Article: IEDM 2010 Process Technology Update
By: IntelUser2000 (Intel_user2000.delete@this.yahoo.ca), February 17, 2011 9:21 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 2/15/11 wrote:
---------------------------
>>2. Isn't the top metal 7um thick, not 8um ?
>
>It's 7um.
>
>David
That's kinda strange. Intel's 32nm SoC presentation shows 8um thick M9: http://download.intel.com/technology/architecture-silicon/32nm/IEDM_09_P1268_abstract.pdf
---------------------------
>>2. Isn't the top metal 7um thick, not 8um ?
>
>It's 7um.
>
>David
That's kinda strange. Intel's 32nm SoC presentation shows 8um thick M9: http://download.intel.com/technology/architecture-silicon/32nm/IEDM_09_P1268_abstract.pdf
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
IEDM 2010 article online | David Kanter | 2011/02/15 01:59 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | Ricardo B | 2011/02/15 05:54 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | David Kanter | 2011/02/15 09:37 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | Ricardo B | 2011/02/15 03:03 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | slacker | 2011/02/15 06:15 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | IntelUser2000 | 2011/02/15 06:54 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | David Kanter | 2011/02/15 08:49 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | David Hess | 2011/02/16 02:40 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | Ricardo B | 2011/02/16 07:01 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | IntelUser2000 | 2011/02/17 09:21 AM |
Answer: 8um | slacker | 2011/02/17 10:01 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | someone | 2011/02/17 09:14 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | iz | 2011/02/17 06:31 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | iz | 2011/02/17 07:04 PM |
Also fixed | David Kanter | 2011/02/17 07:47 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | David Kanter | 2011/02/17 07:43 PM |