Article: Parallelism at HotPar 2010
By: anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com), August 5, 2010 4:43 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
none (none@none.com) on 8/5/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>I picked the one which claims x300 speedup.
>
>http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-17-22-20178
>
>"In comparison,we compiled the CPU implementation, tMCimg,
>using the “-O3” option with the gcc compiler and double-
>precision computation on a single core of an Intel 64bit Xeon
>processor of 1.86GHz."
>
>So single core, low frequency, double precision, out-of-the
>box compilation. Enough said.
Yeah, sorry, you're full of shit AM. If you don't know what you're talking about you shouldn't be so vocal.
---------------------------
>I picked the one which claims x300 speedup.
>
>http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-17-22-20178
>
>"In comparison,we compiled the CPU implementation, tMCimg,
>using the “-O3” option with the gcc compiler and double-
>precision computation on a single core of an Intel 64bit Xeon
>processor of 1.86GHz."
>
>So single core, low frequency, double precision, out-of-the
>box compilation. Enough said.
Yeah, sorry, you're full of shit AM. If you don't know what you're talking about you shouldn't be so vocal.
