By: Linus Torvalds (torvalds.delete@this.linux-foundation.org), September 21, 2010 6:15 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Max (nousefor@name.com) on 9/21/10 wrote:
>
>gone is the 2x per core performance claim. we still will
>be getting 4 t3-2 boxen here.
Is there any real technical information? I'm not seeing
Oracle crowing about transactional memory etc, so it looks
like it's very similar to T2 with double the cores (now
16 cores per chip).
Linus
>
>gone is the 2x per core performance claim. we still will
>be getting 4 t3-2 boxen here.
Is there any real technical information? I'm not seeing
Oracle crowing about transactional memory etc, so it looks
like it's very similar to T2 with double the cores (now
16 cores per chip).
Linus
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
T3 announced | Max | 2010/09/21 03:42 AM |
T3 announced | someone | 2010/09/21 04:53 AM |
T3 announced | anon | 2010/09/21 05:05 AM |
T3 announced | lurker | 2010/09/21 06:11 AM |
T3 announced | Jesper Frimann | 2010/09/21 06:21 AM |
T3 announced | Phil | 2010/09/21 11:59 PM |
T3 announced | Michael S | 2010/09/22 05:16 AM |
T3 announced | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/21 06:15 AM |
T3 announced | anon | 2010/09/21 08:31 AM |
Transactional memory | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/21 09:52 AM |
Transactional memory | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/21 11:21 AM |
Transactional memory | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/23 06:30 AM |
Transactional memory | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/23 07:01 AM |
Transactional memory | David Kanter | 2010/09/23 11:05 PM |
Transactional memory | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/24 06:59 AM |
Transactional memory | David Kanter | 2010/09/25 08:27 AM |
'dynamic fallback'? | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/25 10:28 AM |
'dynamic fallback'? | Linus Torvalds | 2010/09/25 12:23 PM |
'dynamic fallback'? | blaine | 2010/09/25 01:16 PM |
Cliff Click Jr. on Azul's HTM | Paul A. Clayton | 2010/09/24 01:19 PM |
Transactional memory | Foo_ | 2010/09/24 02:08 AM |
T3 announced | blaine | 2010/09/21 10:43 AM |
no news from Fujitsu | Max | 2010/09/21 09:37 PM |