Article: PhysX87: Software Deficiency
By: Matt Sayler (sayler.delete@this.thewalrus.org), July 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
slacker (s@lack.er) on 7/20/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>? (0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com) on 7/20/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Even mere pipelining entails a small dose of speculative execution !!!
>
>What speculative execution occurs on the i486?
Does a speculative fetch (jump target) count?
---------------------------
>? (0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com) on 7/20/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Even mere pipelining entails a small dose of speculative execution !!!
>
>What speculative execution occurs on the i486?
Does a speculative fetch (jump target) count?
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
A bit off base | John Mann | 2010/07/07 06:04 AM |
A bit off base | David Kanter | 2010/07/07 10:28 AM |
SSE vs x87 | Joel Hruska | 2010/07/07 11:53 AM |
SSE vs x87 | Michael S | 2010/07/07 12:07 PM |
SSE vs x87 | hobold | 2010/07/08 04:12 AM |
SSE vs x87 | David Kanter | 2010/07/07 01:55 PM |
SSE vs x87 | Andi Kleen | 2010/07/08 01:43 AM |
80 bit FP | Ricardo B | 2010/07/08 06:35 AM |
80 bit FP | David Kanter | 2010/07/08 10:14 AM |
80 bit FP | Kevin G | 2010/07/08 01:12 PM |
80 bit FP | Ian Ollmann | 2010/07/18 11:49 PM |
80 bit FP | David Kanter | 2010/07/19 10:33 AM |
80 bit FP | Anil Maliyekkel | 2010/07/19 03:49 PM |
80 bit FP | rwessel | 2010/07/19 04:41 PM |
80 bit FP | Matt Waldhauer | 2010/07/21 10:11 AM |
80 bit FP | Emil Briggs | 2010/07/22 08:06 AM |
A bit off base | John Mann | 2010/07/08 10:06 AM |
A bit off base | David Kanter | 2010/07/08 10:27 AM |
A bit off base | Ian Ameline | 2010/07/09 09:10 AM |
A bit off base | Michael S | 2010/07/10 01:13 PM |
A bit off base | Ian Ameline | 2010/07/11 06:51 AM |
A bit off base | David Kanter | 2010/07/07 08:46 PM |
A bit off base | Anon | 2010/07/07 11:47 PM |
A bit off base | anon | 2010/07/08 01:15 AM |
A bit off base | Gabriele Svelto | 2010/07/08 03:11 AM |
Physics engine history | Peter Clare | 2010/07/08 03:49 AM |
Physics engine history | Null Pointer Exception | 2010/07/08 05:07 AM |
Physics engine history | Ralf | 2010/07/08 02:09 PM |
Physics engine history | David Kanter | 2010/07/08 03:16 PM |
Physics engine history | sJ | 2010/07/08 10:36 PM |
Physics engine history | Gabriele Svelto | 2010/07/08 11:59 PM |
Physics engine history | sJ | 2010/07/13 05:35 AM |
Physics engine history | David Kanter | 2010/07/09 08:25 AM |
Physics engine history | sJ | 2010/07/13 05:49 AM |
Physics engine history | fvdbergh | 2010/07/13 06:27 AM |
A bit off base | John Mann | 2010/07/08 10:11 AM |
A bit off base | David Kanter | 2010/07/08 10:31 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | anon | 2010/07/08 06:10 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | David Kanter | 2010/07/08 06:53 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Aaron Spink | 2010/07/08 08:05 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | anon | 2010/07/08 08:31 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Aaron Spink | 2010/07/08 09:43 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | David Kanter | 2010/07/08 10:27 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Ian Ollmann | 2010/07/19 12:14 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | anon | 2010/07/19 05:39 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | hobold | 2010/07/19 06:26 AM |
Philosophy for achieving peak | David Kanter | 2010/07/19 10:49 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Linus Torvalds | 2010/07/19 06:36 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Richard Cownie | 2010/07/19 07:42 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Aaron Spink | 2010/07/19 07:56 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | hobold | 2010/07/19 08:30 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Groo | 2010/07/19 01:31 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | hobold | 2010/07/19 03:17 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Groo | 2010/07/19 05:18 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Anon | 2010/07/19 05:18 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Mark Roulo | 2010/07/19 10:47 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | slacker | 2010/07/19 11:55 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Mark Roulo | 2010/07/19 12:00 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | anonymous42 | 2010/07/25 11:31 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Richard Cownie | 2010/07/19 11:41 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Linus Torvalds | 2010/07/19 01:57 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Richard Cownie | 2010/07/19 03:10 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Richard Cownie | 2010/07/19 03:10 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | hobold | 2010/07/19 03:25 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Linus Torvalds | 2010/07/19 03:31 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Richard Cownie | 2010/07/20 05:04 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | jrl | 2010/07/20 12:18 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | anonymous42 | 2010/07/25 11:00 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | David Kanter | 2010/07/25 11:52 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Anon | 2010/07/19 05:15 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Linus Torvalds | 2010/07/19 06:27 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Anon | 2010/07/19 08:54 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | anon | 2010/07/19 10:45 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | hobold | 2010/07/19 08:14 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Linus Torvalds | 2010/07/19 10:56 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | a reader | 2010/07/21 07:16 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Linus Torvalds | 2010/07/21 08:05 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | anon | 2010/07/22 01:09 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | a reader | 2010/07/22 06:53 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | gallier2 | 2010/07/23 04:58 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | a reader | 2010/07/25 07:35 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | David Kanter | 2010/07/25 10:49 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | a reader | 2010/07/26 06:03 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Michael S | 2010/07/28 12:38 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Gabriele Svelto | 2010/07/28 12:44 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | anon | 2010/07/23 03:55 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | slacker | 2010/07/23 11:48 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | anon | 2010/07/24 01:36 AM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | Vincent Diepeveen | 2010/07/27 04:37 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | ? | 2010/07/27 10:42 PM |
150 GFLOP/s measured? | slacker | 2010/07/28 04:55 AM |
Intel's clock rate projections | AM | 2010/07/28 01:03 AM |
nostalgia ain't what it used to be | someone | 2010/07/28 04:38 AM |
Intel's clock rate projections | AM | 2010/07/28 09:12 PM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | ? | 2010/07/20 06:19 AM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | Mark Christiansen | 2010/07/20 01:26 PM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | slacker | 2010/07/20 05:04 PM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | Matt Sayler | 2010/07/20 05:10 PM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | slacker | 2010/07/20 08:37 PM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | ? | 2010/07/20 10:51 PM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | anon | 2010/07/21 01:16 AM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | ? | 2010/07/21 06:05 AM |
Software conventions | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/07/21 07:52 AM |
Software conventions | ? | 2010/07/22 04:43 AM |
Speculation | David Kanter | 2010/07/21 09:32 AM |
Pipelining affects the ISA | ? | 2010/07/22 09:58 PM |
Pipelining affects the ISA | ? | 2010/07/22 10:14 PM |
Pipelining affects the ISA | rwessel | 2010/07/22 11:03 PM |
Pipelining affects the ISA | ? | 2010/07/23 04:50 AM |
Pipelining affects the ISA | ? | 2010/07/23 05:10 AM |
Pipelining affects the ISA | Thiago Kurovski | 2010/07/23 01:59 PM |
Pipelining affects the ISA | anon | 2010/07/24 06:35 AM |
Pipelining affects the ISA | Thiago Kurovski | 2010/07/24 10:12 AM |
Pipelining affects the ISA | Gabriele Svelto | 2010/07/26 01:50 AM |
Pipelining affects the ISA | IlleglWpns | 2010/07/26 04:14 AM |
Pipelining affects the ISA | Michael S | 2010/07/26 02:33 PM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | anon | 2010/07/21 04:53 PM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | ? | 2010/07/22 03:15 AM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | anon | 2010/07/22 03:27 AM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | slacker | 2010/07/21 06:45 PM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | anon | 2010/07/22 12:57 AM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | ? | 2010/07/22 04:26 AM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | Dan Downs | 2010/07/22 07:14 AM |
Confusing and not very useful definition | David Kanter | 2010/07/22 11:41 AM |
Confusing and not very useful definition | ? | 2010/07/22 09:58 PM |
Confusing and not very useful definition | Ungo | 2010/07/24 11:06 AM |
Confusing and not very useful definition | ? | 2010/07/25 09:23 PM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | someone | 2010/07/20 07:02 PM |
Separate the OoO-ness from speculative-ness | Thiago Kurovski | 2010/07/21 03:13 PM |
You are just quoting SINGLE precision flops? OMG what planet do you live? | Vincent Diepeveen | 2010/07/19 09:26 AM |
The prior poster was talking about SP (NT) | David Kanter | 2010/07/19 10:34 AM |
All FFT's need double precision | Vincent Diepeveen | 2010/07/19 01:02 PM |
All FFT's need double precision | David Kanter | 2010/07/19 01:09 PM |
All FFT's need double precision | Vincent Diepeveen | 2010/07/19 03:06 PM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | Michael S | 2010/07/20 12:16 AM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | Ungo | 2010/07/20 11:04 PM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | Michael S | 2010/07/21 01:35 PM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | EduardoS | 2010/07/21 01:52 PM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | Anon | 2010/07/21 04:23 PM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | Ricardo B | 2010/07/26 06:46 AM |
I'm on a boat! | anon | 2010/07/22 10:42 AM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | Vincent Diepeveen | 2010/07/24 10:39 PM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | slacker | 2010/07/25 02:27 AM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | Ricardo B | 2010/07/26 06:40 AM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | EduardoS | 2010/07/25 07:37 AM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | Michael S | 2010/07/25 09:43 AM |
All FFT's need double precision - not | Vincent Diepeveen | 2010/07/24 10:19 PM |
A bit off base | EduardoS | 2010/07/08 03:08 PM |
A bit off base | Groo | 2010/07/08 05:11 PM |
A bit off base | john mann | 2010/07/08 05:58 PM |
All right...let's cool it... | David Kanter | 2010/07/08 06:54 PM |
A bit off base | Vincent Diepeveen | 2010/07/19 02:36 PM |