By: someone (someone.delete@this.somewhere.com), November 17, 2010 11:42 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Richard Cownie (tich@pobox.com) on 11/17/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>someone (someone@somewhere.com) on 11/17/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>
>>The McKinley core was a perfectly sane design for its
>>era - large die 180 nm single core FSB based MPU.
>
>Am I hallucinating, or wasn't the first IPF core called
>Merced ? Has that one been airbrushed out of history ?
Huh?
Merced and McKinley were independent efforts by two
different design teams. The problems of one doesn't
diminish the qualities of the other.
Unless your point is simply to throw mud...
---------------------------
>someone (someone@somewhere.com) on 11/17/10 wrote:
>---------------------------
>
>>The McKinley core was a perfectly sane design for its
>>era - large die 180 nm single core FSB based MPU.
>
>Am I hallucinating, or wasn't the first IPF core called
>Merced ? Has that one been airbrushed out of history ?
Huh?
Merced and McKinley were independent efforts by two
different design teams. The problems of one doesn't
diminish the qualities of the other.
Unless your point is simply to throw mud...