By: someone (someone.delete@this.somewhere.com), November 17, 2010 11:40 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 11/17/10 wrote:
---------------------------
>Of course, Intel might also leave that up to the software...which
>would be stupid, but also more philosophically consistent with EPIC.
>
>David
Hmmmm.
Montecito didn't leave management of its extremely coarse
grained multi-threading up to software so why would Intel
attempt that with Poulson's very likely much finer grained
multi-threading?
---------------------------
>Of course, Intel might also leave that up to the software...which
>would be stupid, but also more philosophically consistent with EPIC.
>
>David
Hmmmm.
Montecito didn't leave management of its extremely coarse
grained multi-threading up to software so why would Intel
attempt that with Poulson's very likely much finer grained
multi-threading?
