By: Adrian (a.delete@this.acm.org), June 22, 2011 5:13 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Moritz (better@not.tell) on 6/22/11 wrote:
---------------------------
>I understand that heat increases tunneling and the resistance of metal,
>but why of semiconductors?
>I guess most dopant's are available for movement at below 0°C (N_A/D~=n_A/D) ,
>but isn't the rule, that more electrons get available with temperature? what about
>NTC-Thermistors ? Are there more electrons available, but the effect is off-set by collisions, leakage, ?
>
The electrical resistivity of any conducting medium depends both on the concentration of the electricity carriers and of the resistance that opposes to their movement (the reciprocal of the carrier mobility).
The mobility of the carriers in solid or liquid substances almost always decreases with the temperature. Therefore, if the concentration of carriers is constant, the resistivity increases with temperature.
Most semiconductor devices, except for NTC thermistors, are made of doped semiconductors, in order to have a certain predictable carrier concentration. In that case, in a large temperature interval, which includes the operating range of the device, the carrier concentration is almost constant (because the concentration of the thermally-generated carriers is much less than that of the carriers generated by dopant ionization), so the resistivity increases with temperature.
At very low temperatures the resistivity decreases with temperature because the carrier concentration increases due to the ionization of the dopants, while at very high temperatures the resistivity also decreases with temperature because the carrier concentration increases because the concentration of thermally-generated carriers becomes greater than the concentration of the dopants and dominates the total concentration.
---------------------------
>I understand that heat increases tunneling and the resistance of metal,
>but why of semiconductors?
>I guess most dopant's are available for movement at below 0°C (N_A/D~=n_A/D) ,
>but isn't the rule, that more electrons get available with temperature? what about
>NTC-Thermistors ? Are there more electrons available, but the effect is off-set by collisions, leakage, ?
>
The electrical resistivity of any conducting medium depends both on the concentration of the electricity carriers and of the resistance that opposes to their movement (the reciprocal of the carrier mobility).
The mobility of the carriers in solid or liquid substances almost always decreases with the temperature. Therefore, if the concentration of carriers is constant, the resistivity increases with temperature.
Most semiconductor devices, except for NTC thermistors, are made of doped semiconductors, in order to have a certain predictable carrier concentration. In that case, in a large temperature interval, which includes the operating range of the device, the carrier concentration is almost constant (because the concentration of the thermally-generated carriers is much less than that of the carriers generated by dopant ionization), so the resistivity increases with temperature.
At very low temperatures the resistivity decreases with temperature because the carrier concentration increases due to the ionization of the dopants, while at very high temperatures the resistivity also decreases with temperature because the carrier concentration increases because the concentration of thermally-generated carriers becomes greater than the concentration of the dopants and dominates the total concentration.
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
Article: Cooling and performance/watt | David Kanter | 2011/06/21 12:19 PM |
'temperature' not 'power'? | Paul A. Clayton | 2011/06/21 03:01 PM |
'temperature' not 'power'? | David Kanter | 2011/06/21 03:38 PM |
resistance(temperature) | Moritz | 2011/06/22 04:48 AM |
resistance(temperature) | Adrian | 2011/06/22 05:13 AM |
resistance(temperature) | David Hess | 2011/06/22 08:53 AM |
resistance(temperature) | Adrian | 2011/06/24 02:24 AM |
resistance(temperature) | David Hess | 2011/06/24 02:14 PM |
Article: Cooling and performance/watt | Ed Trice | 2011/06/22 10:57 AM |
Cooling | David Kanter | 2011/06/22 03:26 PM |
Cooling | Ed Trice | 2011/06/22 03:54 PM |
TE-elements | Moritz | 2011/06/23 05:55 AM |
Radiator placement and design | Ricardo B | 2011/06/23 07:34 AM |
TE-elements | EduardoS | 2011/06/23 04:21 PM |
water/air | Moritz | 2011/06/23 10:30 PM |
water/air | Ricardo B | 2011/06/24 02:29 PM |
water/air | bakaneko | 2011/06/24 09:45 PM |
water/air | David Hess | 2011/06/25 04:12 AM |
water/air | Ricardo B | 2011/06/25 06:07 AM |
water/air | ZaZa | 2011/06/25 09:47 AM |
water/air | Ricardo B | 2011/06/25 11:40 AM |
water/air | rwessel | 2011/06/26 03:43 AM |
water/air | ZaZa | 2011/06/26 04:05 PM |
Temperature inversion | Jonathan Kang | 2011/06/22 05:43 PM |
LN2 overclocking | Doug Siebert | 2011/06/25 01:32 PM |
Temperature inversion | Vincent Diepeveen | 2011/06/27 01:01 PM |
Temperature inversion | Anon | 2011/06/28 03:30 PM |
Temperature inversion | Jonathan Kang | 2011/07/05 06:38 PM |
Article: Cooling and performance/watt | (tm) | 2011/06/27 05:51 AM |
Article: Cooling and performance/watt | David | 2011/10/15 06:14 PM |
Article: Cooling and performance/watt | rwessel | 2011/10/15 09:56 PM |
Exponential growth of subthreshold leakage | Konrad Schwarz | 2011/12/15 07:56 AM |
Exponential growth of subthreshold leakage | Rohit | 2011/12/15 01:22 PM |
Exponential growth of subthreshold leakage | David Kanter | 2011/12/15 04:20 PM |
Exponential growth of subthreshold leakage | Iain McClatchie | 2013/01/07 12:28 AM |
Exponential growth of subthreshold leakage | Doug S | 2013/01/07 10:25 AM |
Exponential growth of subthreshold leakage | someone | 2013/01/07 11:12 PM |
Article: Cooling and performance/watt | Robert Pearson | 2021/07/26 09:45 AM |