By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), January 18, 2011 11:05 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
someone (someone@somewhere.com) on 1/14/11 wrote:
---------------------------
>none (none@none.com) on 1/14/11 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>? (0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com) on 1/14/11 wrote:
>>---------------------------
>>[...]
>>>One course of action for Intel to get x86 into the tablets and phones would be:
>>>continue improving the manufacturing technology, design an architecture that can
>>>be "easily" scaled from 32 cores down to 2 cores, and completely scrap the current Atom architecture.
>>>
>>>If a CPU with 32 cores has a power consumption of 100W, then the 2-core variant
>>>will have power consumption 100W/20=5W or something. By using a lower CPU clock
>>>and power-optimized manufacturing process, Intel will possibly bring it down to
>>>1W. And that might possibly include a DX11 capable GPU with hardware video decoding.
>>
>>Intel process has been tuned for performance. They would
>>have to develop some new process to improve power.
>
>You mean like its SoC processes with low leakage transistors?
>
>> The
>>question is: can they invest that much money in order to
>>target a market where the price of a CPU is a very important
>>factor and would require them to lower their margins?
>
>Intel has developed 45 and 32 nm SoC processes and
>has said it will deliver a 22 nm SoC process at the same
>time as its high perfomance 22 nm process. Despite the
>extra investment in these SoC processes with admittedly
>next to no sales revenue to date Intel has just posted Q4
>results with record revenue, profits, and margins.
I think Intel is planning on revenues both from classic embedded, as well as stuff like tablets, cellphones, etc. The classic embedded can be quite lucrative.
>It is unlikely Intel will have to lower its percentage >gross
>margin to compete with ARM. The problem would be
>smaller absolute gross margin ($) per chip if two figure
>chips started replacing sales of three figure Intel chips
>in large quantities. But if that is going to happen it will
>happen whether Intel wants it to or not. All it can do is
>make sure that it is Intel two figure chips that are doing
>the replacing.
I'd disagree here. First, Intel is competing with ARM and ARM customers. Many of these customers have dramatically different cost profiles and optimizations. They are also probably 'leaner' operations (i.e. less marketing, etc.).
Intel needs to be in the ballpark on cost, which I think will lower their GMs relative to the average for x86. However, they are probably quite willing to do that in order to grow revenue and increase their volumes. Alternatively, they may pursue arrangements that enable them to expand revenue while still retaining higher GMs.
For instance, Intel has their partnership with Micron for flash. That structural arrangement probably mitigates the somewhat lower margins of flash and SSDs, while giving Intel upside.
David
---------------------------
>none (none@none.com) on 1/14/11 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>? (0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com) on 1/14/11 wrote:
>>---------------------------
>>[...]
>>>One course of action for Intel to get x86 into the tablets and phones would be:
>>>continue improving the manufacturing technology, design an architecture that can
>>>be "easily" scaled from 32 cores down to 2 cores, and completely scrap the current Atom architecture.
>>>
>>>If a CPU with 32 cores has a power consumption of 100W, then the 2-core variant
>>>will have power consumption 100W/20=5W or something. By using a lower CPU clock
>>>and power-optimized manufacturing process, Intel will possibly bring it down to
>>>1W. And that might possibly include a DX11 capable GPU with hardware video decoding.
>>
>>Intel process has been tuned for performance. They would
>>have to develop some new process to improve power.
>
>You mean like its SoC processes with low leakage transistors?
>
>> The
>>question is: can they invest that much money in order to
>>target a market where the price of a CPU is a very important
>>factor and would require them to lower their margins?
>
>Intel has developed 45 and 32 nm SoC processes and
>has said it will deliver a 22 nm SoC process at the same
>time as its high perfomance 22 nm process. Despite the
>extra investment in these SoC processes with admittedly
>next to no sales revenue to date Intel has just posted Q4
>results with record revenue, profits, and margins.
I think Intel is planning on revenues both from classic embedded, as well as stuff like tablets, cellphones, etc. The classic embedded can be quite lucrative.
>It is unlikely Intel will have to lower its percentage >gross
>margin to compete with ARM. The problem would be
>smaller absolute gross margin ($) per chip if two figure
>chips started replacing sales of three figure Intel chips
>in large quantities. But if that is going to happen it will
>happen whether Intel wants it to or not. All it can do is
>make sure that it is Intel two figure chips that are doing
>the replacing.
I'd disagree here. First, Intel is competing with ARM and ARM customers. Many of these customers have dramatically different cost profiles and optimizations. They are also probably 'leaner' operations (i.e. less marketing, etc.).
Intel needs to be in the ballpark on cost, which I think will lower their GMs relative to the average for x86. However, they are probably quite willing to do that in order to grow revenue and increase their volumes. Alternatively, they may pursue arrangements that enable them to expand revenue while still retaining higher GMs.
For instance, Intel has their partnership with Micron for flash. That structural arrangement probably mitigates the somewhat lower margins of flash and SSDs, while giving Intel upside.
David
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Will Smith | 2011/01/12 01:30 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Max | 2011/01/12 02:50 AM |
Any x86 -> ARM port experience? | Ben Harper | 2011/01/12 04:22 AM |
Any x86 -> ARM port experience? | Michael S | 2011/01/12 07:52 AM |
Any x86 -> ARM port experience? | Megol | 2011/01/12 10:10 AM |
Any x86 -> ARM port experience? | Michael S | 2011/01/12 11:19 AM |
Any x86 -> ARM port experience? | Wilco | 2011/01/12 12:47 PM |
badly written? | Michael S | 2011/01/12 01:59 PM |
badly written? | Wilco | 2011/01/12 03:03 PM |
badly written? | Megol | 2011/01/13 05:16 AM |
badly written? | Wilco | 2011/01/13 07:09 AM |
badly written? | Megol | 2011/01/14 03:28 AM |
badly written? | Wilco | 2011/01/14 07:20 AM |
badly written? | mpx | 2011/01/13 09:19 AM |
badly written? | James | 2011/01/14 04:15 AM |
unaligned read is fast on Nehalem | Richard Cownie | 2011/01/13 10:10 AM |
unaligned read is fast on Nehalem | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/13 10:45 AM |
l1 access size? | anon | 2011/01/13 12:16 PM |
unaligned read is fast on Nehalem | Richard Cownie | 2011/01/13 12:21 PM |
unaligned read is fast on Nehalem | EduardoS | 2011/01/13 04:42 PM |
unaligned read is fast on Nehalem | Michael S | 2011/01/13 04:50 PM |
unaligned read is fast on Nehalem | Richard Cownie | 2011/01/13 05:50 PM |
unaligned read is fast on Nehalem | Konrad Schwarz | 2011/01/17 07:28 AM |
badly written? | anoneeeemouse | 2011/01/12 06:31 PM |
And endianness? | Ben Harper | 2011/01/13 05:34 AM |
And endianness? | rwessel | 2011/01/13 05:40 AM |
And endianness? | Wilco | 2011/01/13 06:20 AM |
And endianness? | Ben Harper | 2011/01/13 08:11 AM |
And endianness? | Konrad Schwarz | 2011/01/17 07:20 AM |
And endianness? | Megol | 2011/01/17 11:09 AM |
Any x86 -> ARM port experience? | EduardoS | 2011/01/12 02:30 PM |
Any x86 -> ARM port experience? | anon | 2011/01/12 10:53 AM |
Any x86 -> ARM port experience? | anon | 2011/01/12 10:28 PM |
Any x86 -> ARM port experience? | anon | 2011/01/12 10:52 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/12 11:44 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Wilco | 2011/01/12 03:53 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | anon | 2011/01/12 04:14 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Wilco | 2011/01/12 04:20 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | anon | 2011/01/12 04:36 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Wilco | 2011/01/12 05:17 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/12 05:46 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Wilco | 2011/01/12 05:54 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | anon | 2011/01/12 05:49 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Wilco | 2011/01/12 06:20 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | anon | 2011/01/12 07:20 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Wilco | 2011/01/12 08:51 PM |
Some CoreMark results | Paul A. Clayton | 2011/01/12 07:41 PM |
Some CoreMark results | Wilco | 2011/01/12 10:49 PM |
Some CoreMark results | Paul A. Clayton | 2011/01/13 09:14 AM |
Some CoreMark results | Wilco | 2011/01/13 12:31 PM |
Some CoreMark results | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/13 12:36 PM |
Some CoreMark results | anonymous | 2011/01/13 01:05 PM |
Some CoreMark results | Wilco | 2011/01/13 01:15 PM |
Some CoreMark results | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/13 03:02 PM |
Some CoreMark results | Wilco | 2011/01/14 08:24 AM |
Some CoreMark results | none | 2011/01/14 08:55 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/12 04:21 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Wilco | 2011/01/12 05:07 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/12 06:07 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Michael S | 2011/01/13 04:33 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/13 09:19 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Megol | 2011/01/14 04:51 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | anon | 2011/01/12 05:09 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/12 06:09 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | anonymous | 2011/01/13 06:50 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Michael S | 2011/01/13 07:52 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/13 10:28 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | ? | 2011/01/14 08:48 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | none | 2011/01/14 09:01 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | someone | 2011/01/14 11:03 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | none | 2011/01/14 03:38 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | someone | 2011/01/15 10:53 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | mpx | 2011/01/15 01:18 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/15 06:03 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Brett | 2011/01/15 12:01 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | mpx | 2011/01/15 01:40 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/17 04:11 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Rob Thorpe | 2011/01/17 04:35 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Michael S | 2011/01/17 05:23 PM |
As you can see... | Rob Thorpe | 2011/01/17 06:52 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/17 05:57 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Greg Gritton | 2011/01/17 11:57 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Brett | 2011/01/18 11:00 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Megol | 2011/01/18 11:11 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Max | 2011/01/18 01:34 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Brett | 2011/01/18 10:39 AM |
Apple | David Kanter | 2011/01/18 11:22 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Max | 2011/01/18 12:17 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Rob Thorpe | 2011/01/18 03:36 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Brett | 2011/01/18 06:00 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | David Kanter | 2011/01/18 07:44 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | rwessel | 2011/01/18 09:19 PM |
Definition of SOC | Rob Thorpe | 2011/01/19 02:24 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/18 11:26 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Brett | 2011/01/19 01:57 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/19 02:15 AM |
Pioneers get arrows in their backs | Brett | 2011/01/19 07:08 PM |
Pioneers get arrows in their backs | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/19 08:22 PM |
Plausible ID, HCI translation | Paul A. Clayton | 2011/01/19 09:18 AM |
Quad pixel? | David Kanter | 2011/01/19 02:37 PM |
Quad pixel? | Brett | 2011/01/19 03:53 PM |
Quad pixel? | David Kanter | 2011/01/19 08:10 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/19 05:22 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/19 08:15 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/19 09:11 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/19 09:12 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | iz | 2011/01/19 10:03 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/19 10:52 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/19 11:35 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/19 11:43 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 12:23 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/20 01:00 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | mpx | 2011/01/20 02:34 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/20 04:29 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/20 09:34 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Ricardo B | 2011/01/20 11:25 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/20 11:51 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 01:28 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/20 02:00 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 03:52 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/20 04:30 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Ricardo B | 2011/01/20 01:36 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/20 04:57 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Ricardo B | 2011/01/20 06:14 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | MS | 2011/01/21 09:06 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 01:19 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | mpx | 2011/01/21 05:45 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | James | 2011/01/21 07:37 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | mpx | 2011/01/21 03:10 PM |
databases and filesystems | Foo_ | 2011/01/21 06:26 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | iz | 2011/01/20 12:45 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/20 09:54 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | iz | 2011/01/20 11:28 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/19 10:34 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Doug Siebert | 2011/01/19 11:48 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/19 11:59 PM |
TRIM - How about we use LBA and PBA? | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 12:06 AM |
TRIM - How about we use LBA and PBA? | anon | 2011/01/20 12:10 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 05:23 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Anon | 2011/01/19 10:58 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/19 11:04 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/19 11:34 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/19 11:59 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/20 12:18 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 12:54 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/20 01:12 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 01:44 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/20 08:56 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/20 08:59 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 01:33 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/20 04:55 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 05:14 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/20 06:14 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 08:38 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/20 09:16 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | mpx | 2011/01/20 03:58 PM |
Supercaps | slacker | 2011/01/20 04:57 PM |
Supercaps | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 05:20 PM |
Supercaps | slacker | 2011/01/20 05:43 PM |
Supercaps | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 08:25 PM |
Supercaps | slacker | 2011/01/20 11:02 PM |
Supercaps | MS | 2011/01/21 01:37 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/20 09:58 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | ajensen | 2011/01/21 03:23 AM |
Mythical SSDs | Ricardo B | 2011/01/21 06:27 AM |
Mythical SSDs | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/21 10:24 AM |
Mythical SSDs | anon | 2011/01/21 12:00 PM |
What is off-line? | David Kanter | 2011/01/21 12:09 PM |
What is off-line? | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/21 01:51 PM |
What is off-line? | Octoploid | 2011/01/21 02:04 PM |
Mythical SSDs | ajensen | 2011/01/21 12:28 PM |
Mythical SSDs | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/21 12:58 PM |
Mythical SSDs | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/21 01:21 PM |
Mythical SSDs | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/21 04:13 PM |
Mythical SSDs | anon | 2011/01/21 07:47 PM |
Mythical SSDs | mpx | 2011/01/22 01:01 AM |
Mythical SSDs | anon | 2011/01/22 02:08 AM |
Mythical Linus | ? | 2011/01/25 07:16 AM |
Mythical Linus | Ungo | 2011/01/25 12:35 PM |
Mythical Linus | Dean Kent | 2011/01/25 01:14 PM |
Filesystem impact | David Kanter | 2011/01/25 01:16 PM |
Filesystem impact | Ungo | 2011/01/25 03:15 PM |
Filesystem impact | iz | 2011/01/25 05:18 PM |
Filesystem impact | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/26 01:25 PM |
Filesystem impact | Foo_ | 2011/01/25 05:14 PM |
Filesystem impact | iz | 2011/01/25 05:24 PM |
Filesystem impact | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/26 01:27 PM |
Filesystem impact | Robert Myers | 2011/01/26 06:43 PM |
Filesystem impact | anon | 2011/01/26 08:29 PM |
Filesystem impact | anon | 2011/01/26 07:19 PM |
Filesystem impact | Groo | 2011/01/25 07:42 PM |
Filesystem impact | iz | 2011/01/25 10:03 PM |
Filesystem impact | mpx | 2011/01/26 02:15 AM |
Filesystem impact | iz | 2011/01/26 03:14 AM |
Windows 7 and SSDs: Setup secrets and tune-up tweaks | _Arthur | 2011/01/26 06:59 PM |
TRIM | iz | 2011/01/19 09:54 PM |
TRIM | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/19 11:43 PM |
TRIM | iz | 2011/01/20 01:01 AM |
TRIM | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 01:25 AM |
TRIM | iz | 2011/01/20 04:29 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Megol | 2011/01/20 03:29 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/20 10:05 AM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | Rob Thorpe | 2011/01/22 01:30 PM |
TRIM (was Quad pixel?) | anon | 2011/01/22 07:07 PM |
TRIM | David Kanter | 2011/01/24 02:05 PM |
TRIM | anon | 2011/01/24 02:57 PM |
TRIM | MS | 2011/01/24 03:22 PM |
TRIM | Dan Downs | 2011/01/24 06:44 PM |
TRIM | Dan Downs | 2011/01/24 06:51 PM |
TRIM | anon | 2011/01/24 07:29 PM |
TRIM | MS | 2011/01/24 08:40 PM |
TRIM | Ricardo B | 2011/01/25 03:40 PM |
TRIM | Anon | 2011/01/24 06:37 PM |
TRIM | Richard Cownie | 2011/01/24 07:45 PM |
TRIM | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/24 07:53 PM |
TRIM | Anon | 2011/01/24 09:28 PM |
TRIM | Richard Cownie | 2011/01/25 07:39 AM |
TRIM Linus is right | gallier2 | 2011/01/25 11:18 AM |
TRIM Linus is right | Max | 2011/01/25 12:30 PM |
TRIM Linus is right | Michael S | 2011/01/25 01:17 PM |
TRIM Linus is right | Max | 2011/01/25 06:15 PM |
TRIM Linus is right | Anon | 2011/01/25 09:09 PM |
TRIM Linus is right | gallier2 | 2011/01/26 02:26 AM |
TRIM Linus is right | anon | 2011/01/26 09:30 PM |
TRIM Linus is right | Ricardo B | 2011/01/26 02:12 AM |
TRIM Linus is right | iz | 2011/01/26 03:19 AM |
Linus is wrong - TRIM is *essential* | ? | 2011/01/26 05:04 AM |
Linus is wrong - TRIM is *essential* | Meeple | 2011/01/26 04:34 PM |
Linus is wrong - TRIM is *essential* | iz | 2011/01/26 08:01 PM |
Linus is wrong - TRIM is *essential* | anon | 2011/01/26 08:40 PM |
Linus is wrong - TRIM is *essential* | David Kanter | 2011/01/26 09:09 PM |
Linus is wrong - TRIM is *essential* | anon | 2011/01/26 09:40 PM |
TRIM Linus is right | MS | 2011/01/26 12:03 PM |
TRIM Linus is right | Michael S | 2011/01/26 12:48 PM |
TRIM Linus is right | MS | 2011/01/26 01:30 PM |
Relative latency | David Kanter | 2011/01/26 01:09 PM |
Relative latency | MS | 2011/01/26 01:34 PM |
NAND flash latencies | slacker | 2011/01/26 07:14 PM |
NAND flash latencies | iz | 2011/01/26 08:18 PM |
NAND flash latencies -- Correction | slacker | 2011/01/26 08:58 PM |
NAND flash latencies -- Correction | iz | 2011/01/27 12:58 AM |
NAND flash latencies -- Correction | David Kanter | 2011/01/27 01:54 AM |
NAND flash latencies -- Correction | Ricardo B | 2011/01/27 04:42 AM |
NAND flash latencies -- Correction | iz | 2011/01/27 07:54 PM |
NAND flash latencies -- Correction | Ricardo B | 2011/01/28 06:02 AM |
NAND flash latencies -- Correction | MS | 2011/01/28 03:06 PM |
NAND flash latencies -- Correction | iz | 2011/01/28 05:12 PM |
Relative latency | Ricardo B | 2011/01/26 03:23 PM |
Relative latency | MS | 2011/01/26 04:16 PM |
TRIM Linus is right | James | 2011/01/26 05:26 AM |
TRIM Linus is right | gallier2 | 2011/01/25 02:46 PM |
TRIM Linus is right | MS | 2011/01/25 03:10 PM |
Linus is HALF right | Darrell Coker | 2011/01/25 07:36 PM |
Linus is HALF right | Ricardo B | 2011/01/26 01:52 AM |
EXT4 *not* heavily optimized for rotating media | ? | 2011/01/26 02:34 AM |
TRIM | Anon | 2011/01/25 09:00 PM |
The alternative to TRIM | Max | 2011/01/20 11:35 AM |
The alternative to TRIM | anon | 2011/01/20 04:57 PM |
The alternative to TRIM | Max | 2011/01/21 02:27 AM |
The alternative to TRIM | Dan Downs | 2011/01/20 05:18 PM |
The alternative to TRIM | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 05:34 PM |
The alternative to TRIM | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/20 06:16 PM |
The alternative to TRIM | Gabriele Svelto | 2011/01/22 02:10 AM |
The alternative to TRIM | Dan Downs | 2011/01/20 07:12 PM |
The alternative to TRIM | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 08:34 PM |
Another Alternative to Trim | Mark Christiansen | 2011/01/22 12:07 PM |
Another Alternative to Trim | iz | 2011/01/22 06:43 PM |
Another Alternative to Trim | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/22 09:12 PM |
Another Alternative to Trim | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/23 02:01 AM |
Another Alternative to Trim | iz | 2011/01/23 05:20 AM |
Another Alternative to Trim | mpx | 2011/01/23 12:00 PM |
Another Alternative to Trim | iz | 2011/01/23 06:10 PM |
TRIM vs. GC for SSD Longevity | mpx | 2011/01/20 02:19 PM |
TRIM vs. GC for SSD Longevity | iz | 2011/01/20 07:05 PM |
TRIM vs. GC for SSD Longevity | mpx | 2011/01/21 03:29 AM |
TRIM vs. GC for SSD Longevity | anon | 2011/01/21 07:51 PM |
TRIM vs. GC for SSD Longevity | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/20 08:42 PM |
TRIM vs. GC for SSD Longevity | MS | 2011/01/21 06:07 PM |
Quad pixel? | Anon | 2011/01/19 10:48 PM |
Quad pixel? | mpx | 2011/01/20 08:40 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Rob Thorpe | 2011/01/19 01:57 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Brett | 2011/01/19 03:35 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/19 08:30 PM |
Apollo Computer | Brett | 2011/01/19 09:52 PM |
iPad 2 display same as iPad | David Kanter | 2011/02/02 11:12 AM |
iPad 2 display same as iPad | Brett | 2011/02/02 01:30 PM |
iPad 2 display same as iPad | Mark Roulo | 2011/02/02 02:25 PM |
iPad 2 display same as iPad | Brett | 2011/02/02 02:59 PM |
iPad 2 display same as iPad | Richard Cownie | 2011/02/03 10:30 AM |
iPad 2 display same as iPad | Anon | 2011/02/02 04:08 PM |
iPad 2 display same as iPad | Rob Thorpe | 2011/02/03 11:42 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Ungo | 2011/01/19 05:54 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | mpx | 2011/01/15 01:32 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/17 04:20 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | slacker | 2011/01/15 04:03 PM |
Intel GMs for low-end | David Kanter | 2011/01/18 11:05 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/14 09:29 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | a reader | 2011/01/14 07:25 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Foo_ | 2011/01/15 03:12 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Matt Sayler | 2011/01/15 12:25 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | IntelUser2000 | 2011/01/16 05:20 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Matt Sayler | 2011/01/16 06:02 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Megol | 2011/01/17 10:18 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Brett | 2011/01/17 04:58 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Louis Gerbarg | 2011/01/17 06:12 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Brett | 2011/01/17 08:06 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Louis Gerbarg | 2011/01/18 10:13 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Rob Thorpe | 2011/01/18 03:23 PM |
Nice post | David Kanter | 2011/01/18 11:38 AM |
New MacBook Pros are getting closer | Matt Sayler | 2011/02/24 09:46 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | ? | 2011/01/16 09:29 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | anon | 2011/01/16 10:08 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Gabriele Svelto | 2011/01/17 12:43 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Robert Myers | 2011/01/14 06:29 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Max | 2011/01/15 07:18 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Groo | 2011/01/12 04:59 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Wilco | 2011/01/12 05:40 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Groo | 2011/01/12 09:14 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Adrian | 2011/01/13 02:35 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Paul | 2011/01/13 05:19 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Adrian | 2011/01/14 03:50 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Wilco | 2011/01/14 07:00 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | none | 2011/01/14 07:26 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Wilco | 2011/01/14 07:46 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | none | 2011/01/14 08:02 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Linus Torvalds | 2011/01/14 09:42 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Richard Cownie | 2011/01/14 10:06 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | someone | 2011/01/14 11:20 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | fastpathguru | 2011/01/14 12:22 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Richard Cownie | 2011/01/14 06:01 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Aaron Spink | 2011/01/15 06:07 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | slacker | 2011/01/15 04:08 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Jukka Larja | 2011/01/16 01:44 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | mpx | 2011/01/15 05:08 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | Paul | 2011/01/15 09:20 AM |
The ARM story: 64 bit or bust? | Kevin G | 2011/01/14 05:21 PM |
The ARM story: 64 bit or bust? | someone | 2011/01/15 10:48 AM |
Bye, bye native binary | mpx | 2011/01/15 12:51 AM |
Bye, bye native binary | Exophase | 2011/01/18 06:39 PM |
RISC with 16 GPRs!? | anon | 2011/01/19 05:42 PM |
RISC with 16 GPRs!? | Exophase | 2011/01/19 06:20 PM |
doomed ARM sells 6B cores/year | Richard Cownie | 2011/01/19 10:01 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | anon | 2011/01/12 10:30 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | mpx | 2011/01/13 04:05 AM |
Not a chance in hell | Rohit | 2011/01/12 07:49 AM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | notsure | 2011/01/12 12:39 PM |
The ARM story: Earthquake looming? | mpx | 2011/01/13 04:27 AM |
The _Android_ story: Earthquake looming? | fastpathguru | 2011/01/13 11:50 AM |
Internet + web apps + multimedia = enabler | mpx | 2011/01/14 02:11 AM |
The _Android_ story: Earthquake looming? | Will Smith | 2011/01/14 09:48 AM |
Notebook vendors show no interest in Oak Trail | Nicki Minaj | 2011/01/16 06:37 PM |