Article: AMD's Mobile Strategy
By: Mark Roulo (nothanks.delete@this.xxx.com), January 10, 2012 6:21 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Jason Chan (jchan@gmail.com) on 1/10/12 wrote:
---------------------------
>Bill Henkel on 12/29/11 wrote:
>---------------------------
>> For desktops and workstations, a differentiator could be
>> higher single thread performance rather than more cores
>> per socket (e.g. a 6 GHz dual-core water-cooled processor).
>
>The power consumption of a 6 GHz dual-core x86 processor would not need to be higher
>than Sandy Bridge-EP so water cooling would not be necessary. Suppose ...
There are probably a lot of issues with this, but one obvious one is heat/power *DENSITY*. Trying to pull 150 watts out of a 30 mm^2 die is probably quite a challenge.
I think that the PowerPC 970 had this problem ...
---------------------------
>Bill Henkel on 12/29/11 wrote:
>---------------------------
>> For desktops and workstations, a differentiator could be
>> higher single thread performance rather than more cores
>> per socket (e.g. a 6 GHz dual-core water-cooled processor).
>
>The power consumption of a 6 GHz dual-core x86 processor would not need to be higher
>than Sandy Bridge-EP so water cooling would not be necessary. Suppose ...
There are probably a lot of issues with this, but one obvious one is heat/power *DENSITY*. Trying to pull 150 watts out of a 30 mm^2 die is probably quite a challenge.
I think that the PowerPC 970 had this problem ...