Article: Llano at Hot Chips
By: Rohit (.delete@this..), September 4, 2011 9:27 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Moritz (better@not.tell) on 9/4/11 wrote:
---------------------------
>What do they mean by further integration than now?
>Are they going to kill x87, SEE, AVX?
>Bulldozer is already "outsourcing" it.
>Could they / will they copy/connect the AVX registers to the GPU and let it do the processing of multiple (>4) cores?
>I can not imagine how that could be done. It would save area on the CPU and make better use of it in general.
Fusing at MMU and runtime level would be a nice start.
---------------------------
>What do they mean by further integration than now?
>Are they going to kill x87, SEE, AVX?
>Bulldozer is already "outsourcing" it.
>Could they / will they copy/connect the AVX registers to the GPU and let it do the processing of multiple (>4) cores?
>I can not imagine how that could be done. It would save area on the CPU and make better use of it in general.
Fusing at MMU and runtime level would be a nice start.
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | David Kanter | 2011/08/31 12:32 PM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | MS | 2011/08/31 01:22 PM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | David Kanter | 2011/08/31 06:07 PM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | MS | 2011/09/01 08:16 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | David Kanter | 2011/09/01 01:52 PM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | Gionatan Danti | 2011/09/01 02:53 AM |
Links are ok | David Kanter | 2011/09/01 04:02 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | iz | 2011/09/01 02:07 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | Gionatan Danti | 2011/09/01 03:01 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | David Kanter | 2011/09/01 04:08 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | iz | 2011/09/02 01:04 AM |
Article: Llano Hot Chips Update | iz | 2011/09/01 02:08 AM |
More fusion, how? | Moritz | 2011/09/04 12:33 AM |
More fusion, how? | Rohit | 2011/09/04 09:27 AM |