Table of results
As you can see below, the PLE133 failed some of the more graphic intensive tests and that is to be expected because it just doesn’t satisfy all the requirements of the test, but that is just not the market for that chipset. It is interesting to see that in the 3D Winbench 2000 and 3D Mark 2001 tests that the GeForce II MX has a significant advantage over the PM133, but not in the Unreal Tournament test. At the resolution tested, neither of the graphics had enough power to really play the game, all due to the CPU. But lower the resolution and the GeForce II will just barely do.
|
Mainboard |
Asus CUV4X-V |
Asus CUV4X-V |
Soyo 7VEM |
|
BIOS |
1003 |
1003 |
2AA3 |
|
Video |
VIA PM133 |
GF II MX 200 |
VIA PLE133 |
|
CPU |
C3 800 |
C3 800 |
C3 800 |
|
Chipset |
VIA PM133 |
VIA PM133 |
VIA PLE133 |
|
FSB |
133MHz |
133MHz |
133MHz |
|
Memory |
PC133 |
PC133 |
PC133 |
|
Winstone 2001 | |||
|
Business |
21.5 |
22.4 |
21 |
|
Content Creation |
20.2 |
20.5 |
18.7 |
|
3D Winbench 2000 | |||
|
Score |
28 |
74.1 |
Fail |
|
CPU |
0.742 |
0.778 | |
|
Winbench 99 | |||
|
CPUmark 99 |
42.9 |
47.5 |
43.2 |
|
FPU Winmark |
1550 |
1560 |
1550 |
|
Business Disk |
5700 |
6130 |
5840 |
|
High Disk |
17700 |
18700 |
17400 |
|
Business Graphics |
227 |
295 |
189 |
|
High Graphics |
696 |
762 |
575 |
|
3D Mark 2001 | |||
|
Score |
245 |
921 |
Fail |
|
Game 1 Low |
3.8 |
17.6 | |
|
Game 1 High |
0.5 |
4.2 | |
|
Game 2 Low |
4.8 |
15.6 | |
|
Game 2 High |
1.7 |
8.1 | |
|
Game 3 Low |
0.54 |
16.3 | |
|
Game 3 High |
3 |
9.1 | |
|
Quake III Demo 1 |
29.8 |
48.9 |
13.8 |
|
Unreal Tournament – UTBench 800×600/16 |
12.17 |
17.15 |
Fail |
|
Final Reality | |||
|
Score |
3.43 |
4.3 |
3.42 |
|
2D |
3.9 |
4.34 |
3.47 |
|
3D |
3.29 |
3.87 |
3.7 |
|
Bus |
3.02 |
5.81 |
2.27 |
|
AGP |
80.49 |
102.17 |
96.44 |
|
Video2000 |
285 |
410 |
220 |
Pages: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Be the first to discuss this article!