Tarek's Hotpar 2010 article online

Article: Parallelism at HotPar 2010
By: anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com), July 28, 2010 5:10 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Anon (no@email.com) on 7/28/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 7/28/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Anon (no@email.com) on 7/27/10 wrote:
>>---------------------------
>>>David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 7/27/10 wrote:
>>>---------------------------
>>>>Today is shaping up to be an excellent day for a number of reasons:
>>>>
>>>>We have an excellent new contributor, Tarek Chammah. Tarek is a graduate student
>>>>at the University of Waterloo who specializes in software approaches to parallelization,
>>>>including run-times, languages, APIs, etc.
>>>>
>>>>I recently had the opportunity to go to lunch with Tarek and we had an excellent
>>>>time and I learned quite a lot about the trends on the software side of the equation.
>>>>One of the points that Tarek emphatically made is that with the emergence of parallel
>>>>processing, the software is becoming equally important as the hardware. Times are
>>>>a changing, and it's not just about your good old compiler getting code into shape
>>>>for the hardware; software is truly an essential part of the glue that binds together
>>>>the system, and I hope to be able to discuss software more in the future at RWT.
>>>>
>>>>Second, Tarek has provided us with an excellent article covering some of the highlights
>>>>of the HotPar 2010 workshop. Hot Par was held in Berkeley this year, and included
>>>>a fair number of papers - but almost all of them were software focused. This is
>>>>a nice change of pace from our usual coverage of ISSCC, Hot Chips or IEDM:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT072610001641
>>>>
>>>>Please join me in thanking Tarek for his contribution, and I look forward to some lively discussions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>David
>>>
>>>I would most certainly agree that more input on this subject is most welcome.
>>>
>>>I have two discussion questions for the section "The Limits of GPUs"
>>>
>>>Firstly, a lot of this content seem to run along the lines of 'untuned Intel xxx
>>>code was a lot slower than the GPU, but then we spent a lot of time rewriting/tuning
>>>the CPu code, and it got faster!' however no mention seems >to be made of similar tuning efforts in GPU code.
>>
>>Well I expect for most of the GPU vs. CPU comparisons made by NV, there was plenty
>>of GPU tuning. I trust their marketing department to do a good job. Ditto for ATI if they were in that game.
>
>We are not looking here at figures of an NVidia tuned implementation versus another
>tuned implementation though are we - they is mention of strong tuning efforts on
>the CPU side, and no mention on the GPU side, that is all I am raising. Please do
>not take it that I believe or support all the NVidia hype.
>
>>>I think most of the people involved in GPU Cuda programming will agree that it
>>>is significantly HARDER to extract full potential from GPU code, although for 'suitable'
>>>codes the gains are even larger - this looks/feels like >one of these cases.... highly
>>>tuned CPU code versus basic GPU code.
>>
>>I'm not really sure how true that is. If you look at some of the presentations
>>out there, it's clear that even on Nehalem - which is one of the most well rounded
>>CPUs out there, you can see a 25X improvement from tuning.
>>
>>That's a pretty big factor.
>>
>>How much variation is there once you've written an algorithm in CUDA?
>
>I have seen factors of well over a hundred in restructurings of the same code to
>more closely match the GPUs needs (often to do with memory access patterns). As
>you say Nehalem is a well rounded CPU, I would not consider any current GPU nearly
>as well rounded - they are highly optimisation sentitive, and the optimisations
>required are more difficult, not less (often due to the lack of tools for suitably detailed profiling, etc)
>
>>NV marketing keeps on saying how CUDA makes programming much easier, yet it sounds
>>like you are saying it really isn't good enough.
>
>Do they? that must be something I keep missing - they like to blow their trumpet
>about good outcomes, and over generalise these, and also talk about peak rates too
>much (as everyone does), but do they really say its easy?
>
>It has certainly become a lot EASIER, due to Cuda and OpenCL, however I dont think
>anyone would call it easy, just look at NVidias own examples.. they are rarely simple,
>even though they often deal with quite trivial codes..
>
>>Also, what about ATI GPUs? I expect a lot more variability there.
>
>So do I, and thats what I find when I test them, however due to the mountain of
>software issues they carry, that is not that often (something that is improving slowly, but very very slowly).
>
>>>It is also interesting (and the full information is not presented) that in the
>>>second group of cases, we seems to be comparing DP codes on Tesla C1060, rather than the most certanly current 2070.
>>>Now, a C1060 has around an 8:1 SP:DP ratio. The 2060 closer to 2:1, and nearly
>>>7 TIMES the peak DP with a single GPU than the 1060... I do not doubt that the Nehalem
>>>system is not the fastest current either, however I doubt a system 7 times faster could be found.
>>>Secondly in this case, the codes being looked at are, as NVidia appears to have
>>>pointed out, not really prime targets of their systems >anyway (any yet their OLD systems do pretty well).
>>>
>>>Now, this could be seen as valid 'limits' of GPUs.
>>>1 - Older implementations (and some current) are not great >at DP.
>>>2 - GPUs are very optimisation sensitive (tools are quite new, and they are not that flexible compute devices)
>>>3 - GPUs performance varies strongly, not all target >applications are suitable.
>>
>>I think the overall moral of the story is that if you see a performance gap of
>>>4-5X between a CPU and GPU, you should look closely at the code (and the hardware
>>too). GPUs are fast on the right problems, but they should not be 10X faster.
>>Especially on bandwidth bound problems where the gap narrows considerably.
>
>Are you missing that fact that the 2060 has 7 TIMES the DP capability of the 1060
>that they used? the moral of that story seems to be selective choice of benchmarks, or is it a historical piece?
>
>GPU can well be 10X faster, or more in some cases, but anyone who tries to over-gernalise
>that is most likely being foolish, drinking the koolaid, or does not understand.
>
>In fact, for certain interesting cases, where their more specialised hardware can
>be used, they can be well over 10X faster, however these cases are quite specific.

I'm not doubting you, I don't know much about the topic and you seem to know something. So can you point to some results please? Results meaning -- instance where _useful_ work is being done and the GPU is 10X faster than a good parallel and SIMD implementation on a Nehalem.

"Interesting" case where it is well over 10X faster would be interesting as well, but more important is the 10X case that is doing useful work.

Thanks in advance!
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Tarek's Hotpar 2010 article onlineDavid Kanter2010/07/27 08:29 AM
  Tarek's Hotpar 2010 article onlineAnon2010/07/27 02:57 PM
    Tarek's Hotpar 2010 article onlineDavid Kanter2010/07/27 11:48 PM
      Tarek's Hotpar 2010 article onlineAnon2010/07/28 03:44 PM
        Tarek's Hotpar 2010 article onlineanon2010/07/28 05:10 PM
        CPU+GPUDavid Kanter2010/07/29 12:38 PM
          CPU+GPUMark Christiansen2010/07/30 07:36 AM
            CPU+GPUhobold2010/07/30 07:54 AM
              CPU+GPUGabriele Svelto2010/07/30 08:18 AM
                CPU+GPUhobold2010/07/30 03:46 PM
              CPU+GPUAaron Spink2010/08/02 06:32 PM
                CPU+GPUhobold2010/08/03 04:33 AM
                  CPU+GPURicardo B2010/08/03 05:19 AM
            CPU+GPU - the software problemVincent Diepeveen2010/07/31 05:50 PM
              CPU+GPU - the software problemmpx2010/08/02 12:19 PM
                CPU+GPU - the software problemRichard Cownie2010/08/02 01:48 PM
                  CPU+GPU - the software problemGabriele Svelto2010/08/03 12:10 AM
                    CPU+GPU - the software problemhobold2010/08/03 04:41 AM
                      CPU+GPU - the software problemRichard Cownie2010/08/03 06:17 AM
                        CPU+GPU - the software problemhobold2010/08/04 07:45 AM
                          NVidia in a holeRichard Cownie2010/08/04 08:23 AM
                            NVidia in a holeRohit2010/08/04 08:33 AM
                              NVidia in a holeRichard Cownie2010/08/04 08:50 AM
                                NVidia in a holeRohit2010/08/05 07:31 AM
                                  NVidia in a holeGroo2010/08/05 02:08 PM
                                NVidia in a holeGroo2010/08/05 02:07 PM
                              NVidia in a holeMark Roulo2010/08/04 09:26 AM
                                NVidia in a holeLaughabee2010/08/18 08:28 AM
                            Can nVidia survive without a sub-$100 GPU market?Mark Roulo2010/08/04 09:29 AM
                              Can nVidia survive without a sub-$100 GPU market?Richard Cownie2010/08/04 09:42 AM
                                Can nVidia survive without a sub-$100 GPU market?Mark Roulo2010/08/04 09:55 AM
                                  Can nVidia survive without a sub-$100 GPU market?Linus Torvalds2010/08/04 11:35 AM
                                    "profit" is subjectiveRichard Cownie2010/08/04 11:49 AM
                                      "profit" is subjectivea reader2010/08/06 04:54 AM
                                        no price warRichard Cownie2010/08/06 07:18 AM
                                  Can nVidia survive without a sub-$100 GPU market?Aaron Spink2010/08/04 12:19 PM
                                  Can nVidia survive without a sub-$100 GPU market?Konrad Schwarz2010/08/06 08:13 AM
                                CPU lineup != GPU lineupRohit2010/08/05 07:43 AM
                                  CPU lineup != GPU lineupRichard Cownie2010/08/05 08:12 AM
                                    CPU lineup != GPU lineupRohit2010/08/05 08:37 AM
                                      CPU lineup != GPU lineupRichard Cownie2010/08/05 08:56 AM
                                        CPU lineup != GPU lineupRohit2010/08/05 11:19 AM
                                          CPU lineup != GPU lineuphobold2010/08/06 04:08 AM
                                            CPU lineup != GPU lineupRohit2010/08/06 07:24 AM
                                              CPU lineup != GPU lineuphobold2010/08/06 07:41 AM
                              Can nVidia survive without a sub-$100 GPU market?David Hess2010/08/04 11:31 AM
                              Can nVidia survive without a sub-$100 GPU market?Ricardo B2010/08/04 01:16 PM
                              Semiconductor economicsDavid Kanter2010/08/05 09:13 AM
                                Semiconductor economicsRichard Cownie2010/08/05 09:51 AM
                                  NV buying ViA could shake up thingsRohit2010/08/05 11:09 AM
                                    NV buying ViA could shake up thingsRichard Cownie2010/08/05 11:25 AM
                                      Not likelyDavid Kanter2010/08/05 02:39 PM
                                        Not likelyrandom2010/08/05 02:49 PM
                                          Not likelyAaron Spink2010/08/05 03:18 PM
                                        Not likelyGroo2010/08/05 10:05 PM
                                        Not likelyRohit2010/08/06 07:25 AM
                                    NV buying ViA could shake up thingsGroo2010/08/05 10:02 PM
                                    NV buying ViA could shake up thingsehud2010/08/06 01:53 AM
                                      NV buying ViA could shake up thingsRohit2010/08/06 07:30 AM
                                        NV buying ViA could shake up thingsKevin G2010/08/06 05:54 PM
                                          ViA buying NV could shake up thingsBrendan2010/08/19 06:23 AM
                                        NV buying ViA could shake up thingsGroo2010/08/06 08:24 PM
                            NVidia in a holempx2010/08/04 12:01 PM
                              NVidia in a holeRichard Cownie2010/08/04 12:31 PM
                                NVidia in a holercf2010/08/04 03:40 PM
                              NVidia in a holeRohit2010/08/05 07:51 AM
                              NVidia in a holeGroo2010/08/05 09:50 PM
                              NVidia in a holeAaron Spink2010/08/05 11:52 PM
                          Anyone else wish Intel would buy Nvidia ? (NT)Silent2010/08/07 01:30 AM
                            Hell noa2010/08/07 08:37 PM
                        CPU+GPU - the software problemno thanks2010/08/04 07:54 PM
                          CPU+GPU - the software problemJouni Osmala2010/08/05 01:41 AM
                            CPU+GPU - the software problemIntelUser20002010/08/05 07:54 PM
                              CPU+GPU - the software problemJouni Osmala2010/08/05 09:36 PM
                            CPU+GPU - the software problemLinus Torvalds2010/08/06 08:08 AM
                              CPU+GPU - the software problemanonymous2010/08/06 09:39 AM
                                CPU+GPU - the software problemLinus Torvalds2010/08/06 10:56 AM
                                  non-existent Via+NV vs real OntarioRichard Cownie2010/08/06 12:12 PM
                              CPU+GPU - the software problemkoby m.2010/08/07 02:06 AM
                  CPU+GPU - the software problemhobold2010/08/03 04:48 AM
                CPU+GPU - the software problemhobold2010/08/03 04:45 AM
                  CPU+GPU - the software problemRichard Cownie2010/08/03 06:22 AM
          CPU+GPUAnon2010/07/30 09:11 PM
            CPU+GPUanon2010/07/31 03:19 AM
            CPU+GPUAaron Spink2010/08/02 06:45 PM
          100x speedups -- here we go againAM2010/08/02 01:37 AM
            100x speedups -- here we go againanon2010/08/02 03:32 AM
              100x speedups -- here we go againanon2010/08/02 11:14 PM
            GPU raw H/W only has about a 10x advantage over a CPUMark Roulo2010/08/02 09:41 AM
              GPU raw H/W only has about a 10x advantage over a CPUMichael S2010/08/02 03:31 PM
                GPU raw H/W only has about a 10x advantage over a CPUanon2010/08/02 09:36 PM
                  GPU raw H/W only has about a 10x advantage over a CPUMichael S2010/08/03 12:41 AM
                    GPU raw H/W only has about a 10x advantage over a CPUMark Roulo2010/08/03 08:22 AM
                      GPU raw H/W only has about a 10x advantage over a CPURohit2010/08/04 07:08 AM
                      There is reasonable explanation...Jouni Osmala2010/08/04 10:10 PM
                  GPU raw H/W only has about a 10x advantage over a CPUMark Roulo2010/08/03 08:19 AM
              simple reality check for youAM2010/08/03 01:45 AM
                simple reality check for younone2010/08/03 07:27 AM
                  simple reality check for youAM2010/08/03 11:50 PM
                    simple reality check for youanon2010/08/04 12:06 AM
                      simple reality check for youAM2010/08/05 03:51 AM
                        catch the same boat as everyone else next time (NT)anon2010/08/05 04:44 AM
                Simple reality checkDavid Kanter2010/08/03 08:24 AM
                  Simple reality checkGabriele Svelto2010/08/03 10:51 PM
                  Simple reality checkAM2010/08/03 11:57 PM
                    Simple reality checkanon2010/08/04 12:12 AM
                      Simple reality checkAM2010/08/05 03:59 AM
                        Simple reality checkanon2010/08/05 04:47 AM
                          Study the papers, troll (NT)AM2010/08/06 12:01 AM
                    Simple reality checkhobold2010/08/04 05:05 AM
                    Simple reality checkDean Kent2010/08/04 09:30 AM
                      Simple reality checkMark Roulo2010/08/04 09:59 AM
                      Suggestion for David Kanter and Mark RouloAM2010/08/05 03:57 AM
                        Suggestion for David Kanter and Mark Roulonone2010/08/05 04:22 AM
                          Suggestion for David Kanter and Mark RouloAM2010/08/06 12:04 AM
                        Suggestion for David Kanter and Mark Roulonone2010/08/05 04:38 AM
                          Suggestion for David Kanter and Mark Rouloanon2010/08/05 04:43 AM
                            Suggestion for David Kanter and Mark RouloAM2010/08/06 12:11 AM
                              Suggestion for David Kanter and Mark Rouloanon2010/08/06 07:52 AM
                          Suggestion for David Kanter and Mark RouloAM2010/08/06 12:10 AM
                            Suggestion for David Kanter and Mark Roulonone2010/08/06 01:35 AM
                              price doesn't matter only in theories (NT)AM2010/08/09 02:13 AM
                            Not apple4appleMichael S2010/08/06 05:13 AM
                              Not apple4appleAM2010/08/09 02:09 AM
                                Not apple4appleMichael S2010/08/09 04:35 AM
                                  Not apple4appleAM2010/08/10 01:05 AM
                                    Not apple4applenone2010/08/10 01:38 AM
                                      Back to topicAM2010/08/11 12:03 AM
                                      Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)AM2010/08/13 04:28 AM
                                        Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)none2010/08/13 09:10 AM
                                          Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)AM2010/08/16 01:14 AM
                                            Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)none2010/08/16 06:29 AM
                                              One example of 1000X shown to be wrong.sea2010/08/16 07:55 PM
                                                You're short of some factsAM2010/08/17 01:13 AM
                                                  Maybe you need to read beyond the PR statementSteve Underwood2010/08/17 02:39 AM
                                                    Maybe you need to read beyond the PR statementGroo2010/08/17 08:18 PM
                                                    check the hw they usedAM2010/08/18 03:33 AM
                                                Please realize what Monte Carlo meansVincent Diepeveen2010/08/18 03:28 AM
                                              Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)AM2010/08/17 01:18 AM
                                        Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)anon2010/08/14 01:22 AM
                                          Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)AM2010/08/16 01:15 AM
                                            Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)anon2010/08/16 02:10 PM
                                              Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)AM2010/08/17 01:15 AM
                                                Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)Michael S2010/08/17 02:58 AM
                                                  Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)AM2010/08/18 03:17 AM
                                                    Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)gallier22010/08/18 04:52 AM
                                                    Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)Michael S2010/08/18 05:33 AM
                                                      Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)Gabriele Svelto2010/08/18 06:11 AM
                                                      Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)Steve Underwood2010/08/18 04:03 PM
                                                        Intel might be moving from ISA to platformhobold2010/08/19 03:58 AM
                                                          Intel might be moving from ISA to platformSteve Underwood2010/08/22 07:00 PM
                                                            Intel might be moving from ISA to platformAnon2010/08/22 10:43 PM
                                                              Intel might be moving from ISA to platformajensen2010/08/23 12:37 AM
                                                                Intel might be moving from ISA to platformMichael S2010/08/23 02:13 AM
                                                                  Intel might be moving from ISA to platformSteve Underwood2010/08/23 02:35 AM
                                                                  Intel might be moving from ISA to platformhobold2010/08/26 04:37 AM
                                                                Intel might be moving from ISA to platformAnon2010/08/23 03:47 PM
                                                              Intel might be moving from ISA to platformSteve Underwood2010/08/23 02:25 AM
                                                                Intel might be moving from ISA to platformhobold2010/08/23 03:03 AM
                                                                  Intel might be moving from ISA to platformSteve Underwood2010/08/23 04:26 AM
                                                                Intel might be moving from ISA to platformAnon2010/08/23 03:55 PM
                                                                Intel might be moving from ISA to platformrwessel2010/08/23 06:41 PM
                                                                  Intel might be moving from ISA to platformSteve Underwood2010/08/23 07:30 PM
                                                                    Intel might be moving from ISA to platformrwessel2010/08/23 09:50 PM
                                                                      Intel might be moving from ISA to platformSteve Underwood2010/08/23 10:34 PM
                                                                        Intel might be moving from ISA to platformrwessel2010/08/24 01:03 AM
                                                              Intel might be moving from ISA to platformIan Ollmann2010/08/23 09:21 PM
                                                          Intel might be moving from ISA to platformajensen2010/08/22 10:36 PM
                                                            Intel might be moving from ISA to platformIan Ollmann2010/08/23 09:45 PM
                                                      Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)AM2010/08/19 01:29 AM
                                                        Final note (and some remarks on Intel's paper)Richard2010/08/19 04:51 AM
                                                          I stand corrected.Michael S2010/08/19 05:30 AM
                simple reality check for youanonymous2010/08/03 10:25 AM
                  simple reality check for youAM2010/08/03 11:47 PM
                    simple reality check for youanonymous2010/08/04 10:17 AM
                      simple reality check for youanon2010/08/04 08:33 PM
                      SPECint/FPAM2010/08/05 03:49 AM
                  simple reality check for youRohit2010/08/13 08:31 PM
                    simple reality check for youhobold2010/08/16 06:29 AM
              maybe texture caches ?Richard Cownie2010/08/03 09:27 AM
                maybe texture caches ?none2010/08/03 09:59 AM
                  maybe texture caches ?Richard Cownie2010/08/03 10:15 AM
                    maybe texture caches ?Mark Roulo2010/08/03 10:23 AM
                      maybe texture caches ?Richard Cownie2010/08/03 10:33 AM
                        maybe texture caches ?Mark Roulo2010/08/03 10:37 AM
                          the Hess paperRichard Cownie2010/08/03 11:16 AM
                    maybe texture caches ?Aaron Spink2010/08/03 01:23 PM
                      maybe texture caches ?Mark Roulo2010/08/03 04:13 PM
                        maybe texture caches ?Michael S2010/08/04 01:47 AM
                  maybe texture caches ?Michael S2010/08/03 10:23 AM
                maybe texture caches ?Mark Roulo2010/08/03 10:19 AM
                  maybe texture caches ?Richard Cownie2010/08/03 10:42 AM
                Cache to cache comparisonDavid Kanter2010/08/03 12:28 PM
                  Cache to cache comparisonRichard Cownie2010/08/03 12:52 PM
                    Cache to cache comparisonDavid Kanter2010/08/03 01:21 PM
                      Cache to cache comparisonRichard Cownie2010/08/03 03:55 PM
                      Cache to cache comparisonGabriele Svelto2010/08/03 11:23 PM
                        Nehalem vs Core2Richard Cownie2010/08/04 04:24 PM
                          Nehalem vs Core2IntelUser20002010/08/04 07:26 PM
                          Nehalem vs Core2Gabriele Svelto2010/08/04 10:51 PM
                            Nehalem vs Core2Richard Cownie2010/08/05 03:27 AM
                              Nehalem vs Core2Gabriele Svelto2010/08/05 06:00 AM
                                Nehalem vs Core2Richard Cownie2010/08/05 07:10 AM
                                  Nehalem vs Core2Gabriele Svelto2010/08/05 07:41 AM
                                    Nehalem vs Core2Michael S2010/08/05 10:02 AM
                              Nehalem vs Core2Michael S2010/08/05 10:12 AM
                          Nehalem vs Core2Michael S2010/08/05 12:36 AM
                            Nehalem vs Core2Richard Cownie2010/08/05 08:33 AM
                              Nehalem vs Core2Michael S2010/08/05 09:44 AM
                                Nehalem vs Core2Richard Cownie2010/08/05 10:03 AM
                                  Nehalem vs Core2Michael S2010/08/05 04:21 PM
                                    Nehalem vs Core2Richard Cownie2010/08/05 07:15 PM
                                      I'm wrong, you're right - i's 2 dieRichard Cownie2010/08/05 07:21 PM
                                    Nehalem vs Core2Richard Cownie2010/08/06 08:12 AM
                                      Nehalem vs Core2Michael S2010/08/06 08:33 AM
                                      Nehalem L1 cache latency a hedge for higher clock speeds?Mark Roulo2010/08/06 08:36 AM
                                        Nehalem L1 cache latency a hedge for higher clock speeds?Kevin G2010/08/07 10:14 AM
                                          Nehalem L1 cache latency a hedge for higher clock speeds?IntelUser20002010/08/07 02:32 PM
                                        Nehalem L1 cache latency a hedge for higher clock speeds?someone2010/08/07 02:35 PM
                          difference between C2D/C2Q chipsetsMichael S2010/08/05 12:57 AM
                          Nehalem core goals ... my takeMark Roulo2010/08/06 07:53 AM
                            Bulldozer single-threadRichard Cownie2010/08/06 04:05 PM
                          Nehalem vs Core2Carlie Coats2010/08/07 08:41 AM
                            scalingMichael S2010/08/07 11:12 AM
                            why X5460?Michael S2010/08/07 11:12 AM
                              why X5460?Carlie Coats2010/08/08 04:34 AM
                                why X5460?Michael S2010/08/08 04:42 AM
                                  Polling/PIO based COMM libraries?Michael S2010/08/08 05:14 AM
                    Cache to cache comparisonAnts Aasma2010/08/04 10:00 AM
                      Cache to cache comparisonRichard Cownie2010/08/04 10:08 AM
                        Cache to cache comparisonAnts Aasma2010/08/04 11:28 AM
                      Cache to cache comparisonMichael S2010/08/04 11:33 AM
                        Cache to cache comparisonMark Roulo2010/08/04 12:29 PM
                          Cache to cache comparisonAnts Aasma2010/08/04 01:10 PM
                            Fermi and G200 instruction latencyMark Roulo2010/08/04 02:10 PM
                              Fermi and G200 instruction latencyAnts Aasma2010/08/04 03:01 PM
                        Cache to cache comparisonAnts Aasma2010/08/04 01:00 PM
                        Register read comparisonDavid Kanter2010/08/05 09:16 AM
                          Register read comparisonGabriele Svelto2010/08/05 11:42 PM
                maybe texture caches ?Aaron Spink2010/08/03 01:17 PM
              GPU raw H/W only has about a 10x advantage over a CPURichard2010/08/09 04:58 AM
                GPU raw H/W only has about a 10x advantage over a CPUnone2010/08/09 05:19 AM
                  GPU raw H/W only has about a 10x advantage over a CPUVincent Diepeveen2010/08/24 07:18 AM
                    Forget it, they won't hear itanon2010/08/24 04:37 PM
                    GPU raw H/W only has about a 10x advantage over a CPURichard2010/08/25 01:03 PM
                This forum supports pre tagMichael S2010/08/09 06:03 AM
    Tarek's Hotpar 2010 article onlineRich Vuduc2010/07/28 10:24 AM
      Tarek's Hotpar 2010 article onlineAnon2010/07/28 04:18 PM
  Low hanging fruitMoritz2011/02/03 12:20 PM
    Low hanging fruitJukka Larja2011/02/06 05:01 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell green?