By: lurker (lurking.delete@this.work.com), September 21, 2010 7:11 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
anon (anon@anon.com) on 9/21/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>
>I think the more general rule is that Sun only releases benchmark numbers when
>it makes them look good. I doubt this practice will have changed.
That can't be true, there would have been no releases in the last 10 years. [insert rimshot] Is this thing on?
---------------------------
>
>I think the more general rule is that Sun only releases benchmark numbers when
>it makes them look good. I doubt this practice will have changed.
That can't be true, there would have been no releases in the last 10 years. [insert rimshot] Is this thing on?
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
T3 announced | Max | 2010/09/21 04:42 AM |
T3 announced | someone | 2010/09/21 05:53 AM |
T3 announced | anon | 2010/09/21 06:05 AM |
T3 announced | lurker | 2010/09/21 07:11 AM |
T3 announced | Jesper Frimann | 2010/09/21 07:21 AM |
T3 announced | Phil | 2010/09/22 12:59 AM |
T3 announced | Michael S | 2010/09/22 06:16 AM |
T3 announced | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/21 07:15 AM |
T3 announced | anon | 2010/09/21 09:31 AM |
Transactional memory | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/21 10:52 AM |
Transactional memory | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/21 12:21 PM |
Transactional memory | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/23 07:30 AM |
Transactional memory | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/23 08:01 AM |
Transactional memory | David Kanter | 2010/09/24 12:05 AM |
Transactional memory | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/24 07:59 AM |
Transactional memory | David Kanter | 2010/09/25 09:27 AM |
'dynamic fallback'? | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/25 11:28 AM |
'dynamic fallback'? | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/25 01:23 PM |
'dynamic fallback'? | blaine | 2010/09/25 02:16 PM |
Cliff Click Jr. on Azul's HTM | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/24 02:19 PM |
Transactional memory | Foo_ | 2010/09/24 03:08 AM |
T3 announced | blaine | 2010/09/21 11:43 AM |
no news from Fujitsu | Max | 2010/09/21 10:37 PM |