dev (dev@kerenls.org) on 6/30/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>>LOL. Are you from marketing department? Every sentence you said is either wrong, meaningless, or unsubstantiated.
>>
>
>Stop laughing and try to back up your insightful comment with more than one sentence.
>
>Waiting for your pearls of wisdom with bated breath...

Hah, me back up my comments? That's rich. You would like me to back up my criticism of your empty comments?

> C is a crappy language.

Unsubstantiated by the rest of your statements; see below.

>Not expressive enough to reduce LOC.

What does this mean? How expressive is enough? Reduce LOC compared with what? What reduction in LOC is sufficient for you, and why?

> Not precise enough that real stuff still have to be done in assembly.

This is doesn't mean anything. "Precise"? (what do you mean? not well defined? not expressive? calculations certainly are precise as they are defined...). Even as hyperbole it is silly. Most things you can do with C and POSIX C. Memory model may not have been totally well defined, but that is being improved, and with common sense implementations and locking libraries etc. in practice it works fine.

> Not safe.

More jibberish. You mean, not type safe?

> Doesn't interact well with tools.

What does this mean? There are lots of perfectly good tools for C.

> Doesn't support design methodologies.

Jibberish.

> The list goes on.

Yeah, the list of stupid statements goes on.