Article: Parallelism at HotPar 2010
By: Mark Roulo (nothanks.delete@this.xxx.com), August 4, 2010 9:26 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Rohit (@.) on 8/4/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>Richard Cownie (tich@pobox.com) on 8/4/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>
>>On the technical side, they've had a couple of years of
>>unreliable and too-hot chips (leading to the loss of
>>major OEMs such as Apple). And they don't appear to have
>>any option in the near future to achieve tighter integration
>>with a capable scalar cpu, which is what both AMD and Intel
>>are doing.
>
>All current macbooks ship with nv gpu's
If I remember correctly, up until the recent (last week or so) iMac announcement, the *entire* Mac lineup was nVidia. Which I thought was a strategic move by Apple to jumpstart OpenCL on GPUs (don't ask me if I think this is the right strategy or not, it was just what I though Apple was doing).
The new iMacs all ship with ATI GPUs, so clearly nVidia has lost at least a bit of the Mac market compared to last year.
-Mark Roulo
---------------------------
>Richard Cownie (tich@pobox.com) on 8/4/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>
>>On the technical side, they've had a couple of years of
>>unreliable and too-hot chips (leading to the loss of
>>major OEMs such as Apple). And they don't appear to have
>>any option in the near future to achieve tighter integration
>>with a capable scalar cpu, which is what both AMD and Intel
>>are doing.
>
>All current macbooks ship with nv gpu's
If I remember correctly, up until the recent (last week or so) iMac announcement, the *entire* Mac lineup was nVidia. Which I thought was a strategic move by Apple to jumpstart OpenCL on GPUs (don't ask me if I think this is the right strategy or not, it was just what I though Apple was doing).
The new iMacs all ship with ATI GPUs, so clearly nVidia has lost at least a bit of the Mac market compared to last year.
-Mark Roulo