33 PM
                                                              fractional bitsRichardC04/16/17 02:43 PM
                                                          fractional bitsBrett04/15/17 12:48 PM
                                                            RISC warsMichael S04/15/17 01:04 PM
                                                              RISC warsBrett04/15/17 04:18 PM
                                                                RISC warsdmcq04/16/17 04:36 AM
                                                                  RISC warsBrett04/16/17 03:02 PM
                                                                    RISC warsMaynard Handley04/16/17 05:48 PM
                                                                      RISC warsBrett04/16/17 07:56 PM
                                                                        RISC warsMaynard Handley04/16/17 09:45 PM
                                                                          RISC warsBrett04/17/17 01:51 AM
                                                                      RISC warsSimon Farnsworth04/17/17 05:51 AM
                                                                        RISC warsdmcq04/17/17 06:24 AM
                                                                          RISC warsBrett04/22/17 02:36 PM
                                                                            RISC warsMaynard Handley04/22/17 03:14 PM
                                                                              RISC warsBrett04/22/17 05:54 PM
                                                                                RISC warsMaynard Handley04/22/17 09:17 PM
                                                                    RISC warsdmcq04/17/17 02:55 AM
                                                    Fractional bits for instruction encodingdmcq04/13/17 06:35 AM
                                                      Sounds like a FP counter with random rounding (NT)Paul A. Clayton04/13/17 07:08 PM
                                                        Sounds like a FP counter with random roundingdmcq04/14/17 12:35 PM
                                          RISC *was* science, not religionMegol04/12/17 03:13 PM
                                            Mill load buffer and spillPaul A. Clayton04/12/17 07:02 PM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/09/17 03:51 AM
                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/09/17 08:30 AM
                  ARM vs RISC religionHeikki Kultala04/04/17 07:58 AM
                    religious vs atheist or SF Bay Area vs Rest of the World (NT)Michael S04/04/17 08:25 AM
                    ARM vs RISC religionRichardC04/04/17 08:44 AM
                      ARM vs RISC religionEtienne04/04/17 09:22 AM
                        ARM vs RISC religionRichardC04/04/17 09:39 AM
                          ARM vs RISC religionExophase04/04/17 07:54 PM
                            that's a neat trick! (NT)RichardC04/04/17 08:34 PM
                    ARM vs RISC religiondmcq04/04/17 09:37 AM
                    ARM vs RISC religionwumpus04/05/17 07:14 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/04/17 09:14 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/04/17 03:12 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/04/17 03:14 PM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionLinus Torvalds04/04/17 11:10 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/04/17 11:24 AM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionExophase04/04/17 10:05 PM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/05/17 01:58 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionExophase04/05/17 11:07 AM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/05/17 03:38 PM
                          Load delay slot new value after cache missPaul A. Clayton04/06/17 10:29 AM
                            Load delay slot new value after cache missExophase04/06/17 03:05 PM
                      unspcified behaviour load delay slot pessimalityHeikki Kultala04/04/17 11:14 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionSimon Farnsworth04/06/17 05:18 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC04/06/17 09:54 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionSimon Farnsworth04/06/17 11:51 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq04/06/17 03:55 PM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionEtienne04/07/17 04:36 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC04/04/17 11:58 AM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/04/17 03:20 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/04/17 03:40 PM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko04/05/17 12:52 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/05/17 01:04 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religiongallier204/05/17 05:06 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC04/05/17 09:14 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionSimon Farnsworth04/05/17 11:01 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionSeni04/05/17 12:26 PM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionDavid Hess04/05/17 11:36 PM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC04/06/17 12:32 PM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionExophase04/06/17 03:07 PM
                                RISC *was* science, not religionLinus Torvalds04/06/17 03:27 PM
                                  Intel x86 registers to the rescue!Mark Roulo04/06/17 03:45 PM
                                    Intel x86 registers to the rescue!Linus Torvalds04/06/17 04:25 PM
                                      Intel x86 registers to the rescue!John Yates04/06/17 05:51 PM
                                      Intel x86 registers to the rescue!David Hess04/08/17 06:49 AM
                                        Intel x86 registers to the rescue!Ireland04/08/17 04:47 PM
                                          Intel x86 registers to the rescue!wumpus04/08/17 06:51 PM
                                            Intel x86 registers to the rescue!David Hess04/09/17 03:57 PM
                                        Memory laneJohn Yates04/11/17 02:24 PM
                                          Memory lanesomeone04/12/17 06:27 AM
                                            Memory laneJohn Yates04/12/17 03:01 PM
                                          Memory laneIreland04/12/17 11:23 AM
                                    Intel x86 registers to the rescue!dmcq04/07/17 12:47 AM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionDavid Hess04/08/17 06:16 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religiongallier204/05/17 11:49 PM
                            6502 = accumulator machine (NT)Wilco04/06/17 03:22 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religiongallier204/06/17 12:12 AM
                            same difference ...RichardC04/06/17 12:57 PM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionRonald Maas04/04/17 09:04 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq04/05/17 12:03 PM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionAdrian04/05/17 02:24 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religiongallier204/06/17 12:33 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionRonald Maas04/08/17 09:07 AM
                    RISC *was* science, not religionJohn Yates04/05/17 03:39 PM
                      RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC04/07/17 03:30 PM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionwumpus04/08/17 08:41 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionLinus Torvalds04/08/17 11:43 AM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/08/17 08:53 PM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionLinus Torvalds04/09/17 08:52 AM
                            VAX/VMS compatibilityRichardC04/09/17 07:54 AM
                              VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland04/09/17 08:19 AM
                              VAX/VMS compatibilityMichael S04/09/17 08:20 AM
                                VAX/VMS compatibilityRichardC04/09/17 08:32 AM
                                  VAX/VMS compatibilitydmcq04/09/17 08:47 AM
                                    I suppose, you are only familiar with British mainfraimes (NT)Michael S04/09/17 08:55 AM
                                      I suppose, you are only familiar with British mainfraimesdmcq04/09/17 05:12 PM
                                    VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland04/09/17 09:08 AM
                                    VAX/VMS compatibilityrwessel04/09/17 09:51 AM
                                      VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland04/09/17 12:35 PM
                                        VAX/VMS compatibilityanon04/09/17 06:24 PM
                                          VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland04/09/17 06:47 PM
                                            VAX/VMS compatibilityanon04/09/17 07:29 PM
                                              VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland04/09/17 07:43 PM
                                              Ireland = AI botanonymou504/10/17 05:21 AM
                                                That joke is getting old (NT)Anon04/11/17 01:23 AM
                                                  It isn't 100% a joke.Mark Roulo04/11/17 07:13 AM
                                                    It isn't 100% a joke.Michael_S04/11/17 10:19 AM
                                                      It isn't 100% a joke.Ireland04/11/17 10:48 AM
                                                      It isn't 100% a joke.anonymou504/12/17 09:40 PM
                                                    It isn't 100% a joke.Dan Downs04/11/17 04:05 PM
                                                      Shaka, when the walls fell (NT)Darmok04/12/17 12:19 AM
                                                      It isn't 100% a joke.Brendan04/13/17 05:34 AM
                                                        Can Someone Fix "Greater Than/Less Than" Handling Bugs??Brendan04/13/17 05:38 AM
                                                          6th decadeMichael S04/13/17 06:34 AM
                                                            6th decadeIreland04/13/17 10:17 AM
                                                        It isn't 100% a joke.Gabriele Svelto04/15/17 08:14 AM
                                                          It isn't 100% a joke.dmcq04/16/17 05:09 AM
                                                            It isn't 100% a joke.Brendan04/16/17 03:01 PM
                                                              The less loquacious left it alone (NT)Anon04/18/17 12:49 AM
                                                To Wit, many here..John H04/12/17 11:40 AM
                                                  To Wit, many here..Ireland04/12/17 11:54 AM
                                      VAX/VMS compatibilitydmcq04/09/17 05:02 PM
                                        VAX/VMS compatibilityIreland04/09/17 05:19 PM
                                        VAX/VMS compatibilityrwessel04/09/17 10:20 PM
                                          VAX/VMS compatibilitywumpus04/10/17 06:14 AM
                                            VAX/VMS compatibilityrwessel04/10/17 08:10 AM
                                            VAX/VMS compatibilitydmcq04/10/17 10:11 AM
                                          VAX/VMS compatibilityJohn Yates04/12/17 07:42 PM
                                            VAX/VMS compatibilityrwessel04/12/17 09:19 PM
                                    VAX/VMS compatibilityJohn Yates04/12/17 09:41 PM
                                      VAX/VMS development - thank you, JohnMichael S04/13/17 04:54 AM
                                        VAX/VMS development - thank you, JohnRob Thorpe04/14/17 08:19 AM
                                          VAX/VMS development - thank you, JohnJohn Yates04/14/17 04:20 PM
                                      VAX/VMS compatibilitydmcq04/13/17 06:23 AM
                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/08/17 11:04 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/08/17 12:01 PM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionwumpus04/08/17 05:57 PM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/09/17 10:49 AM
                          RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B04/09/17 04:15 PM
                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/09/17 11:07 PM
                              RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B04/10/17 02:17 AM
                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/10/17 09:01 AM
                                  RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B04/10/17 11:27 AM
                                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/10/17 03:25 PM
                                      RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B04/10/17 05:12 PM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon.104/10/17 10:54 PM
                                          RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B04/11/17 03:14 AM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq04/11/17 03:44 AM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon.104/11/17 09:03 AM
                                              RISC *was* science, not religionWilco04/11/17 02:04 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/11/17 09:07 PM
                                              RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B04/11/17 02:15 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionrwessel04/11/17 05:38 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/11/17 08:36 PM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B04/12/17 02:01 AM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionGabriele Svelto04/12/17 02:38 AM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionTravis04/12/17 12:20 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon.104/11/17 10:54 PM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B04/12/17 01:52 AM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq04/12/17 04:27 AM
                                                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon.104/12/17 08:43 AM
                                                      RISC *was* science, not religionanon.104/12/17 11:03 AM
                                              RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/11/17 02:32 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon.104/11/17 10:45 PM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/12/17 10:07 AM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religiongpd04/12/17 02:31 AM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionTravis04/12/17 11:16 AM
                                                    RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/12/17 11:27 AM
                                                      RISC *was* science, not religionTravis04/12/17 12:02 PM
                                                        RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/12/17 12:46 PM
                                                          RISC *was* science, not religionTravis04/12/17 03:41 PM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionTravis04/12/17 11:33 AM
                                                  RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/12/17 12:56 PM
                                                    RISC *was* science, not religionTravis04/12/17 04:22 PM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/11/17 12:08 PM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/11/17 02:10 AM
                                          RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B04/11/17 03:28 AM
                                            RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/11/17 04:46 AM
                                              RISC *was* science, not religionmatthew04/11/17 08:59 AM
                                                RISC *was* science, not religionanon04/11/17 01:28 PM
                                        RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/11/17 11:41 AM
                                    RISC *was* science, not religionanon.104/10/17 08:03 PM
                                      RISC *was* science, not religionRicardo B04/11/17 03:47 AM
              RISC *was* science, not religionbakaneko04/03/17 11:45 PM
                RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/04/17 01:45 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/04/17 09:30 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religiondmcq04/04/17 09:43 AM
              RISC *was* science, not religionDavid Hess04/05/17 02:18 AM
                RISC *was* science, not religionMichael S04/05/17 04:02 AM
            RISC *was* science, not religionDavid Hess04/05/17 01:54 AM
              RISC *was* science, not religionRichardC04/05/17 04:31 AM
                ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Heikki Kultala04/05/17 05:23 AM
                  ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?dmcq04/05/17 07:34 AM
                    MIPS condition evaluation?Heikki Kultala04/05/17 08:28 AM
                      MIPS condition evaluation?Michael S04/05/17 10:28 AM
                        MIPS condition evaluation?Heikki Kultala04/05/17 10:55 AM
                          MIPS condition evaluation?Michael S04/05/17 12:12 PM
                            MIPS condition evaluation?Heikki Kultala04/05/17 12:54 PM
                              MIPS condition evaluation?dmcq04/05/17 01:02 PM
                              MIPS condition evaluation?Heikki Kultala04/05/17 01:03 PM
                  ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?RichardC04/05/17 09:18 AM
                    ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds04/05/17 11:20 AM
                      ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?RichardC04/05/17 01:23 PM
                        ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds04/05/17 05:51 PM
                          ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?RichardC04/05/17 09:06 PM
                            TransputerRichardC04/06/17 05:20 AM
                            ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds04/06/17 08:54 AM
                              ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?RichardC04/06/17 11:14 AM
                                ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds04/06/17 11:40 AM
                                  ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?RichardC04/06/17 12:01 PM
                                    your theoryRichardC04/06/17 01:49 PM
                                      your theoryLinus Torvalds04/06/17 02:39 PM
                                        your theoryLinus Torvalds04/06/17 03:04 PM
                                          your theoryIreland04/06/17 03:48 PM
                                            Integrators of RISC cpu's interested only in software app salesIreland04/06/17 05:11 PM
                                          cheap machines with GUIsRichardC04/07/17 04:40 AM
                                            compatibility and evolutionary strategyRichardC04/07/17 06:27 AM
                                              68K clones?Michael S04/07/17 06:40 AM
                                                68K clones?Yuhong Bao04/07/17 07:54 AM
                                                Apollo core ...Mark Roulo04/07/17 10:28 AM
                                                68K clones?Ronald Maas04/07/17 06:07 PM
                                                68K clones?Per Hesselgren04/08/17 01:05 AM
                                                  68K clones?Per Hesselgren04/08/17 01:06 AM
                                                    68K clones?Michael S04/08/17 12:10 PM
                                              compatibility and evolutionary strategyIreland04/07/17 09:33 AM
                                              compatibility and evolutionary strategyIreland04/07/17 09:50 AM
                                                high-margin productsRichardC04/07/17 10:16 AM
                                                  high-margin productsIreland04/07/17 02:53 PM
                                                    high-margin productswumpus04/08/17 07:45 PM
                                                      high-margin productsRichardC04/09/17 06:06 AM
                                                        high-margin productsMichael S04/09/17 06:26 AM
                                                          high-margin productsIreland04/09/17 07:13 AM
                                                            high-margin productswumpus04/09/17 10:01 AM
                                                          user-visible ISA's still evolvingRichardC04/09/17 08:09 AM
                                                            user-visible ISA's still evolvingIreland04/09/17 03:08 PM
                                                      Economics and doing a MIPS, SGI or 3dfx startup today . . . Ireland04/09/17 08:08 AM
                                                        Economics and doing a MIPS, SGI or 3dfx startup today . . . bakaneko04/09/17 10:45 AM
                                                          Economics and doing a MIPS, SGI or 3dfx startup today . . . Ireland04/09/17 01:32 PM
                                        your theoryRichardC04/06/17 04:57 PM
                                          your theoryIreland04/06/17 05:29 PM
                                            your theoryIreland04/06/17 05:45 PM
                                          x86 ISA license historyRichardC04/06/17 05:31 PM
                                            x86 ISA license historywumpus04/07/17 07:35 AM
                                              x86 ISA license historyRichardC04/07/17 09:26 AM
                                          370 on 68KMatt Sayler04/06/17 05:38 PM
                                            370 on 68KDavid Hess04/08/17 10:18 AM
                                          your theoryLinus Torvalds04/06/17 07:20 PM
                                            your theoryRichardC04/06/17 08:34 PM
                                              Intel's clone warsRichardC04/06/17 08:42 PM
                                              your theoryIreland04/07/17 09:05 AM
                                            your theoryrwessel04/06/17 10:53 PM
                                            your theorygallier204/07/17 02:13 AM
                                            your theorygallier204/07/17 02:37 AM
                                              your theoryMichael S04/07/17 05:54 AM
                                                your theorygallier204/07/17 09:57 AM
                                              your theoryDavid Hess04/08/17 10:26 AM
                                                your theoryYuhong Bao04/08/17 10:28 AM
                                                your theorygallier204/09/17 05:38 AM
                                                  your theoryMichael S04/09/17 06:08 AM
                                                    your theoryrwessel04/09/17 10:04 AM
                                                      your theoryDavid Hess04/09/17 04:46 PM
                                                        your theoryrwessel04/09/17 08:58 PM
                                                  your theoryDavid Hess04/09/17 04:23 PM
                                                your theoryRichardC04/09/17 08:16 AM
                                                  your theoryDavid Hess04/09/17 04:58 PM
                                            Positive point about 80286Michael S04/07/17 06:31 AM
                                              Positive point about 80286gallier204/07/17 10:00 AM
                                                Positive point about 80286Yuhong Bao04/07/17 02:43 PM
                                                  Positive point about 80286Per Hesselgren04/08/17 01:16 AM
                                                Positive point about 80286David Hess04/08/17 10:49 AM
                                                  Positive point about 80286gallier204/09/17 05:44 AM
                                                    Positive point about 80286Ireland04/09/17 06:35 AM
                                                      Positive point about 80286gallier204/09/17 07:18 AM
                                                        Positive point about 80286Ireland04/09/17 07:30 AM
                                                          Positive point about 80286gallier204/09/17 10:43 AM
                                                            Positive point about 80286David Hess04/09/17 05:19 PM
                                                              Positive point about 80286Ireland04/09/17 05:24 PM
                                                                Positive point about 80286David Hess04/09/17 06:01 PM
                                                                  Positive point about 80286Ireland04/09/17 06:15 PM
                                                              Positive point about 80286 and MotorolaPer Hesselgren04/10/17 12:22 AM
                                                                Positive point about 80286 and MotorolaPer Hesselgren04/10/17 01:01 AM
                                                                  Positive point about 80286 and MotorolaPer Hesselgren04/10/17 01:39 PM
                                                                    Positive point about 80286 and MotorolaPer Hesselgren04/18/17 09:14 AM
                                                              Positive point about 80286gallier204/10/17 12:26 AM
                                                                Positive point about 80286Michael_S04/10/17 03:21 AM
                                                        Positive point about 80286David Hess04/09/17 05:11 PM
                                                          Positive point about 80286gallier204/10/17 01:15 AM
                                                            Positive point about 80286gallier204/10/17 01:20 AM
                                                    Positive point about 80286rwessel04/09/17 10:12 AM
                                                      Positive point about 80286gallier204/09/17 11:38 AM
                                                        Positive point about 80286Ireland04/09/17 12:17 PM
                                                          Positive point about 80286David Hess04/09/17 05:40 PM
                                                            Positive point about 80286Ireland04/09/17 05:48 PM
                                                          Positive point about 80286rwessel04/09/17 11:05 PM
                                                            Positive point about 80286wumpus04/10/17 06:31 AM
                                                              Positive point about 80286rwessel04/10/17 07:37 AM
                                                                Positive point about 80286David Hess04/10/17 09:53 AM
                                                        Positive point about 80286David Hess04/09/17 05:51 PM
                                                          Positive point about 80286wumpus04/11/17 06:41 AM
                                                            Positive point about 80286gallier204/12/17 04:20 AM
                                                          Positive point about 80286Yuhong Bao04/17/17 01:14 AM
                                                            Positive point about 80286David Hess04/17/17 02:37 AM
                                                              Positive point about 80286Joe Hodge04/17/17 06:54 PM
                                                    Positive point about 80286David Hess04/09/17 05:05 PM
                                                      Positive point about 80286Ireland04/09/17 05:13 PM
                                                        Positive point about 80286wumpus04/09/17 05:22 PM
                                                          Positive point about 80286Ireland04/09/17 05:43 PM
                                                            Positive point about 80286Ireland04/09/17 05:59 PM
                                                  Positive point about 80286wumpus04/09/17 05:17 PM
                                                    Positive point about 80286Ireland04/09/17 05:20 PM
                                        your theorydmcq04/07/17 01:04 AM
                                        your theoryGabriele Svelto04/09/17 01:47 PM
                                          your theoryIreland04/09/17 05:53 PM
                                          your theoryrwessel04/09/17 11:24 PM
                                  ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Doug S04/07/17 11:24 AM
                                    ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds04/07/17 11:50 AM
                                      ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Doug S04/10/17 09:58 PM
                                ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Tim McCaffrey04/06/17 06:32 PM
                          ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Doug S04/05/17 11:58 PM
                            Are you sure about orders of magnitude? (NT)Michael S04/06/17 03:24 AM
                        ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Tim McCaffrey04/06/17 06:21 PM
                      ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?somebody04/06/17 09:41 AM
                        ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds04/06/17 12:01 PM
                          ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Wilco04/06/17 07:17 PM
                            ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds04/07/17 11:35 AM
                              ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds04/07/17 12:20 PM
                              ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Exophase04/07/17 01:22 PM
                                ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Linus Torvalds04/08/17 01:32 AM
                                  Software FP vs trap emulationWilco04/08/17 05:20 AM
                                    Software FP vs trap emulationRonald Maas04/08/17 08:45 AM
                                      Software FP vs trap emulationdmcq04/08/17 10:29 AM
                                        Software FP vs trap emulationdmcq04/08/17 10:44 AM
                                          Software FP vs trap emulationWilco04/08/17 05:24 PM
                                        Software FP vs trap emulationLinus Torvalds04/08/17 10:52 AM
                                          Software FP vs trap emulationIreland04/08/17 11:46 AM
                                          Software FP vs trap emulationMichael S04/08/17 01:23 PM
                                            Software FP vs trap emulationLinus Torvalds04/08/17 03:38 PM
                                              Software FP vs trap emulationMichael S04/08/17 04:23 PM
                                          Software FP vs trap emulation@04/08/17 06:17 PM
                                            Software FP vs trap emulationLinus Torvalds04/09/17 08:59 AM
                                              Software FP vs trap emulationIreland04/09/17 09:20 AM
                                                Software FP vs trap emulationIreland04/09/17 09:35 AM
                                                Software FP vs trap emulationrwessel04/09/17 10:27 AM
                                                  Software FP vs trap emulationIreland04/09/17 01:49 PM
                                              Software FP vs trap emulation@04/09/17 11:59 AM
                                    Software FP vs trap emulationMichael S04/08/17 12:46 PM
                                      Software FP vs trap emulationWilco04/08/17 05:01 PM
                                        Software FP vs trap emulationBrett04/08/17 11:30 PM
                                          Software FP vs trap emulationmatthew04/09/17 01:14 AM
                                            Software FP vs trap emulationWilco04/09/17 07:10 AM
                                  Acorn vs DECRichardC04/09/17 08:27 AM
                                  ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Exophase04/09/17 01:02 PM
                                    ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Wilco04/09/17 02:52 PM
                                      ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Exophase04/09/17 06:16 PM
                                        ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Wilco04/10/17 01:40 AM
                                          ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Exophase04/10/17 01:00 PM
                                            ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Wilco04/10/17 04:19 PM
                              ARM solution and MIPS condition evaluation?Ireland04/07/17 05:34 PM
                RISC *was* science, not religionDavid Hess04/06/17 12:24 AM
                  RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/06/17 09:54 AM
              RISC *was* science, not religionIreland04/05/17 01:23 PM
            CISC religion?wumpus04/08/17 09:49 AM
              CISC religion?Ireland04/08/17 01:24 PM
              CISC religion?Ireland04/08/17 01:39 PM
                Alan Turing Ireland04/08/17 05:31 PM
                  Alan Turing rwessel04/08/17 09:52 PM
                    Alan Turing Ireland04/09/17 05:35 AM
                CISC religion?wumpus04/08/17 07:19 PM
                  narrow vs wide skillsetsRichardC04/08/17 07:42 PM
                  CISC religion?rwessel04/08/17 09:33 PM
                    CISC religion?wumpus04/09/17 05:10 PM
                      CISC religion?David Hess04/09/17 07:56 PM
                        CISC religion?rwessel04/10/17 12:25 AM
              CISC religion?RichardC04/08/17 03:44 PM
                CISC religion?Michael S04/08/17 04:47 PM
                  CISC religion?Michael S04/08/17 04:52 PM
                    CISC religion?Ireland04/08/17 05:16 PM
                      CISC religion?Michael S04/08/17 05:26 PM
                        CISC religion?Ireland04/08/17 05:41 PM
                          CISC religion?wumpus04/08/17 08:04 PM
                            OT - faster RAMMichael S04/09/17 05:26 AM
                          CISC religion?rwessel04/08/17 10:10 PM
                            CISC religion?rwessel04/08/17 10:10 PM
                      gone parallel now ...RichardC04/08/17 07:15 PM
                CISC religion?gallier204/09/17 06:47 AM
                  fascinating link, thanks! (NT)RichardC04/09/17 09:46 AM
                CISC religion?Ricardo B04/10/17 05:55 AM
                  CISC religion?anon04/10/17 09:49 AM
                    CISC religion?Travis04/10/17 11:30 AM
                      CISC religion?Travis04/10/17 11:32 AM
                        CISC religion?anon04/10/17 02:12 PM
                          CISC religion?Travis04/10/17 07:41 PM
                            CISC religion?Michael_S04/11/17 10:44 AM
                      CISC religion?Ricardo B04/10/17 04:01 PM
                        CISC religion?Michael_S04/11/17 10:56 AM
                          CISC religion?Ricardo B04/11/17 01:27 PM
                        CISC religion?Wilco04/11/17 01:45 PM
                          CISC religion?Michael S04/11/17 02:07 PM
                          CISC religion?Ricardo B04/11/17 04:32 PM
                    CISC religion?Ricardo B04/10/17 04:24 PM
                  CISC religion?dmcq04/10/17 02:17 PM
                    CISC religion?Ricardo B04/10/17 05:16 PM
              CISC religion?Seni04/09/17 04:06 AM
                CISC religion?Ireland04/09/17 05:40 AM
                  CISC religion?wumpus04/09/17 10:08 AM
                yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheRichardC04/09/17 05:50 AM
                  yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheSeni04/09/17 06:19 AM
                    yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheRichardC04/09/17 08:47 AM
                      minimal microcodeRichardC04/09/17 09:33 AM
                        minimal microcodeSeni04/09/17 10:02 AM
                          interesting, that makes sense (NT)RichardC04/09/17 02:45 PM
                      yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheanon04/09/17 08:57 PM
                        yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheRichardC04/10/17 06:18 AM
                          yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheSeni04/10/17 03:51 PM
                            yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheWilco04/11/17 02:56 AM
                              yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cachedmcq04/11/17 03:06 AM
                                no, ARM's 42 rows x 36 bits = 189 bytes (NT)RichardC04/11/17 08:11 AM
                                  no, ARM's 42 rows x 36 bits = 189 bytesdmcq04/12/17 04:42 AM
                              yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheSeni04/11/17 12:27 PM
                                yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacherwessel04/11/17 06:02 PM
                                  yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheSeni04/11/17 10:27 PM
                                    yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheRichardC04/12/17 11:06 AM
                                      yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheSeni04/12/17 12:47 PM
                                        yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheWilco04/12/17 01:38 PM
                                        not the normal usageRichardC04/12/17 07:58 PM
                                        yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacherwessel04/12/17 09:40 PM
                                    yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cachedmcq04/12/17 02:19 PM
                                      yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacherwessel04/12/17 09:49 PM
                                        yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cachedmcq04/13/17 03:44 AM
                                    yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cacheanon04/12/17 08:06 PM
                        yes, except ARM and SPARC lacked cachewumpus04/10/17 06:37 AM
  Apple confirms that they are ditching Imagination within two yearsAnon04/03/17 02:36 AM
    Apple confirms that they are ditching Imagination within two yearsDoug S04/03/17 12:56 PM
      Or Samsung buys them, develops their own GPU, and uses the patents in the next lawsuit (NT)Anon04/03/17 01:26 PM
        Or Samsung buys them, develops their own GPU, and uses the patents in the next lawsuit Michael S04/03/17 02:33 PM
        Or ARM buys them, and gets any money they can from their IP and customersdmcq04/04/17 09:55 AM
  IMGTEC stock has crashed already.VertexMaster04/03/17 05:33 AM
    IMGTEC stock has crashed already.Andreas04/03/17 07:33 AM
      IMGTEC stock has crashed already.Exophase04/03/17 09:43 AM
    IMGTEC stock has crashed already.Doug S04/03/17 12:51 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell green?