Article: HP Wins Oracle Lawsuit
By: Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com), August 6, 2012 2:15 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on August 6, 2012 2:07 am wrote:
> Kira (kirsc.delete@this.aeterna.ru) on August 6, 2012 1:44 am wrote:
> >
>
> > And, to provide a counterpoint to the TPC-H (which is a
> > pretty
> grungy benchmark in a lot of ways), a 512GB 128-core Montecito Superdome
> >
> manages to be about 15% slower than a 1TB 256-core S64 VII 2.88GHz M9K on SAP
>
> > SD-2.
>
> That's simply not true. SAP-SD scores under old rules (2 sec
> latency) are not directly comparable to scores under new rules (1 sec
> latency).
>
To illustrate the effect of new reporting rules: two consecutive HP Nehalem submissions.
http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=D572BCCD2B192563572F68E04554632AFF2ECD46FA2B579C45FC0469C0F1379C99C40453761A2066
http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C0DCD4FC7250EF29D3829644CE4C28A5A1C573FBF6F0F9FAE
Old rules - 4995 Users
New rules - 3300 Users
> Kira (kirsc.delete@this.aeterna.ru) on August 6, 2012 1:44 am wrote:
> >
>
> > And, to provide a counterpoint to the TPC-H (which is a
> > pretty
> grungy benchmark in a lot of ways), a 512GB 128-core Montecito Superdome
> >
> manages to be about 15% slower than a 1TB 256-core S64 VII 2.88GHz M9K on SAP
>
> > SD-2.
>
> That's simply not true. SAP-SD scores under old rules (2 sec
> latency) are not directly comparable to scores under new rules (1 sec
> latency).
>
To illustrate the effect of new reporting rules: two consecutive HP Nehalem submissions.
http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=D572BCCD2B192563572F68E04554632AFF2ECD46FA2B579C45FC0469C0F1379C99C40453761A2066
http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C0DCD4FC7250EF29D3829644CE4C28A5A1C573FBF6F0F9FAE
Old rules - 4995 Users
New rules - 3300 Users