How much raw computer resources?

Article: Intel's Sandy Bridge Graphics Architecture
By: Nicolas Capens (nicolas.capens.delete@this.gmail.com), August 14, 2011 12:04 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Hi Robert,

Robert Davide Graham (bigrobg@gmail.com) on 8/12/11 wrote:
---------------------------
>From your article, it seems that I can execute 6 instructions per clock (because
>there's 6 units), each of which operates on 4 data, times 0.85 GHz. In contrast,
>the Sandy Bridge CPU core can execute 2 instructions per clock, also 4 data, but
>at three times the clock speed, thus achieving the same overall compute throughput.
>
>Are these numbers correct?

AVX instructions can process 8 single-precision floating-point numbers per cycle. Sandy Bridge has a separate multiplication and addition unit, so it can perform 16 operations per cycle per core. For a quad-core at 3.4 GHz, that's 217.6 GFLOPS.

The HD Graphics 3000 has 12 cores, each capable of 4 multiply-add operations per clock. At 1.35 GHz, this results in 129.6 GFLOPS.

In the future the CPU cores will become even more powerful. Haswell will support AVX2, which includes fused multiply-add instructions, and best of all, gather operations.

Cheers,
Nicolas
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 03:53 AM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlinesJ2011/08/09 07:29 AM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 12:11 PM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineKevin G2011/08/09 07:32 AM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 12:14 PM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineanon2011/08/09 11:43 PM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineJosh2011/08/09 09:39 AM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineMr. Camel2011/08/09 12:39 PM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineJosh2011/08/09 12:48 PM
        Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 01:06 PM
          Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineJosh2011/08/09 01:18 PM
            Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 01:50 PM
              Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineJosh2011/08/09 02:22 PM
                Product release milestonesDavid Kanter2011/08/10 10:42 AM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineSeni2011/08/09 02:27 PM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 01:12 PM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlinerscheidegger2011/08/09 01:27 PM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/09 01:45 PM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlinerscheidegger2011/08/09 04:34 PM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlinerscheidegger2011/08/09 06:03 PM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineSi2011/08/10 05:15 AM
  Some error on the chart?Ron2011/08/10 09:33 AM
    Some error on the chart?David Kanter2011/08/10 10:35 AM
  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineGroo2011/08/10 10:01 AM
    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineArcadian2011/08/10 02:38 PM
      Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineGroo2011/08/10 08:32 PM
        Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineIntelUser20002011/08/11 03:17 AM
          Sandy Bridge GPU article onlinePoindexter2011/08/11 04:51 AM
            Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineIntelUser20002011/08/11 08:32 AM
              Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineGroo2011/08/11 12:58 PM
                Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/12 03:16 PM
                  Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineGroo2011/08/15 08:09 PM
                    Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineDavid Kanter2011/08/16 01:00 AM
        Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineLinus Torvalds2011/08/11 11:20 AM
          Sandy Bridge GPU article onlineGroo2011/08/11 12:51 PM
        AMD could be worse.Jouni Osmala2011/08/11 11:50 PM
          AMD could be worse.bakaneko2011/08/12 01:53 AM
  OpenCL, Compute Shader 4.x Support, and OpenGL 3.1 Supportltcommander.data2011/08/10 03:02 PM
    OpenCL, Compute Shader 4.x Support, and OpenGL 3.1 SupportDavid Kanter2011/08/10 06:01 PM
      OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastMark Roulo2011/08/15 03:30 PM
        OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastRohit2011/08/15 06:52 PM
        OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastDavid Kanter2011/08/15 07:24 PM
          OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastMark Roulo2011/08/16 06:47 AM
            OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastDavid Kanter2011/08/16 07:49 AM
        OpenCL should be able to run on x86 ... but probably not fastSylvain Collange2011/08/16 03:04 AM
    OpenCL, Compute Shader 4.x Support, and OpenGL 3.1 SupportSylvain Collange2011/08/13 07:54 AM
  How much raw computer resources?Robert Davide Graham2011/08/12 12:02 PM
    How much raw computer resources?David Kanter2011/08/12 12:25 PM
      How much raw computer resources?Robert David Graham2011/08/12 07:44 PM
        How much raw computer resources?Nicolas Capens2011/08/14 11:51 PM
          How much raw computer resources?Robert David Graham2011/08/15 11:54 AM
            How much raw computer resources?Michael S2011/08/15 03:08 PM
            How much raw computer resources?David Kanter2011/08/15 07:28 PM
              Bitcoin miner: a benchmarkRobert Daivid Graham2011/08/16 04:03 PM
                Bitcoin miner: a benchmark?David Kanter2011/08/16 04:31 PM
                  Buying with bitcoinsRohit2011/08/16 07:11 PM
                    Buying with bitcoinsDavid Kanter2011/08/16 08:34 PM
                      Buying with bitcoinsRobert David Graham2011/08/17 06:47 PM
                  aside: bitcoinhobold2011/08/17 03:47 AM
                  Bitcoin miner: a benchmark?Max2011/08/18 03:54 AM
                  Bitcoin miner: a benchmark?etzel2011/08/18 07:52 AM
    How much raw computer resources?Nicolas Capens2011/08/14 12:04 PM
  I hate to be the text critic...A Hobbit2011/08/19 12:59 AM
    You're rightDavid Kanter2011/08/19 09:16 PM
      Fixed (NT)David Kanter2011/08/19 09:30 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell tangerine? 🍊