Article: AMD's Mobile Strategy
By: mpx (mpx.delete@this.nomail.pl), December 21, 2011 3:07 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
someone (someone@somewhere.com) on 12/20/11 wrote:
---------------------------
>IBM sells a quad core 45 nm processor running at 5.2 GHz
>so a 6 GHz dual core is quite possible. Maybe even running
>under 200W if you use a decent 32 nm process.
Intel sells Xeon X5698 running at 4.4GHz with 2 cores and 12MB cache. This is not for desktop users, but for thosue who have to pay per-core licensing fees!
It's based on Westmere achitecture, that has quite high cache latencies. Sandy Bridge seems to be stuck at about 4GHz, probably because of low-latency design.
---------------------------
>IBM sells a quad core 45 nm processor running at 5.2 GHz
>so a 6 GHz dual core is quite possible. Maybe even running
>under 200W if you use a decent 32 nm process.
Intel sells Xeon X5698 running at 4.4GHz with 2 cores and 12MB cache. This is not for desktop users, but for thosue who have to pay per-core licensing fees!
It's based on Westmere achitecture, that has quite high cache latencies. Sandy Bridge seems to be stuck at about 4GHz, probably because of low-latency design.
