Article: 22nm Design Challenges at ISSCC 2011
By: Rob Thorpe (rthorpe.delete@this.robertthorpeconsulting.com), March 15, 2011 4:42 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
mpx (mpx@nomail.pl) on 3/15/11 wrote:
---------------------------
>Assume you have a talented person. A person who has many possible career paths available.
>Wouldn't EE/IT/programing career be not well paid as normalized by this person abilities?
>So if a young person good at math and physics sorts all careers available for him
>by income, then EE will never be on top or even close to the top? Eg. such person
>can easily enter the world of finances or other where they pay better. And if a
>person is generally talented (not only in sciences) then a career in sales or management
>may be much more profitable than working as an engeneer.
>
>People from poor countries may find an engeneering job in a rich country attractive
>because it may still pay better than being a lawyer or lower-level manager in their native country.
I think you're right about that. And I think Nathan makes a good point about the threat of outsourcing. A colleague of mine brought up both when discussing hiring today.
But, in some ways it's quite complicated. After our discussion I tried to find out the salary progression of various careers. I couldn't find any really good data.
If we ask, what career path is a good choice to take before university the answer isn't really clear because all the drop out rates aren't clear. I know when I went to university that those who graduated from accountancy and got careers as accountants had high earnings. But, lots of students did accountancy for a year then dropped it and started something else. Many who finished the course never became accountants. So, the whole picture isn't really clear.
What I've noticed (and I may be wrong) is that those who make it into finance and management do very well if they stay there for a few years and become established. But, lots of people don't get past that hurdle.
I think a great deal of it has to do with "coolness" of one sort or other. I know loads of unemployed 25-28 year olds who did ID design and product design at university. I think this was the inspiration of the iPod. Electronics has never been cool, but I think it's currently less cool than it was.
---------------------------
>Assume you have a talented person. A person who has many possible career paths available.
>Wouldn't EE/IT/programing career be not well paid as normalized by this person abilities?
>So if a young person good at math and physics sorts all careers available for him
>by income, then EE will never be on top or even close to the top? Eg. such person
>can easily enter the world of finances or other where they pay better. And if a
>person is generally talented (not only in sciences) then a career in sales or management
>may be much more profitable than working as an engeneer.
>
>People from poor countries may find an engeneering job in a rich country attractive
>because it may still pay better than being a lawyer or lower-level manager in their native country.
I think you're right about that. And I think Nathan makes a good point about the threat of outsourcing. A colleague of mine brought up both when discussing hiring today.
But, in some ways it's quite complicated. After our discussion I tried to find out the salary progression of various careers. I couldn't find any really good data.
If we ask, what career path is a good choice to take before university the answer isn't really clear because all the drop out rates aren't clear. I know when I went to university that those who graduated from accountancy and got careers as accountants had high earnings. But, lots of students did accountancy for a year then dropped it and started something else. Many who finished the course never became accountants. So, the whole picture isn't really clear.
What I've noticed (and I may be wrong) is that those who make it into finance and management do very well if they stay there for a few years and become established. But, lots of people don't get past that hurdle.
I think a great deal of it has to do with "coolness" of one sort or other. I know loads of unemployed 25-28 year olds who did ID design and product design at university. I think this was the inspiration of the iPod. Electronics has never been cool, but I think it's currently less cool than it was.
| Topic | Posted By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Design Challenges at 22nm Article | David Kanter | 2011/03/14 01:36 AM |
| Design Challenges at 22nm Article | Dean Calver | 2011/03/14 02:06 AM |
| Design Challenges at 22nm Article | David Kanter | 2011/03/14 09:06 PM |
| Design Challenges at 22nm Article | savantu | 2011/03/15 05:25 AM |
| Roots of this problem go way back. | someone | 2011/03/14 07:00 AM |
| Education | Moritz | 2011/03/15 04:42 AM |
| Education | someone | 2011/03/15 07:26 AM |
| Education | Moritz | 2011/03/15 12:44 PM |
| Education | sylt | 2011/03/18 10:31 AM |
| Roots of this problem go way back. | Rob Thorpe | 2011/03/15 06:25 AM |
| Roots of this problem go way back. | someone | 2011/03/15 07:20 AM |
| Roots of this problem go way back. | Nathan Monson | 2011/03/15 09:17 AM |
| Roots of this problem go way back. | mpx | 2011/03/15 12:55 PM |
| Roots of this problem go way back. | Mark Roulo | 2011/03/15 02:34 PM |
| Roots of this problem go way back. | Rob Thorpe | 2011/03/15 04:42 PM |
| Roots of this problem go way back. | Paul | 2011/03/15 05:03 PM |
| Roots of this problem go way back. | Dean Kent | 2011/03/15 08:11 AM |
| Design Challenges at 22nm Article | Daniel Bizo | 2011/03/14 07:06 AM |
| Design Challenges at 22nm Article | Linus Torvalds | 2011/03/14 09:48 AM |
| Design Challenges at 22nm Article | David Kanter | 2011/03/14 09:20 PM |
| Design Challenges at 22nm Article | Dean Kent | 2011/03/15 08:16 AM |
| Design Challenges at 22nm Article | David Kanter | 2011/03/14 10:05 AM |
| Could you elaborate? | Daniel Bizó | 2011/03/16 06:43 AM |
| IDM trade offs | David Kanter | 2011/03/16 10:54 AM |
| Design Challenges at 22nm Article | Tianyi | 2012/10/18 12:24 AM |
