By: Phil (phil.delete@this.phil.com), September 22, 2010 12:59 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
anon (anon@anon.com) on 9/21/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>someone (someone@somewhere.com) on 9/21/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Max (nousefor@name.com) on 9/21/10 wrote:
>>---------------------------
>>>http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/173536
>>>
>>>some benchmarks:
>>>
>>>http://blogs.sun.com/BestPerf/entry/sparc_t3_4_sets_world
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>gone is the 2x per core performance claim. we still will be getting 4 t3-2 boxen here.
>>
>>Sun used to release SPECint_rate numbers for its T chips.
>>I hope Oracle hasn't stopped this practice.
>
>I think the more general rule is that Sun only releases benchmark numbers when
>it makes them look good. I doubt this practice will have changed.
And do you think IBM or Intel would release benchmarks that *don't* make them look good?
---------------------------
>someone (someone@somewhere.com) on 9/21/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Max (nousefor@name.com) on 9/21/10 wrote:
>>---------------------------
>>>http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/173536
>>>
>>>some benchmarks:
>>>
>>>http://blogs.sun.com/BestPerf/entry/sparc_t3_4_sets_world
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>gone is the 2x per core performance claim. we still will be getting 4 t3-2 boxen here.
>>
>>Sun used to release SPECint_rate numbers for its T chips.
>>I hope Oracle hasn't stopped this practice.
>
>I think the more general rule is that Sun only releases benchmark numbers when
>it makes them look good. I doubt this practice will have changed.
And do you think IBM or Intel would release benchmarks that *don't* make them look good?
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
T3 announced | Max | 2010/09/21 04:42 AM |
T3 announced | someone | 2010/09/21 05:53 AM |
T3 announced | anon | 2010/09/21 06:05 AM |
T3 announced | lurker | 2010/09/21 07:11 AM |
T3 announced | Jesper Frimann | 2010/09/21 07:21 AM |
T3 announced | Phil | 2010/09/22 12:59 AM |
T3 announced | Michael S | 2010/09/22 06:16 AM |
T3 announced | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/21 07:15 AM |
T3 announced | anon | 2010/09/21 09:31 AM |
Transactional memory | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/21 10:52 AM |
Transactional memory | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/21 12:21 PM |
Transactional memory | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/23 07:30 AM |
Transactional memory | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/23 08:01 AM |
Transactional memory | David Kanter | 2010/09/24 12:05 AM |
Transactional memory | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/24 07:59 AM |
Transactional memory | David Kanter | 2010/09/25 09:27 AM |
'dynamic fallback'? | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/25 11:28 AM |
'dynamic fallback'? | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/25 01:23 PM |
'dynamic fallback'? | blaine | 2010/09/25 02:16 PM |
Cliff Click Jr. on Azul's HTM | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/24 02:19 PM |
Transactional memory | Foo_ | 2010/09/24 03:08 AM |
T3 announced | blaine | 2010/09/21 11:43 AM |
no news from Fujitsu | Max | 2010/09/21 10:37 PM |