Reply L2

Article: Analysis of Haswell's Transactional Memory
By: Moritz (better.delete@this.not.tell), March 1, 2012 2:20 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter ( on 2/27/12 wrote:
>are not many people who really deeply understand computer architecture. C't is a
>great magazine because the staff is fairly sophisticated.

The articles of AS were a big source for my discission to study microelectronics. They were the only source for new processor architecture details before I found this page. (Hans de Vries stopped in 2003)

>than macro. My feeling was that micro was well understood and the models seemed
>to work, whereas that wasn't the case for macro.

I agree, but also there is a lot of politics, conflict of interest and propaganda to it as well. Some things are understood, but get ignored because they do not support certain favored viewpoints.
I count the field to the somewhat unscientific descriptive / unmathematical sciences.
There is one big problem, unlike in longterm weather modeling which works real well, any forecast would change the true outcome. If they did have a model they would be restricted to validation by predicting the past with earlier data.
Any short-term predictions that are not obvious will never be possible as it is in the nature of the subject.

>Unfortunately, those who really
>understand economics are not often posting online.

Paul Krugman posts often.

>That's OK.

thank you
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
A bit about yourself [OT]Moritz2012/02/26 02:29 AM
  linkMoritz2012/02/26 02:40 AM
  A bit about yourself [OT]David Kanter2012/02/27 01:40 PM
    Reply L2Moritz2012/03/01 02:20 PM
  A bit about yourself [OT]lemuel2012/05/18 02:22 PM
  A bit about yourself [OT]kk2013/06/06 02:37 PM
  A bit about yourself [OT]Oliver S.2019/08/13 12:58 AM
    A bit about yourself [OT]David Kanter2019/08/13 08:55 AM
Reply to this Topic
Body: No Text
How do you spell tangerine? 🍊