Article: Llano at Hot Chips
By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), August 31, 2011 6:07 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
MS (ms@lostcircuits.com) on 8/31/11 wrote:
---------------------------
>David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 8/31/11 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>AMD’s Hot Chips presentation delved into Llano, the first mainstream Fusion product,
>>with details and results for power management. Previous disclosures painted a poor
>>picture, which is far from the truth. Given the older CPU and GPU designs and time-to-market
>>pressure, the results are quite good. Llano’s power management focuses on the most
>>important aspects and is a solid foundation for future generations that will be much more power aware and optimized.
>>
>>http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT083111130632
>>
>>As always, we encourage feedback and discussions.
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>
>>David
>
>The IPC improvements are mostly myth and Llano is a power >hog compared to SB so
>I would argue that all the listed improvements are only >for the purpose of not making it really bad.
When you say Llano is a power hog, what do you mean: Active, active/idle or true idle (or perhaps all 3)?
AMD's numbers indicated that their battery life should be reasonable, although I wasn't able to really dig into the fine print.
David
---------------------------
>David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 8/31/11 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>AMD’s Hot Chips presentation delved into Llano, the first mainstream Fusion product,
>>with details and results for power management. Previous disclosures painted a poor
>>picture, which is far from the truth. Given the older CPU and GPU designs and time-to-market
>>pressure, the results are quite good. Llano’s power management focuses on the most
>>important aspects and is a solid foundation for future generations that will be much more power aware and optimized.
>>
>>http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT083111130632
>>
>>As always, we encourage feedback and discussions.
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>
>>David
>
>The IPC improvements are mostly myth and Llano is a power >hog compared to SB so
>I would argue that all the listed improvements are only >for the purpose of not making it really bad.
When you say Llano is a power hog, what do you mean: Active, active/idle or true idle (or perhaps all 3)?
AMD's numbers indicated that their battery life should be reasonable, although I wasn't able to really dig into the fine print.
David
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | David Kanter | 2011/08/31 12:32 PM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | MS | 2011/08/31 01:22 PM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | David Kanter | 2011/08/31 06:07 PM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | MS | 2011/09/01 08:16 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | David Kanter | 2011/09/01 01:52 PM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | Gionatan Danti | 2011/09/01 02:53 AM |
Links are ok | David Kanter | 2011/09/01 04:02 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | iz | 2011/09/01 02:07 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | Gionatan Danti | 2011/09/01 03:01 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | David Kanter | 2011/09/01 04:08 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | iz | 2011/09/02 01:04 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | iz | 2011/09/01 02:08 AM |
More fusion, how? | Moritz | 2011/09/04 12:33 AM |
More fusion, how? | Rohit | 2011/09/04 09:27 AM |