L4 Cache--not so bad (for Intel/IBM perhaps)

Article: AMD's Mobile Strategy
By: Paul A. Clayton (paaronclayton.delete@this.gmail.com), January 4, 2012 8:01 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 1/4/12 wrote:
---------------------------
>Paul A. Clayton (paaronclayton@gmail.com) on 1/4/12 wrote:
>---------------------------
[snip using nested page table for tagging]

>What happens if you want to use virtualization then?

Several options would be available. One option would be
changing the VMM to handle replacement itself or to use
paravirtualization over the firmware. Another option
would be to treat the VMM as a mere guest.

AMD probably could not afford either option since it does
not have the power to urge VMM providers to make changes
and AMD probably could not afford the loss in performance
of virtualization (even though page table changes are not
that common).

[snip on-processor chip filter]
>That would require a ton of space, I think the coverage
>ratio is around 6X. So for a 256MB cache, you'd need a
>42MB array for snoop filter entries.

Full tagging for a 256 MiB 16-way 64B block cache of a 64 GiB (one socket, possibly one memory channel) memory would
only require 6 MiB (4 Mi Entries * 12 bits per entry), so
a filter should have much smaller requirements.

[snip]
>I don't think you can fit the tags and snoop filter in the
>L3, which is a real problem for latency and power.

One might move some of the snoop filter onto the L4 chip.
This might be especially appropriate if that chip also
provides coherence links to remote sockets.

[snip]
>IBM has moved away from that entirely on their big systems
>and moved the memory controllers on-die, while still
>having external caches. I suspect there's a reason for
>that.

I thought IBM used on-board buffer chips. This would be
roughly comparable to integrating the buffer chips into
the MCM.

My guess would be that the latency advantage of more direct
access to memory trumped the bandwidth advantage. POWER5
also used on-chip tags, IIRC (which was practical given
IBM's more finely targeted market), so having separate
interfaces might not be so horrible. I think POWER chips
also have a higher pin count than x86 servers, so the
balance point of adding more pins versus sacrificing some
latency might be very different.

[snip]
>I was thinking about the difference cache sizes (for >servera and desktop, and the no L4 variant).

A trivial method of supporting two cache size variants
would be to provide different block sizes for desktop
and server variants--assuming tags were on the processor
chip which may not be desirable anyway.

>>Move it off-chip, reuse page tables, or use L3 data space.
>
>Not enough L3 space for tags and snoop filtering.

It might be practical and even desirable to move some of
the snoop filter into the L4 chip. E.g., a large-grained
filter (which might be much smaller and filter out many
requests) might fit on the processor chip with the L4 chip
providing more precise filtering.

>>Use L4 pins for accessing memory as well.
>
>But then you need another set of pins to get to DRAM,
>which adds more power (and latency).

This should not add more power than an on-board buffer
chip and might actually reduce typical power use even
relative to a similarly integrated buffer chip by avoiding
some memory accesses (and some precharge/activate events in
DRAMS). This power use would also be more broadly
distributed spatially.

[snip]
>Yeah, I think DRAM makes more sense too.

Some degree of hybridization might be sensible (e.g.,
partial or full tags in SRAM), but that is just a guess.

[snip]
>There's also the design resources. Why would you work on
>such a niche product when you could improve future
>Bulldozer or Bobcat cores and help all their products?

If a tightly integrated memory is inevitable, it might be
worthwhile to sacrifice some early benefit for a more
timely introduction of the next step in integration.

Of course, this also adds more risk--which is bad for AMD since it does not have a capital reserve to get through
more lean years.

On the slightly positive side, the design effort might be
mostly independent; i.e., little complexity would be added
to other parts of the design.

>>If the L4 was purely local (which might not be bad for
>>some workloads on 4+ socket systems [e.g., virtualization
>>workloads?] and might be quite decent for most 2 socket
>>system workloads), no snoop filter extension would be
>>necessary.
>
>How do you manage coherency?

I may need to think about this more deeply, but I was
assuming that a local-only L4 cache would be the same as a
statistically faster memory.

[snip]
>Yes, I agree with you there.

With AMD not being able to afford the high fixed cost of
developing MCM technology? Or also that AMD would benefit
from a differentiating factor?

[snip]
>What do you mean by heterogeneous multi-core? Like ARM's
>big.little? Or special purpose accelerators, or what?

I was thinking more like big.LITTLE, but not restricting
the use of the weak cores to low-power modes (ARM has
indicated that simultaneous use will be supported, but the
emphasis has been on alternating use). Some degree of
variety in microarchitecture beyond power efficiency might
be useful, but even limited variation around two basic
microarchitectures might be too expensive in design
resources for AMD. However, AMD probably could afford to
maintain two core designs with perhaps a ratio of 3:2 in
count (with more small cores). (It might even be practical
to reserve one small core as a service processor in some
server systems.)

While special purpose accelerators have some efficiency
attraction, such are more difficult to justify for general
purpose systems. Some cryptographic and compression/
decompression acceleration might be sufficiently universal
to justify for all systems above the low-end. I suspect
that integration of some chipset features may have a
justifiable higher priority. Anyway, I was only thinking
about same ISA cores.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
AMD's Mobile StrategyMark Pillsbury2011/12/14 06:58 PM
  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Daniel Bizo2011/12/15 05:30 AM
    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Foo_2011/12/15 06:08 AM
    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV an2011/12/15 06:25 AM
      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Azazel2011/12/15 09:50 PM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Mike C2011/12/22 02:14 PM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Michael S2011/12/23 07:06 AM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Mike C2011/12/23 08:07 PM
    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/15 07:46 AM
      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/15 10:32 AM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV a person2011/12/15 10:59 AM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Michael S2011/12/15 11:18 AM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anon2011/12/16 07:22 PM
            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/17 06:56 AM
              Thumb vs ARM instruction countsnone2011/12/17 11:15 AM
                Thumb vs ARM instruction countsWilco2011/12/22 07:50 AM
                  Thumb vs ARM instruction countsExophase2011/12/22 08:56 AM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/15 11:44 AM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/15 03:24 PM
            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/15 04:15 PM
              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/15 04:51 PM
                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anon2011/12/15 05:32 PM
                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV David Kanter2011/12/15 06:57 PM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anon2011/12/15 08:58 PM
                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/16 12:27 AM
                    Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Paul A. Clayton2011/12/15 09:20 PM
                      Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Linus Torvalds2011/12/16 12:09 PM
                        Is scalar x86 decode that easy?EduardoS2011/12/17 10:03 AM
                        Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Ricardo B2011/12/17 02:21 PM
                          Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Megol2011/12/18 05:23 AM
                            Is scalar x86 decode that easy?rwessel2011/12/18 10:04 AM
                              Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Megol2011/12/18 10:38 AM
                              Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Linus Torvalds2011/12/18 12:15 PM
                                Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Ricardo B2011/12/18 01:57 PM
                                  Is scalar x86 decode that easy?Linus Torvalds2011/12/18 02:49 PM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/16 12:00 AM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anon2011/12/17 12:13 PM
                      Conditional comparesMichael S2011/12/17 01:05 PM
                        Conditional comparesEduardoS2011/12/17 01:32 PM
                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/15 05:56 PM
                  ARM free to innovate?Paul A. Clayton2011/12/15 09:14 PM
                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/16 10:01 AM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/16 02:33 PM
                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/16 06:30 PM
                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV rwessel2011/12/17 12:51 AM
                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Octoploid2011/12/17 07:46 AM
                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/17 10:56 AM
                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/17 07:45 AM
                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/17 11:31 AM
                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anon2011/12/21 09:12 AM
                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV David Kanter2011/12/17 02:16 PM
                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/17 03:30 PM
                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV none2011/12/17 05:00 PM
                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/17 05:29 PM
                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/17 05:45 PM
                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 10:24 AM
                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/20 01:07 PM
                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 07:19 PM
                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV EduardoS2011/12/20 07:40 PM
                                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 08:02 PM
                                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/20 08:49 PM
                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 08:59 PM
                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Michael S2011/12/21 03:49 AM
                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 10:10 AM
                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV gallier22011/12/21 06:41 AM
                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/21 07:43 AM
                                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Seni2011/12/21 09:28 AM
                                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/21 11:59 AM
                                              Cortex A9 latenciesS. Rao2011/12/21 09:12 PM
                                                Cortex A9 latenciesWilco2011/12/22 04:59 AM
                                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV gallier22011/12/22 01:25 AM
                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 09:42 AM
                                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV gallier22011/12/22 02:02 AM
                                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/22 05:44 AM
                                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV gallier22011/12/22 07:57 AM
                                    (in)visibility of ISA featureshobold2011/12/21 06:27 AM
                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/20 07:51 PM
                                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 08:13 PM
                                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV EduardoS2011/12/20 08:41 PM
                                    second to that (NT)Michael S2011/12/21 02:37 AM
                                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/20 09:03 PM
                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/20 11:05 PM
                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Seni2011/12/21 02:22 AM
                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 09:28 AM
                                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Seni2011/12/21 10:06 AM
                                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 10:33 AM
                                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Seni2011/12/21 11:03 AM
                                                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 11:33 AM
                                                  Adding modes for flexible imm. sizesPaul A. Clayton2011/12/21 04:08 PM
                                                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anonymous2011/12/21 10:57 PM
                                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/21 11:12 PM
                                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV anonymous2011/12/22 02:27 AM
                                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/22 08:27 AM
                                                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Brett2011/12/21 11:36 PM
                                            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/21 05:34 PM
                                              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Seni2011/12/21 06:53 PM
                                                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/22 06:42 AM
                                                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV David Kanter2011/12/22 05:29 PM
                                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/22 07:17 PM
                                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV David Kanter2011/12/22 08:23 PM
                                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Exophase2011/12/22 09:27 PM
                                                          Confused by AVX....David Kanter2011/12/23 12:05 AM
                                                            Celeron, PentiumMichael S2011/12/23 01:15 AM
                                                            Confused by AVX....S. Rao2011/12/23 01:27 AM
                                                            Confused by AVX....Gabriele Svelto2011/12/23 01:33 AM
                                                              Confused by AVX....David Kanter2011/12/23 12:58 PM
                                                                Confused by AVX....Gabriele Svelto2011/12/23 02:44 PM
                                      Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Michael S2011/12/21 02:55 AM
                                        Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Wilco2011/12/21 08:35 AM
                                          Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Brett2011/12/22 12:20 AM
                                            Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Exophase2011/12/22 08:32 AM
                                              Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)iz2011/12/22 05:45 PM
                                        Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Exophase2011/12/21 09:34 AM
                                          Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Wilco2011/12/21 04:29 PM
                                            Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Exophase2011/12/22 08:37 AM
                                              Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Brett2011/12/22 11:59 PM
                                          Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Konrad Schwarz2011/12/27 05:07 AM
                                        Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)stubar2011/12/21 03:00 PM
                                          Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Exophase2011/12/21 03:25 PM
                                            Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Wilco2011/12/21 04:30 PM
                                              Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)anon2011/12/21 09:20 PM
                                                Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Wilco2011/12/22 05:50 AM
                                                  Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)anon2011/12/22 06:11 AM
                                                    Load Single Register (pc-relative, literal load)Wilco2011/12/22 07:25 AM
                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/21 08:18 PM
                                        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/22 06:07 AM
                                          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/22 10:56 AM
                                            idle philosophizing about localityhobold2011/12/23 08:26 AM
                                              Streaming needs regularity, not locality (NT)Rohit2011/12/23 01:32 PM
                                                Streaming needs regularity, not localityiz2011/12/24 12:38 AM
                                                Streaming needs regularity, not localityhobold2011/12/24 04:49 AM
                                                  Streaming needs regularity, not localityRohit2011/12/24 08:52 AM
                                                  Streaming needs regularity, not localityEBFE2011/12/25 06:30 PM
                                                    Streaming needs regularity, not localityRohit2011/12/25 09:42 PM
                                                      Streaming needs regularity, not localityEBFE2011/12/25 11:49 PM
                                                        Streaming needs regularity, not localityRohit2011/12/26 09:53 AM
                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV mpx2011/12/21 02:57 AM
                                      ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV John Yates2011/12/26 10:46 AM
                                        Apollo Computer's DN10KBrett2011/12/26 06:56 PM
                                          Apollo Computer's DN10Kpeter huisken2011/12/27 07:40 AM
                                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV gallier22011/12/21 06:56 AM
                              ALU with shift; post-adjust, memcpyMichael S2011/12/21 03:22 AM
                                ALU with shift; post-adjust, memcpyExophase2011/12/21 09:02 AM
                                  memcpyMichael S2011/12/21 10:36 AM
                                    memcpyExophase2011/12/21 11:15 AM
                                    memcpyWilco2011/12/21 06:06 PM
                                      memcpyanon2011/12/21 09:15 PM
                                      memcpyMichael S2011/12/22 12:12 AM
                                        memcpyWilco2011/12/22 06:20 AM
                          Other x86 uop tricksDavid Kanter2011/12/20 07:21 PM
                            Other x86 uop tricksanon2011/12/20 07:35 PM
                              Other x86 uop tricksMichael S2011/12/21 03:55 AM
                            Other x86 uop tricksanon2011/12/20 07:53 PM
                            Other x86 uop tricksExophase2011/12/20 07:54 PM
                      stwxMichael S2011/12/17 10:46 AM
                        stwxWilco2011/12/17 11:33 AM
                          stwxMichael S2011/12/17 01:12 PM
            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV mpx2011/12/16 11:06 AM
              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/16 11:17 AM
                Reason for shared decoderPaul A. Clayton2011/12/16 11:45 AM
                  Reason for shared decoderanon2011/12/16 06:37 PM
                    Reason for shared decodermpx2011/12/17 06:20 AM
                      Reason for shared decoderanon2011/12/17 04:19 PM
                        Reason for shared decodermpx2011/12/18 07:21 AM
                          Reason for shared decoderanon2011/12/18 08:30 AM
                          Reason for shared decoderKira2011/12/18 09:00 PM
                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV mpx2011/12/17 05:40 AM
                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/17 12:06 PM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV mpx2011/12/17 03:17 PM
        ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Wilco2011/12/16 12:10 AM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV David Kanter2011/12/16 04:19 AM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/16 10:14 AM
          ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Eugene Nalimov2011/12/16 11:07 AM
            ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Michael S2011/12/18 07:25 AM
              ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/18 12:48 PM
                ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Michael S2011/12/18 04:01 PM
                  ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/18 05:21 PM
                    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Linus Torvalds2011/12/18 07:56 PM
      x86 compatibility is not as important as Microsoft compatibilityBrett2011/12/15 08:13 PM
      You're completley missing the pictureDaniel Bizo2011/12/16 08:12 AM
        Missed referencesDaniel Bizo2011/12/16 08:16 AM
          Missed referencesnone2011/12/16 09:17 AM
            Missed referencesDaniel Bizo2011/12/16 09:29 AM
    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV Gabriele Svelto2011/12/15 12:55 PM
    ARM vs. x86 is irrelevant from an energy efficiency POV someone2011/12/15 01:19 PM
  AMD's Mobile StrategyDavid Kanter2011/12/15 06:13 PM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyMark Pillsbury2011/12/15 08:14 PM
      AMD's Mobile Strategybakaneko2011/12/15 08:57 PM
      AMD's Mobile StrategyDavid Kanter2011/12/15 10:53 PM
    AMD's new GPU ISA less efficient?Paul A. Clayton2011/12/15 08:33 PM
      AMD's new GPU ISA less efficient?bakaneko2011/12/15 09:03 PM
      AMD's new GPU ISA less efficient?Rohit2011/12/15 09:09 PM
  AMD's Mobile StrategyIan Ollmann2011/12/16 09:21 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyMegol2011/12/16 09:33 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyDan Fay2011/12/16 07:02 PM
      AMD's Mobile StrategyMichael S2011/12/17 09:22 AM
        AMD's Mobile StrategyMegol2011/12/17 10:10 AM
          AMD's Mobile StrategyWilco2011/12/17 11:18 AM
        AMD's Mobile StrategyDan Fay2011/12/17 11:45 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyEduardoS2011/12/17 07:43 AM
      AMD's Mobile StrategyMichael S2011/12/17 11:55 AM
  AMD's Mobile StrategyBill Henkel2011/12/16 06:54 PM
    6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorTom P2011/12/19 07:48 PM
      6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorBill Henkel2011/12/19 08:21 PM
        6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorgallier22011/12/20 01:31 AM
          "Benefit" of smaller market sharePaul A. Clayton2011/12/20 09:45 AM
            scalability of flash SSDSeni2011/12/20 11:22 AM
              USB drive price-point practical?Paul A. Clayton2011/12/20 12:49 PM
                USB drive price-point practical?Seni2011/12/20 02:02 PM
                  A minor comment on utilityPaul A. Clayton2011/12/20 03:19 PM
                    A minor comment on utilitySeni2011/12/20 03:35 PM
                    A minor comment on utilityFoo_2011/12/21 07:06 AM
                      100" Big screen.pH72011/12/26 12:37 PM
                USB drive price-point practical?David Hess2011/12/20 05:25 PM
                  USB drive price-point practical?iz2011/12/20 06:08 PM
                    USB drive price-point practical?David Hess2011/12/21 07:54 AM
                      USB drive price-point practical?iz2011/12/21 11:21 PM
                  USB drive price-point practical?Ungo2011/12/20 06:36 PM
                    USB drive price-point practical?David Hess2011/12/21 07:48 AM
              scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/20 03:50 PM
                scalability of flash SSDSeni2011/12/20 06:41 PM
                  scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/20 06:50 PM
                    scalability of flash SSDSeni2011/12/20 07:24 PM
                      scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/20 07:51 PM
                        scalability of flash SSDanon2011/12/21 04:03 AM
                          scalability of flash SSDanon2011/12/21 05:21 AM
                            scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/21 01:32 PM
                              scalability of flash SSDanon2011/12/21 03:49 PM
                                scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/21 04:58 PM
                                  scalability of flash SSDanon2011/12/21 09:00 PM
                                    scalability of flash SSDEduardoS2011/12/22 02:58 AM
                                    scalability of flash SSDRicardo B2011/12/22 08:36 AM
              scalability of flash SSDWes Felter2011/12/20 05:53 PM
                scalability of flash SSDSeni2011/12/20 06:24 PM
                scalability of flash SSDiz2011/12/20 06:29 PM
        6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorExophase2011/12/20 09:05 AM
          6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorEduardoS2011/12/20 03:58 PM
            6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorExophase2011/12/20 06:13 PM
              6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorEduardoS2011/12/20 06:43 PM
                6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorExophase2011/12/21 11:36 AM
                  6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorSeni2011/12/21 12:11 PM
                    6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorExophase2011/12/21 12:26 PM
                  Diatomic Helium? (NT)Paul A. Clayton2011/12/21 03:50 PM
                    Sorry, should have read further in thread! (NT)Paul A. Clayton2011/12/21 03:52 PM
      6 GHz 2-core water-cooled processorsomeone2011/12/20 10:09 AM
        Per-core licensing fees.mpx2011/12/21 03:07 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyDoug Siebert2011/12/20 06:39 PM
  AMD's Mobile Strategy (NT)yundy2011/12/16 09:19 PM
  ARM transition is irrelevant from an economic POV Azazel2011/12/18 12:23 AM
  AMD's Mobile Strategypk2011/12/21 07:51 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyDavid Kanter2011/12/21 10:55 AM
      Samsung's fab technologyMark Roulo2011/12/21 11:34 AM
      AMD's Mobile StrategyAzazel2011/12/21 09:45 PM
        AMD's Mobile StrategyEduardoS2011/12/22 02:59 AM
          AMD's Mobile StrategyAzazel2011/12/22 10:03 PM
            AMD's Mobile StrategyEduardoS2011/12/22 11:51 PM
            AMD's Mobile StrategyVincent Diepeveen2011/12/24 11:15 AM
  AMD's Mobile StrategyAndrew Maizels2011/12/21 11:30 AM
  AMD's Mobile StrategyMr. Camel2011/12/27 09:50 AM
    AMD's Mobile StrategyMike C2011/12/27 11:01 PM
  Need for DifferentiationBill Henkel2011/12/29 12:22 PM
    Need for DifferentiationBrett2011/12/29 09:53 PM
      Need for DifferentiationVincent Diepeveen2011/12/30 11:29 AM
      Requested software features already in productCharles2011/12/30 09:35 PM
        Requested software features already in productSanjay B2012/01/11 04:45 PM
          Requested software features already in productBrett2012/01/11 10:18 PM
    Need for DifferentiationDavid Kanter2011/12/30 01:23 AM
      Need for DifferentiationVincent Diepeveen2011/12/30 11:17 AM
      Need for DifferentiationBill Henkel2012/01/03 07:01 PM
        Need for DifferentiationDavid Kanter2012/01/03 08:34 PM
    Need for DifferentiationVincent Diepeveen2011/12/30 11:09 AM
    L4 CacheBill Henkel2011/12/30 05:55 PM
      L4 CacheDavid Kanter2011/12/30 09:34 PM
        L4 CacheEduardoS2011/12/31 03:42 PM
          L4 CacheExophase2011/12/31 05:37 PM
      Need for speedDoug Siebert2011/12/31 01:07 PM
        Need for speedAlex M2012/01/06 03:38 PM
          Need for speedDoug Siebert2012/01/06 07:51 PM
        Need for speedTom J2012/01/10 04:44 PM
          Need for speedrwessel2012/01/10 05:30 PM
      L4 CacheRicardo B2011/12/31 02:25 PM
        L4 CacheBill Henkel2012/01/03 06:33 PM
          L4 CacheDavid Kanter2012/01/03 08:54 PM
            L4 Cache--not quite that bad?Paul A. Clayton2012/01/04 01:10 PM
              L4 Cache--not quite that bad?David Kanter2012/01/04 04:59 PM
                L4 Cache--not so bad (for Intel/IBM perhaps)Paul A. Clayton2012/01/04 08:01 PM
                L4 CacheBill Henkel2012/01/05 05:50 PM
                  Integration class price/performance tradeoffs?Paul A. Clayton2012/01/06 03:26 PM
                    Integration class price/performance tradeoffs?David Kanter2012/01/06 06:29 PM
                      InterposersMark Roulo2012/01/09 09:43 AM
                        InterposersDavid Kanter2012/01/10 12:13 PM
                    Integration class price/performance tradeoffs?Bill Henkel2012/01/06 06:52 PM
                      Beware of invention-stealing time travelers :-)Paul A. Clayton2012/01/06 08:31 PM
                        AMD PrototypePoindexter2012/01/07 06:20 AM
                    L4 Cache with Silicon InterposerTom J2012/01/08 05:50 PM
              L4 Cache--not quite that bad?rwessel2012/01/04 07:20 PM
                Temptation for expensive optimizationsPaul A. Clayton2012/01/04 08:20 PM
            L4 CacheDan Fay2012/01/04 05:51 PM
              L4 CacheRicardo B2012/01/04 06:39 PM
                L4 CacheDan Fay2012/01/04 06:57 PM
              L4 CacheKevin G2012/01/06 09:02 AM
          L4 CacheRicardo B2012/01/04 06:29 PM
            L4 CacheMichael S2012/01/05 07:21 AM
              L4 CacheRicardo B2012/01/05 11:01 AM
              L4 CacheRicardo B2012/01/06 06:06 AM
                L4 CacheMichael S2012/01/06 07:35 AM
                  Non-latency advantagesPaul A. Clayton2012/01/06 03:04 PM
                    Non-latency advantagesRicardo B2012/01/06 06:12 PM
                      Tag check delay??Paul A. Clayton2012/01/06 07:05 PM
                        Tag check delay??Ricardo B2012/01/06 08:18 PM
                          Thanks for sharingPaul A. Clayton2012/01/06 08:46 PM
            L4 Cachesomeone2012/01/08 05:06 PM
              L4 CacheRicardo B2012/01/08 06:28 PM
      L4 CacheVincent Diepeveen2012/01/08 02:11 PM
        L4 CacheJouni Osmala2012/01/09 03:24 AM
  Value of x86 in ServersGeorge Baker2012/01/04 10:55 AM
    Value of x86 in ServersDavid Kanter2012/01/05 02:40 AM
      Value of x86 in Serversrwessel2012/01/05 03:27 AM
        Value of x86 in ServersDavid Kanter2012/01/05 04:49 AM
      Value of x86 in ServersKira2012/01/09 05:22 PM
        Value of x86 in ServersJoel2012/01/09 09:20 PM
    Value of x86 in ServersDan Fay2012/01/05 09:03 AM
    Value of x86 in ServersAlex M2012/01/06 04:23 PM
    Value of x86 in ServersTom J2012/01/10 04:25 PM
      Value of x86 in Serversanon2012/01/11 12:44 PM
        Value of x86 in ServersGregory2012/01/12 06:11 PM
          x86 complexity or high-performance complexity?Paul A. Clayton2012/01/12 06:52 PM
          Value of x86 in ServersMichael S2012/01/13 06:39 AM
            Value of x86 in ServersRicardo B2012/01/13 03:14 PM
              Value of x86 in ServersMichael S2012/01/14 12:22 PM
  Heterogeneous ComputingAlex M2012/01/06 05:10 AM
    Thoughput != SIMDPaul A. Clayton2012/01/06 05:10 PM
  AMD's Processor StrategyJason Chan2012/01/10 06:06 AM
    AMD's Processor StrategyMark Roulo2012/01/10 06:21 PM
      AMD's Processor StrategyMegol2012/01/11 03:51 AM
        AMD's Processor StrategyDavid Hess2012/01/11 10:46 AM
    AMD's Processor StrategyAzazel2012/01/12 09:46 PM
      AMD's Processor StrategyVincent Diepeveen2012/01/13 06:28 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell purple?