Sandy Bridge GPU article online

Article: Intel's Sandy Bridge Graphics Architecture
By: IntelUser2000 (Intel_user2000.delete@this.yahoo.ca), August 11, 2011 3:17 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Groo (charlie@semiaccurate.com) on 8/10/11 wrote:
---------------------------
>On the windows side.....
>http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=99&Itemid=1&limit=1&limitstart=16
>
>I don't really use windows any more, so I can't say if things have gotten much
>better since, anyone know? Has anyone tried anything other than the major benchmarks that worked?
>
Windows side improved quite a lot since the May drivers. Actually I don't think it really had any meaningful OpenGL support until that driver. That driver brought hardware T&L/VS support for OpenGL, which was surprising because it means until May, OpenGL were running on software. Amusing, but they got around to it.

>Last, back to Linux, there is no driver package available from Intel. The only
>thing I can say is, "Really?". When asked, they do a BS song and dance about open
>vs closed, and if they put out a .DEB, they would have no other choice but to close
>the drivers. I got the speech 2-3 times and my jaw hit the floor. If they believed
>their words, they should be fired for incompetence. If they didn't, they were lying again.
>
>I am not sure which one it was, but it shouldn't have happened, period. Intel has
>the resources, and they are trying to be taken seriously as a software company,
>but you can't view the IDF site with your own OS. You also can't run said OS on
>Sandy with anything put painfully slow and buggy performance. The drivers are crap,
>and have been for years.

>Sandy is a MAJOR regression on that front, and when >asked....
>see above. It shattered my small but growing confidence in Intel, and kept me from a Sandy Laptop.
>

Uhh no, I think that decision was put in stone as soon as SA started putting AMD banners everywhere at the site. And also the same time when "Charlie-proprietary" Intel info was no longer being "leaked" to Charlie. I clearly remember the Core 2 Inquirer article where you were quite giddy about it. I understand, review/speculation sites need something to write about. And without it, no $$s come in. Even Anand expressed his disappointment at one point.

>On the flip side, AMD's drivers may not be great, but they worked from pretty close
>to day 1. Sandy is now 8 months old and still doesn't have a way for a Ubuntu user
>to get working drivers without jumping through hoops that 99.9% of users can't accomplish.
>It is a simple problem to solve, but Intel won't. The difference between the two
>companies is about as much of a polar opposite as one could imagine.
>
>As I said several times in the past, Intel should be embarrassed by Sandy and graphics.
>The hardware may be fine, but the software is a joke.
>
>-Charlie

The Phoronix site also claims if you know how to work around the Linux OS, then the driver support is equal/better than the open source from AMD/Nvidia. See with Windows, I'm stuck with what I have. If I had an option to improve it, I'd go through the compiling to get it work.

Plus how many non-Netbook users are stupid enough to use Linux and not know all the gritty details anyway?
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 03:53 AM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlinesJ2011/08/09 07:29 AM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 12:11 PM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineKevin G2011/08/09 07:32 AM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 12:14 PM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineanon2011/08/09 11:43 PM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineJosh2011/08/09 09:39 AM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineMr. Camel2011/08/09 12:39 PM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineJosh2011/08/09 12:48 PM
        Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 01:06 PM
          Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineJosh2011/08/09 01:18 PM
            Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 01:50 PM
              Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineJosh2011/08/09 02:22 PM
                Product release milestonesDavid Kanter2011/08/10 10:42 AM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineSeni2011/08/09 02:27 PM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 01:12 PM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlinerscheidegger2011/08/09 01:27 PM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 01:45 PM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlinerscheidegger2011/08/09 04:34 PM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlinerscheidegger2011/08/09 06:03 PM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineSi2011/08/10 05:15 AM
  Some error on the chart?Ron2011/08/10 09:33 AM
    Some error on the chart?David Kanter2011/08/10 10:35 AM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineGroo2011/08/10 10:01 AM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineArcadian2011/08/10 02:38 PM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineGroo2011/08/10 08:32 PM
        Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineIntelUser20002011/08/11 03:17 AM
          Sandy Bridge GPU article onlinePoindexter2011/08/11 04:51 AM
            Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineIntelUser20002011/08/11 08:32 AM
              Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineGroo2011/08/11 12:58 PM
                Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/12 03:16 PM
                  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineGroo2011/08/15 08:09 PM
                    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/16 01:00 AM
        Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineLinus Torvalds2011/08/11 11:20 AM
          Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineGroo2011/08/11 12:51 PM
        AMD could be worse.Jouni Osmala2011/08/11 11:50 PM
          AMD could be worse.bakaneko2011/08/12 01:53 AM
  OpenCL, Compute Shader 4.x Support, and OpenGL 3.1 Supportltcommander.data2011/08/10 03:02 PM
    OpenCL, Compute Shader 4.x Support, and OpenGL 3.1 SupportDavid Kanter2011/08/10 06:01 PM
      OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastMark Roulo2011/08/15 03:30 PM
        OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastRohit2011/08/15 06:52 PM
        OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastDavid Kanter2011/08/15 07:24 PM
          OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastMark Roulo2011/08/16 06:47 AM
            OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastDavid Kanter2011/08/16 07:49 AM
        OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastSylvain Collange2011/08/16 03:04 AM
    OpenCL, Compute Shader 4.x Support, and OpenGL 3.1 SupportSylvain Collange2011/08/13 07:54 AM
  How much raw computer resources?Robert Davide Graham2011/08/12 12:02 PM
    How much raw computer resources?David Kanter2011/08/12 12:25 PM
      How much raw computer resources?Robert David Graham2011/08/12 07:44 PM
        How much raw computer resources?Nicolas Capens2011/08/14 11:51 PM
          How much raw computer resources?Robert David Graham2011/08/15 11:54 AM
            How much raw computer resources?Michael S2011/08/15 03:08 PM
            How much raw computer resources?David Kanter2011/08/15 07:28 PM
              Bitcoin miner: a benchmarkRobert Daivid Graham2011/08/16 04:03 PM
                Bitcoin miner: a benchmark?David Kanter2011/08/16 04:31 PM
                  Buying with bitcoinsRohit2011/08/16 07:11 PM
                    Buying with bitcoinsDavid Kanter2011/08/16 08:34 PM
                      Buying with bitcoinsRobert David Graham2011/08/17 06:47 PM
                  aside: bitcoinhobold2011/08/17 03:47 AM
                  Bitcoin miner: a benchmark?Max2011/08/18 03:54 AM
                  Bitcoin miner: a benchmark?etzel2011/08/18 07:52 AM
    How much raw computer resources?Nicolas Capens2011/08/14 12:04 PM
  I hate to be the text critic...A Hobbit2011/08/19 12:59 AM
    You're rightDavid Kanter2011/08/19 09:16 PM
      Fixed (NT)David Kanter2011/08/19 09:30 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?