Article: AMD's Mobile Strategy
By: Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com), January 14, 2012 12:22 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Ricardo B (ricardo.b@xxxx.xx) on 1/13/12 wrote:
---------------------------
>Michael S (already5chosen@yahoo.com) on 1/13/12 wrote:
>---------------------------
>
>>Your analogy sucks, like all analogies.
>>Proper analogy would be: in many situations you doe use the same class of engines
>>(diesel) both in cars and in trains.
>
>Your analogy also sucks, like all analogies. :D
Well, nobody's perfect.
Still, my analogy sucks less than his.
>The diesel engines you find in a car (<300hp) are quite different from the diesel
>engines you'll find in a train (>800 hp even for light rail vehicles).
>Not only they're more powerfull, they're also rated to operate at high power for extensive periods.
Core i7-2677M and soon-coming Xeon E5 2687W are not the same either, despite sharing the same uArch.
---------------------------
>Michael S (already5chosen@yahoo.com) on 1/13/12 wrote:
>---------------------------
>
>>Your analogy sucks, like all analogies.
>>Proper analogy would be: in many situations you doe use the same class of engines
>>(diesel) both in cars and in trains.
>
>Your analogy also sucks, like all analogies. :D
Well, nobody's perfect.
Still, my analogy sucks less than his.
>The diesel engines you find in a car (<300hp) are quite different from the diesel
>engines you'll find in a train (>800 hp even for light rail vehicles).
>Not only they're more powerfull, they're also rated to operate at high power for extensive periods.
Core i7-2677M and soon-coming Xeon E5 2687W are not the same either, despite sharing the same uArch.