Article: Parallelism at HotPar 2010
By: AM (myname4rwt.delete@this.jee-male.com), August 6, 2010 12:10 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
none (none@none.com) on 8/5/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>I picked the one which claims x300 speedup.
>
>http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-17-22-20178
>
>"In comparison,we compiled the CPU implementation, tMCimg,
>using the “-O3” option with the gcc compiler and double-
>precision computation on a single core of an Intel 64bit Xeon
>processor of 1.86GHz."
>
>So single core, low frequency, double precision, out-of-the
>box compilation. Enough said.
They got these results using a card available (new) for $80+ these days http://www.google.com/products?q=9800+GT&scoring=p (8800GT no longer avail, 9800GT uses the same G92 chip).
Apparently, $80 won't buy you even the cheapest new Core 2 Duo, let alone a 1.86 GHz Xeon, which can cost as little as $188 (E5502) or as much as $3157 (L7555) http://www.intc.com/priceList.cfm
---------------------------
>I picked the one which claims x300 speedup.
>
>http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-17-22-20178
>
>"In comparison,we compiled the CPU implementation, tMCimg,
>using the “-O3” option with the gcc compiler and double-
>precision computation on a single core of an Intel 64bit Xeon
>processor of 1.86GHz."
>
>So single core, low frequency, double precision, out-of-the
>box compilation. Enough said.
They got these results using a card available (new) for $80+ these days http://www.google.com/products?q=9800+GT&scoring=p (8800GT no longer avail, 9800GT uses the same G92 chip).
Apparently, $80 won't buy you even the cheapest new Core 2 Duo, let alone a 1.86 GHz Xeon, which can cost as little as $188 (E5502) or as much as $3157 (L7555) http://www.intc.com/priceList.cfm