ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV

Article: AMD's Mobile Strategy
By: Linus Torvalds (torvalds.delete@this.linux-foundation.org), December 18, 2011 12:48 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Michael S (already5chosen@yahoo.com) on 12/18/11 wrote:
>
>Why post-Pentium 4?

Because P4 wanted simple instructions. Really.

>All pre-Pentium-M Intel CPUs starting from i486 and, may be, even from i386 prefer,
>as general code generation strategy, code that consists of minimal # of uOps.

Yes. But with the various decode rules added in. And in
reality, decode rules were much more important than the
uop count rules, because the uop counts were usually fairly
close.

So in practince, counting uops is totally secondary.

>So, I'd say that RISC-like code generation is most useful for P5 and P6.

No. For P5, the dual pairing rules were most important,
and had nothing to do with RISC-like decode. You wanted
to get the whole U/V pipe thing right, in order to actually
issue two instructions at a time.

For P6, the 3-1-1 pattern was the primary thing to keep in
mind, but it didn't care that deeply about the uops.

It's most important for P4. I'm not sure exactly why that
is the case, but I suspect it is because it ends up
relaxing scheduling in the trace cache or something. The
exact rules for how many trace cache entries are used in
P4 (and the alignment in the trace cache) are complex and
odd.

IOW, for P4 it's not just about number of uops, it's about
how they pack in that dang trace cache.

>Pentium4, on the other hand, handles load-op and load-op-store instructions no better and
>no worse than equivalent 2 or 3 instr. RISC-like sequences. So, I'd expect from
>Pentium4-oriented compiler to emit such sequences opportunistically in order to improve code density.

Look again. Seriously. Just read the Intel optimization
manual. It is very clear, and for the longest time made
it a rule that you shouldn't use load-op instructions, you
should do loads and separate ops.

And the reason they said that was that P6 didn't care all
that much (although it would have preferred the decode
rules - but Intel cared much more about P4 code than code
for old chips they no longer sold). But the P4 did care.

Really. Just compare the optimization manuals. It's
quite clear. These days Intel suggests you use as many of
the complex addressing modes and combined ops as possible,
but that's a 180-degree change from the P4 days.

The P4 also had its own additional rules (often around the
slow shifter - avoid constant shifts and multiplies, use
long sequences of "lea" instructions if at all possible).

And the P4 rules actually *really* sucked if the code was
not in the trace cache, because then the P4 would be almost
entirely decode-limited (only one instruction per cycle),
so the "long sequence of 'lea' instead of a shift" was
actally exactly the wrong thing to do.

So in reality, the P4 rules were much more subtle, but
they were impossible to really get right, so you had some
code (usually tight loops) that ran like a bat out of hell,
and anything that didn't fit in the trace cache (or took
any of the myriad of microfaults) was slower than molasses.

Linus
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
AMD's Mobile StrategyMark Pillsbury2011/12/14 06:58 PM
  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Daniel Bizo2011/12/15 05:30 AM
    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Foo_2011/12/15 06:08 AM
    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV an2011/12/15 06:25 AM
      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Azazel2011/12/15 09:50 PM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Mike C2011/12/22 02:14 PM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Michael S2011/12/23 07:06 AM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Mike C2011/12/23 08:07 PM
    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/15 07:46 AM
      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/15 10:32 AM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV a person2011/12/15 10:59 AM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Michael S2011/12/15 11:18 AM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anon2011/12/16 07:22 PM
            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/17 06:56 AM
              Thumb vs ARM instruction countsnone2011/12/17 11:15 AM
                Thumb vs ARM instruction countsWilco2011/12/22 07:50 AM
                  Thumb vs ARM instruction countsExophase2011/12/22 08:56 AM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/15 11:44 AM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/15 03:24 PM
            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/15 04:15 PM
              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/15 04:51 PM
                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anon2011/12/15 05:32 PM
                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV David Kanter2011/12/15 06:57 PM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anon2011/12/15 08:58 PM
                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/16 12:27 AM
                    Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Paul A. Clayton2011/12/15 09:20 PM
                      Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Linus Torvalds2011/12/16 12:09 PM
                        Is scalar x86 decode that easy?EduardoS2011/12/17 10:03 AM
                        Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Ricardo B2011/12/17 02:21 PM
                          Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Megol2011/12/18 05:23 AM
                            Is scalar x86 decode that easy?rwessel2011/12/18 10:04 AM
                              Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Megol2011/12/18 10:38 AM
                              Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Linus Torvalds2011/12/18 12:15 PM
                                Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Ricardo B2011/12/18 01:57 PM
                                  Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Linus Torvalds2011/12/18 02:49 PM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/16 12:00 AM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anon2011/12/17 12:13 PM
                      Conditional comparesMichael S2011/12/17 01:05 PM
                        Conditional comparesEduardoS2011/12/17 01:32 PM
                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/15 05:56 PM
                  ARM free to innovate?Paul A. Clayton2011/12/15 09:14 PM
                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/16 10:01 AM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/16 02:33 PM
                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/16 06:30 PM
                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV rwessel2011/12/17 12:51 AM
                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Octoploid2011/12/17 07:46 AM
                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/17 10:56 AM
                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/17 07:45 AM
                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/17 11:31 AM
                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anon2011/12/21 09:12 AM
                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV David Kanter2011/12/17 02:16 PM
                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/17 03:30 PM
                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV none2011/12/17 05:00 PM
                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/17 05:29 PM
                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/17 05:45 PM
                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 10:24 AM
                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/20 01:07 PM
                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 07:19 PM
                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV EduardoS2011/12/20 07:40 PM
                                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 08:02 PM
                                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/20 08:49 PM
                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 08:59 PM
                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Michael S2011/12/21 03:49 AM
                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 10:10 AM
                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV gallier22011/12/21 06:41 AM
                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/21 07:43 AM
                                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Seni2011/12/21 09:28 AM
                                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/21 11:59 AM
                                              Cortex A9 latenciesS. Rao2011/12/21 09:12 PM
                                                Cortex A9 latenciesWilco2011/12/22 04:59 AM
                                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV gallier22011/12/22 01:25 AM
                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 09:42 AM
                                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV gallier22011/12/22 02:02 AM
                                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/22 05:44 AM
                                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV gallier22011/12/22 07:57 AM
                                    (in)visibility of ISA featureshobold2011/12/21 06:27 AM
                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/20 07:51 PM
                                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 08:13 PM
                                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV EduardoS2011/12/20 08:41 PM
                                    second to that (NT)Michael S2011/12/21 02:37 AM
                                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/20 09:03 PM
                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 11:05 PM
                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Seni2011/12/21 02:22 AM
                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 09:28 AM
                                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Seni2011/12/21 10:06 AM
                                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 10:33 AM
                                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Seni2011/12/21 11:03 AM
                                                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 11:33 AM
                                                  Adding modes for flexible imm. sizesPaul A. Clayton2011/12/21 04:08 PM
                                                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anonymous2011/12/21 10:57 PM
                                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 11:12 PM
                                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anonymous2011/12/22 02:27 AM
                                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/22 08:27 AM
                                                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Brett2011/12/21 11:36 PM
                                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/21 05:34 PM
                                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Seni2011/12/21 06:53 PM
                                                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/22 06:42 AM
                                                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV David Kanter2011/12/22 05:29 PM
                                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/22 07:17 PM
                                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV David Kanter2011/12/22 08:23 PM
                                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/22 09:27 PM
                                                          Confused by AVX....David Kanter2011/12/23 12:05 AM
                                                            Celeron, PentiumMichael S2011/12/23 01:15 AM
                                                            Confused by AVX....S. Rao2011/12/23 01:27 AM
                                                            Confused by AVX....Gabriele Svelto2011/12/23 01:33 AM
                                                              Confused by AVX....David Kanter2011/12/23 12:58 PM
                                                                Confused by AVX....Gabriele Svelto2011/12/23 02:44 PM
                                      Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Michael S2011/12/21 02:55 AM
                                        Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Wilco2011/12/21 08:35 AM
                                          Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Brett2011/12/22 12:20 AM
                                            Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Exophase2011/12/22 08:32 AM
                                              Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)iz2011/12/22 05:45 PM
                                        Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Exophase2011/12/21 09:34 AM
                                          Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Wilco2011/12/21 04:29 PM
                                            Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Exophase2011/12/22 08:37 AM
                                              Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Brett2011/12/22 11:59 PM
                                          Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Konrad Schwarz2011/12/27 05:07 AM
                                        Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)stubar2011/12/21 03:00 PM
                                          Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Exophase2011/12/21 03:25 PM
                                            Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Wilco2011/12/21 04:30 PM
                                              Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)anon2011/12/21 09:20 PM
                                                Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Wilco2011/12/22 05:50 AM
                                                  Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)anon2011/12/22 06:11 AM
                                                    Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Wilco2011/12/22 07:25 AM
                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/21 08:18 PM
                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/22 06:07 AM
                                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/22 10:56 AM
                                            idle philosophizing about localityhobold2011/12/23 08:26 AM
                                              Streaming needs regularity, not locality (NT)Rohit2011/12/23 01:32 PM
                                                Streaming needs regularity, not localityiz2011/12/24 12:38 AM
                                                Streaming needs regularity, not localityhobold2011/12/24 04:49 AM
                                                  Streaming needs regularity, not localityRohit2011/12/24 08:52 AM
                                                  Streaming needs regularity, not localityEBFE2011/12/25 06:30 PM
                                                    Streaming needs regularity, not localityRohit2011/12/25 09:42 PM
                                                      Streaming needs regularity, not localityEBFE2011/12/25 11:49 PM
                                                        Streaming needs regularity, not localityRohit2011/12/26 09:53 AM
                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV mpx2011/12/21 02:57 AM
                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV John Yates2011/12/26 10:46 AM
                                        Apollo Computer's DN10KBrett2011/12/26 06:56 PM
                                          Apollo Computer's DN10Kpeter huisken2011/12/27 07:40 AM
                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV gallier22011/12/21 06:56 AM
                              ALU with shift; post-adjust, memcpyMichael S2011/12/21 03:22 AM
                                ALU with shift; post-adjust, memcpyExophase2011/12/21 09:02 AM
                                  memcpyMichael S2011/12/21 10:36 AM
                                    memcpyExophase2011/12/21 11:15 AM
                                    memcpyWilco2011/12/21 06:06 PM
                                      memcpyanon2011/12/21 09:15 PM
                                      memcpyMichael S2011/12/22 12:12 AM
                                        memcpyWilco2011/12/22 06:20 AM
                          Other x86 uop tricksDavid Kanter2011/12/20 07:21 PM
                            Other x86 uop tricksanon2011/12/20 07:35 PM
                              Other x86 uop tricksMichael S2011/12/21 03:55 AM
                            Other x86 uop tricksanon2011/12/20 07:53 PM
                            Other x86 uop tricksExophase2011/12/20 07:54 PM
                      stwxMichael S2011/12/17 10:46 AM
                        stwxWilco2011/12/17 11:33 AM
                          stwxMichael S2011/12/17 01:12 PM
            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV mpx2011/12/16 11:06 AM
              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/16 11:17 AM
                Reason for shared decoderPaul A. Clayton2011/12/16 11:45 AM
                  Reason for shared decoderanon2011/12/16 06:37 PM
                    Reason for shared decodermpx2011/12/17 06:20 AM
                      Reason for shared decoderanon2011/12/17 04:19 PM
                        Reason for shared decodermpx2011/12/18 07:21 AM
                          Reason for shared decoderanon2011/12/18 08:30 AM
                          Reason for shared decoderKira2011/12/18 09:00 PM
                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV mpx2011/12/17 05:40 AM
                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/17 12:06 PM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV mpx2011/12/17 03:17 PM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/16 12:10 AM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV David Kanter2011/12/16 04:19 AM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/16 10:14 AM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Eugene Nalimov2011/12/16 11:07 AM
            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Michael S2011/12/18 07:25 AM
              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/18 12:48 PM
                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Michael S2011/12/18 04:01 PM
                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/18 05:21 PM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/18 07:56 PM
      x86 compatibility is not as important as Microsoft compatibilityBrett2011/12/15 08:13 PM
      You're completley missing the pictureDaniel Bizo2011/12/16 08:12 AM
        Missed referencesDaniel Bizo2011/12/16 08:16 AM
          Missed referencesnone2011/12/16 09:17 AM
            Missed referencesDaniel Bizo2011/12/16 09:29 AM
    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Gabriele Svelto2011/12/15 12:55 PM
    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV someone2011/12/15 01:19 PM
  AMD's Mobile StrategyDavid Kanter2011/12/15 06:13 PM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyMark Pillsbury2011/12/15 08:14 PM
      AMD's Mobile Strategybakaneko2011/12/15 08:57 PM
      AMD's Mobile StrategyDavid Kanter2011/12/15 10:53 PM
    AMD's new GPU ISA less efficient?Paul A. Clayton2011/12/15 08:33 PM
      AMD's new GPU ISA less efficient?bakaneko2011/12/15 09:03 PM
      AMD's new GPU ISA less efficient?Rohit2011/12/15 09:09 PM
  AMD's Mobile StrategyIan Ollmann2011/12/16 09:21 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyMegol2011/12/16 09:33 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyDan Fay2011/12/16 07:02 PM
      AMD's Mobile StrategyMichael S2011/12/17 09:22 AM
        AMD's Mobile StrategyMegol2011/12/17 10:10 AM
          AMD's Mobile StrategyWilco2011/12/17 11:18 AM
        AMD's Mobile StrategyDan Fay2011/12/17 11:45 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyEduardoS2011/12/17 07:43 AM
      AMD's Mobile StrategyMichael S2011/12/17 11:55 AM
  AMD's Mobile StrategyBill Henkel2011/12/16 06:54 PM
    6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorTom P2011/12/19 07:48 PM
      6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorBill Henkel2011/12/19 08:21 PM
        6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorgallier22011/12/20 01:31 AM
          "Benefit" of smaller market sharePaul A. Clayton2011/12/20 09:45 AM
            scalability of flash SSDSeni2011/12/20 11:22 AM
              USB drive price-point practical?Paul A. Clayton2011/12/20 12:49 PM
                USB drive price-point practical?Seni2011/12/20 02:02 PM
                  A minor comment on utilityPaul A. Clayton2011/12/20 03:19 PM
                    A minor comment on utilitySeni2011/12/20 03:35 PM
                    A minor comment on utilityFoo_2011/12/21 07:06 AM
                      100" Big screen.pH72011/12/26 12:37 PM
                USB drive price-point practical?David Hess2011/12/20 05:25 PM
                  USB drive price-point practical?iz2011/12/20 06:08 PM
                    USB drive price-point practical?David Hess2011/12/21 07:54 AM
                      USB drive price-point practical?iz2011/12/21 11:21 PM
                  USB drive price-point practical?Ungo2011/12/20 06:36 PM
                    USB drive price-point practical?David Hess2011/12/21 07:48 AM
              scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/20 03:50 PM
                scalability of flash SSDSeni2011/12/20 06:41 PM
                  scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/20 06:50 PM
                    scalability of flash SSDSeni2011/12/20 07:24 PM
                      scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/20 07:51 PM
                        scalability of flash SSDanon2011/12/21 04:03 AM
                          scalability of flash SSDanon2011/12/21 05:21 AM
                            scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/21 01:32 PM
                              scalability of flash SSDanon2011/12/21 03:49 PM
                                scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/21 04:58 PM
                                  scalability of flash SSDanon2011/12/21 09:00 PM
                                    scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/22 02:58 AM
                                    scalability of flash SSDRicardo B2011/12/22 08:36 AM
              scalability of flash SSDWes Felter2011/12/20 05:53 PM
                scalability of flash SSDSeni2011/12/20 06:24 PM
                scalability of flash SSDiz2011/12/20 06:29 PM
        6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorExophase2011/12/20 09:05 AM
          6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorEduardoS2011/12/20 03:58 PM
            6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorExophase2011/12/20 06:13 PM
              6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorEduardoS2011/12/20 06:43 PM
                6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorExophase2011/12/21 11:36 AM
                  6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorSeni2011/12/21 12:11 PM
                    6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorExophase2011/12/21 12:26 PM
                  Diatomic Helium? (NT)Paul A. Clayton2011/12/21 03:50 PM
                    Sorry, should have read further in thread! (NT)Paul A. Clayton2011/12/21 03:52 PM
      6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorsomeone2011/12/20 10:09 AM
        Per-core licensing fees.mpx2011/12/21 03:07 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyDoug Siebert2011/12/20 06:39 PM
  AMD's Mobile Strategy (NT)yundy2011/12/16 09:19 PM
  ARM transition is irrelevant from an economic POV Azazel2011/12/18 12:23 AM
  AMD's Mobile Strategypk2011/12/21 07:51 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyDavid Kanter2011/12/21 10:55 AM
      Samsung's fab technologyMark Roulo2011/12/21 11:34 AM
      AMD's Mobile StrategyAzazel2011/12/21 09:45 PM
        AMD's Mobile StrategyEduardoS2011/12/22 02:59 AM
          AMD's Mobile StrategyAzazel2011/12/22 10:03 PM
            AMD's Mobile StrategyEduardoS2011/12/22 11:51 PM
            AMD's Mobile StrategyVincent Diepeveen2011/12/24 11:15 AM
  AMD's Mobile StrategyAndrew Maizels2011/12/21 11:30 AM
  AMD's Mobile StrategyMr. Camel2011/12/27 09:50 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyMike C2011/12/27 11:01 PM
  Need for DifferentiationBill Henkel2011/12/29 12:22 PM
    Need for DifferentiationBrett2011/12/29 09:53 PM
      Need for DifferentiationVincent Diepeveen2011/12/30 11:29 AM
      Requested software features already in productCharles2011/12/30 09:35 PM
        Requested software features already in productSanjay B2012/01/11 04:45 PM
          Requested software features already in productBrett2012/01/11 10:18 PM
    Need for DifferentiationDavid Kanter2011/12/30 01:23 AM
      Need for DifferentiationVincent Diepeveen2011/12/30 11:17 AM
      Need for DifferentiationBill Henkel2012/01/03 07:01 PM
        Need for DifferentiationDavid Kanter2012/01/03 08:34 PM
    Need for DifferentiationVincent Diepeveen2011/12/30 11:09 AM
    L4 CacheBill Henkel2011/12/30 05:55 PM
      L4 CacheDavid Kanter2011/12/30 09:34 PM
        L4 CacheEduardoS2011/12/31 03:42 PM
          L4 CacheExophase2011/12/31 05:37 PM
      Need for speedDoug Siebert2011/12/31 01:07 PM
        Need for speedAlex M2012/01/06 03:38 PM
          Need for speedDoug Siebert2012/01/06 07:51 PM
        Need for speedTom J2012/01/10 04:44 PM
          Need for speedrwessel2012/01/10 05:30 PM
      L4 CacheRicardo B2011/12/31 02:25 PM
        L4 CacheBill Henkel2012/01/03 06:33 PM
          L4 CacheDavid Kanter2012/01/03 08:54 PM
            L4 Cache--not quite that bad?Paul A. Clayton2012/01/04 01:10 PM
              L4 Cache--not quite that bad?David Kanter2012/01/04 04:59 PM
                L4 Cache--not so bad (for Intel/IBM perhaps)Paul A. Clayton2012/01/04 08:01 PM
                L4 CacheBill Henkel2012/01/05 05:50 PM
                  Integration class price/performance tradeoffs?Paul A. Clayton2012/01/06 03:26 PM
                    Integration class price/performance tradeoffs?David Kanter2012/01/06 06:29 PM
                      InterposersMark Roulo2012/01/09 09:43 AM
                        InterposersDavid Kanter2012/01/10 12:13 PM
                    Integration class price/performance tradeoffs?Bill Henkel2012/01/06 06:52 PM
                      Beware of invention-stealing time travelers :-)Paul A. Clayton2012/01/06 08:31 PM
                        AMD PrototypePoindexter2012/01/07 06:20 AM
                    L4 Cache with Silicon InterposerTom J2012/01/08 05:50 PM
              L4 Cache--not quite that bad?rwessel2012/01/04 07:20 PM
                Temptation for expensive optimizationsPaul A. Clayton2012/01/04 08:20 PM
            L4 CacheDan Fay2012/01/04 05:51 PM
              L4 CacheRicardo B2012/01/04 06:39 PM
                L4 CacheDan Fay2012/01/04 06:57 PM
              L4 CacheKevin G2012/01/06 09:02 AM
          L4 CacheRicardo B2012/01/04 06:29 PM
            L4 CacheMichael S2012/01/05 07:21 AM
              L4 CacheRicardo B2012/01/05 11:01 AM
              L4 CacheRicardo B2012/01/06 06:06 AM
                L4 CacheMichael S2012/01/06 07:35 AM
                  Non-latency advantagesPaul A. Clayton2012/01/06 03:04 PM
                    Non-latency advantagesRicardo B2012/01/06 06:12 PM
                      Tag check delay??Paul A. Clayton2012/01/06 07:05 PM
                        Tag check delay??Ricardo B2012/01/06 08:18 PM
                          Thanks for sharingPaul A. Clayton2012/01/06 08:46 PM
            L4 Cachesomeone2012/01/08 05:06 PM
              L4 CacheRicardo B2012/01/08 06:28 PM
      L4 CacheVincent Diepeveen2012/01/08 02:11 PM
        L4 CacheJouni Osmala2012/01/09 03:24 AM
  Value of x86 in ServersGeorge Baker2012/01/04 10:55 AM
    Value of x86 in ServersDavid Kanter2012/01/05 02:40 AM
      Value of x86 in Serversrwessel2012/01/05 03:27 AM
        Value of x86 in ServersDavid Kanter2012/01/05 04:49 AM
      Value of x86 in ServersKira2012/01/09 05:22 PM
        Value of x86 in ServersJoel2012/01/09 09:20 PM
    Value of x86 in ServersDan Fay2012/01/05 09:03 AM
    Value of x86 in ServersAlex M2012/01/06 04:23 PM
    Value of x86 in ServersTom J2012/01/10 04:25 PM
      Value of x86 in Serversanon2012/01/11 12:44 PM
        Value of x86 in ServersGregory2012/01/12 06:11 PM
          x86 complexity or high-performance complexity?Paul A. Clayton2012/01/12 06:52 PM
          Value of x86 in ServersMichael S2012/01/13 06:39 AM
            Value of x86 in ServersRicardo B2012/01/13 03:14 PM
              Value of x86 in ServersMichael S2012/01/14 12:22 PM
  Heterogeneous ComputingAlex M2012/01/06 05:10 AM
    Thoughput != SIMDPaul A. Clayton2012/01/06 05:10 PM
  AMD's Processor StrategyJason Chan2012/01/10 06:06 AM
    AMD's Processor StrategyMark Roulo2012/01/10 06:21 PM
      AMD's Processor StrategyMegol2012/01/11 03:51 AM
        AMD's Processor StrategyDavid Hess2012/01/11 10:46 AM
    AMD's Processor StrategyAzazel2012/01/12 09:46 PM
      AMD's Processor StrategyVincent Diepeveen2012/01/13 06:28 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell purple?