tick-tock

Article: Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate Transistors
By: joset (joset_pt.delete@this.yahoo.com), May 6, 2011 5:20 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
anon (anon@anon.com) on 5/6/11 wrote:
---------------------------
>joset (joset_pt@yahoo.com) on 5/6/11 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Daniel Bizo (dbizo@idc.com) on 5/6/11 wrote:
>>---------------------------
>>>David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 5/6/11 wrote:
>>>---------------------------
>>>>someone (someone@somewhere.com) on 5/6/11 wrote:
>>>>---------------------------
>>>>>David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 5/6/11 wrote:
>>>>>---------------------------
>>>>>>New article up:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>For over 40 years, the planar transistor has been the keystone of the semiconductor
>>>>>>industry. Intel's new 22nm tri-gate transistor is revolutionary, moving transistors
>>>>>>into a three dimensional world. After 10 years of research, this novel structure
>>>>>>is the next step for Moore's Law and promises to substantially improve performance and power efficiency.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT050511195446
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Historically, Intel’s SOC manufacturing lags 12 months behind their high performance
>>>>>process. Their first fully integrated SOC (32nm Medfield) has yet to ship in products,
>>>>>and is expected in the latter half of this year. If Intel aggressively moves forward
>>>>>at 22nm, their SOCs might follow high performance manufacturing by 6 months."
>>>>>
>>>>>Intel stated in a recent process technology paper that it
>>>>>would put the mainstream and SoC variants of its 22 nm
>>>>>technology into production at the same time.
>>>>
>>>>I recall them saying they would move them closer, I don't recall the same release
>>>>time. That would be even better than a 6 month gap.
>>>>
>>>>>Of course an appropriate SoC based product design has
>>>>>to be ready to go to make it worthwhile.
>>>>
>>>>Not just the SOC, but the software, etc.
>>>>
>>>>David
>>>
>>>Based on Intel's briefing my interpretation is that they will move Atom, and their
>>>LP processes on parity with the HP parts by the 14nm node. So it is moving closer
>>>and closer by every node, since Atoms are on a much-much shorter cycle by now, and
>>>will get in synch with the tick-tock thing by the time 14nm is HVM-ready. Plus a
>>>quarter or two, of course, given the engeneering and ramping limitations.
>>
>>
>>On a side-note, "Ivy-Bridge" was to be Intel's next "tick" (basically, a node technology
>>transition); however then, this tri-gate implementation is truly a microarchitectural
>>innovation per se, making it a "tock" instead.
>>As far as I'm aware, this is the second major change in Intel's "tick/tock" 'algorithm',
>>since the implementation of a high-k dielectric. Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
>I think you are wrong. One is changing microarchitecture, the other is changing manufacturing process.


Well, I wouldn't consider going from planar to 3D a manufacturing issue (although it's implicit, from node to node). It's, certainly, a paradigm shift in CMOS transistor design, from geometry to [almost] any other metric one might consider. My take, anyway.


Cheers!
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorsDavid Kanter2011/05/06 12:27 AM
  Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorsa reader2011/05/06 08:42 AM
  Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorssomeone2011/05/06 10:56 AM
    Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorsDavid Kanter2011/05/06 11:30 AM
      tick-tockDaniel Bizo2011/05/06 02:06 PM
        tick-tockjoset2011/05/06 04:22 PM
          tick-tockanon2011/05/06 04:30 PM
            tick-tockjoset2011/05/06 05:20 PM
              tick-tockanon2011/05/06 09:08 PM
              tick-tockhobold2011/05/07 03:15 PM
                tick-tockIntelUser20002011/05/07 03:20 PM
                22nm - all 3D, all the timeDavid Kanter2011/05/08 01:08 PM
                  22nm - all 3D, all the timeRaf2011/05/09 09:41 AM
          tick-tockArcadian2011/05/07 02:07 PM
            tick-tockjoset2011/05/07 07:18 PM
              tick-tockDan Downs2011/05/08 05:22 AM
                tick-tockjoset2011/05/08 07:08 PM
                  tick-tockJouni Osmala2011/05/08 08:09 PM
                    tick-tockmere mortal2011/05/09 03:53 AM
                      i didn't understood, you may be right, thanks. :) (NT)Daniel Bizo2011/05/09 09:13 AM
                      tick-tockjoset2011/05/09 04:28 PM
                        tick-tockDan Downs2011/05/09 06:45 PM
                          tick-tockjoset2011/05/09 08:31 PM
          tick-tockJack2011/05/12 05:20 PM
            tick-tockjoset2011/05/13 06:48 PM
  Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorsHans de Vries2011/05/08 06:33 PM
    FD-SOIDavid Kanter2011/05/08 07:29 PM
      FD-SOIHans de Vries2011/05/08 09:06 PM
        FD-SOIDavid Kanter2011/05/08 11:57 PM
    Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorsAaron Spink2011/05/08 09:48 PM
    interview with finfet+fd-soi inventorjokerman2011/05/09 10:51 PM
  Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorsajensen2011/05/09 09:13 PM
  As big as they make it?Erik2011/05/10 11:26 AM
    As big as they make it?David Kanter2011/05/10 03:17 PM
      As big as they make it?gruehunter2011/05/10 05:43 PM
        As big as they make it?David Kanter2011/05/10 06:53 PM
    As big as they make it?ajensen2011/05/10 10:58 PM
    As big as they make it? me: yesMoritz2011/05/11 11:20 PM
  Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorsMr. Camel2011/05/18 07:41 AM
    Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorssomeone2011/05/18 10:00 AM
      Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorsMr. Camel2011/05/18 11:54 AM
        Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorssomeone2011/05/18 03:10 PM
          Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorsDaniel Bizo2011/05/19 03:59 AM
            Intel's 22nm Tri-Gate transistorssomeone2011/05/19 06:17 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?