Article: IEDM 2010 Process Technology Update
By: slacker (s.delete@this.lack.er), February 17, 2011 10:01 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
High-perf process: M9 = 8um thick
Natarajan, 2008 - "A 32nm Logic Technology Featuring 2nd-Generation High-k + Metal-Gate Transistors, Enhanced Channel Strain and 0.171um2 SRAM Cell Size in a 291Mb Array"
Packan, 2009 - "High Performance 32nm Logic Technology Featuring 2nd Generation High-k + Metal Gate Transistors"
SOC process: M9 = 8um thick
C-H Jan, 2009 - "A 32nm SoC Platform Technology with 2nd Generation High-k/Metal Gate Transistors Optimized for Ultra Low Power, High Performance, and High Density Product Applications"
The reason I thought it was 7um is because I had read the following, pre-print version of the SOC paper. It claimed that M9 was 7um thick, but the official paper submitted to IEDM claims it is 8um thick (the same as the high-performance processes).
http://download.intel.com/technology/architecture-silicon/32nm/IEDM_09_32nm_SOC_abstract.pdf
Natarajan, 2008 - "A 32nm Logic Technology Featuring 2nd-Generation High-k + Metal-Gate Transistors, Enhanced Channel Strain and 0.171um2 SRAM Cell Size in a 291Mb Array"
Packan, 2009 - "High Performance 32nm Logic Technology Featuring 2nd Generation High-k + Metal Gate Transistors"
SOC process: M9 = 8um thick
C-H Jan, 2009 - "A 32nm SoC Platform Technology with 2nd Generation High-k/Metal Gate Transistors Optimized for Ultra Low Power, High Performance, and High Density Product Applications"
The reason I thought it was 7um is because I had read the following, pre-print version of the SOC paper. It claimed that M9 was 7um thick, but the official paper submitted to IEDM claims it is 8um thick (the same as the high-performance processes).
http://download.intel.com/technology/architecture-silicon/32nm/IEDM_09_32nm_SOC_abstract.pdf
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
IEDM 2010 article online | David Kanter | 2011/02/15 01:59 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | Ricardo B | 2011/02/15 05:54 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | David Kanter | 2011/02/15 09:37 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | Ricardo B | 2011/02/15 03:03 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | slacker | 2011/02/15 06:15 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | IntelUser2000 | 2011/02/15 06:54 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | David Kanter | 2011/02/15 08:49 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | David Hess | 2011/02/16 02:40 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | Ricardo B | 2011/02/16 07:01 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | IntelUser2000 | 2011/02/17 09:21 AM |
Answer: 8um | slacker | 2011/02/17 10:01 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | someone | 2011/02/17 09:14 AM |
IEDM 2010 article online | iz | 2011/02/17 06:31 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | iz | 2011/02/17 07:04 PM |
Also fixed | David Kanter | 2011/02/17 07:47 PM |
IEDM 2010 article online | David Kanter | 2011/02/17 07:43 PM |