Article: Parallelism at HotPar 2010
By: AM (myname4rwt.delete@this.jee-male.com), August 6, 2010 12:11 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
anon (anon@anon.com) on 8/5/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>none (none@none.com) on 8/5/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>I picked the one which claims x300 speedup.
>>
>>http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-17-22-20178
>>
>>"In comparison,we compiled the CPU implementation, tMCimg,
>>using the “-O3” option with the gcc compiler and double-
>>precision computation on a single core of an Intel 64bit Xeon
>>processor of 1.86GHz."
>>
>>So single core, low frequency, double precision, out-of-the
>>box compilation. Enough said.
>
>Yeah, sorry, you're full of shit AM. If you don't know what you're talking about you shouldn't be so vocal.
LOL Check the prices of the GPU and the CPU the speedup refers to (in the other post), little troll.
---------------------------
>none (none@none.com) on 8/5/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>I picked the one which claims x300 speedup.
>>
>>http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-17-22-20178
>>
>>"In comparison,we compiled the CPU implementation, tMCimg,
>>using the “-O3” option with the gcc compiler and double-
>>precision computation on a single core of an Intel 64bit Xeon
>>processor of 1.86GHz."
>>
>>So single core, low frequency, double precision, out-of-the
>>box compilation. Enough said.
>
>Yeah, sorry, you're full of shit AM. If you don't know what you're talking about you shouldn't be so vocal.
LOL Check the prices of the GPU and the CPU the speedup refers to (in the other post), little troll.