Article: HP Wins Oracle Lawsuit
By: Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com), August 7, 2012 1:17 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
EduardoS (no.delete@this.spam.com) on August 7, 2012 4:57 am wrote:
>
> Who is saying M4 is the same chip as T4? Maybe based on T4 but not the same chip, the convergence is on the
> roadmap for the future.
>
> Not being the same chip means it could have a different cache hierarchy as well as > 2-way.
>
2013 is too soon for a new core or for significantly different cache hierarchy. At max, they could increase the size of L3 cache. However SPARC T4 is already pretty big die so, assuming they keep the same # of cores, even L3 cache increase would not be easy.
More so, I'd expect them to reuse the same core micrarchitecture (except, possibly, LLC) in 16-core 28nm products that are planned for shipment in 2014.
>
> Who is saying M4 is the same chip as T4? Maybe based on T4 but not the same chip, the convergence is on the
> roadmap for the future.
>
> Not being the same chip means it could have a different cache hierarchy as well as > 2-way.
>
2013 is too soon for a new core or for significantly different cache hierarchy. At max, they could increase the size of L3 cache. However SPARC T4 is already pretty big die so, assuming they keep the same # of cores, even L3 cache increase would not be easy.
More so, I'd expect them to reuse the same core micrarchitecture (except, possibly, LLC) in 16-core 28nm products that are planned for shipment in 2014.
