Building a Cool and Quiet PC

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Table of results

As you can see below, the PLE133 failed some of the more graphic intensive tests and that is to be expected because it just doesn’t satisfy all the requirements of the test, but that is just not the market for that chipset. It is interesting to see that in the 3D Winbench 2000 and 3D Mark 2001 tests that the GeForce II MX has a significant advantage over the PM133, but not in the Unreal Tournament test. At the resolution tested, neither of the graphics had enough power to really play the game, all due to the CPU. But lower the resolution and the GeForce II will just barely do.

Mainboard

Asus CUV4X-V

Asus CUV4X-V

Soyo 7VEM

BIOS

1003

1003

2AA3

Video

VIA PM133

GF II MX 200

VIA PLE133

CPU

C3 800

C3 800

C3 800

Chipset

VIA PM133

VIA PM133

VIA PLE133

FSB

133MHz

133MHz

133MHz

Memory

PC133

PC133

PC133

Winstone 2001

Business

21.5

22.4

21

Content Creation

20.2

20.5

18.7

3D Winbench 2000

Score

28

74.1

Fail

CPU

0.742

0.778

Winbench 99

CPUmark 99

42.9

47.5

43.2

FPU Winmark

1550

1560

1550

Business Disk

5700

6130

5840

High Disk

17700

18700

17400

Business Graphics

227

295

189

High Graphics

696

762

575

3D Mark 2001

Score

245

921

Fail

Game 1 Low

3.8

17.6

Game 1 High

0.5

4.2

Game 2 Low

4.8

15.6

Game 2 High

1.7

8.1

Game 3 Low

0.54

16.3

Game 3 High

3

9.1

Quake III Demo 1

29.8

48.9

13.8

Unreal Tournament – UTBench 800×600/16

12.17

17.15

Fail

Final Reality

Score

3.43

4.3

3.42

2D

3.9

4.34

3.47

3D

3.29

3.87

3.7

Bus

3.02

5.81

2.27

AGP

80.49

102.17

96.44

Video2000

285

410

220


Pages: « Prev   1 2 3 4 5 6 7   Next »

Be the first to discuss this article!