Supercomputer variant of Kahan quote

Article: Intel's Near-Threshold Voltage Computing and Applications
By: Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com), October 17, 2012 5:56 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Robert Myers (rbmyersusa.delete@this.gmail.com) on October 17, 2012 4:34 am wrote:
> anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com) on October 17, 2012 1:17 am wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Exactly. This is why
> > low bandwidth, high latency memory and
> communications is not the problem, but
> > the *solution*. Together with
> caches and changed software assumptions, of
> > course.
> >
>
> Not to
> mention changed physics. If you can find an advanced physics text that
> ultimately does not lean heavily on the ability to go back and forth with
> facility between physical and momentum space (or whatever you choose to call it)
> using the transform that diagonalizes the momentum operator (the derivative),
> I'll be impressed. Since you seem to think that caches and changed software
> assumptions can address all problems of importance, you may have to be told
> explicitly that the transform in question is the Fourier transform. The last
> time I was paying close attention, Blue Gene could use all of 512 of its tens of
> thousands of processors effectively in doing a volumetric FFT. I'll say more
> later in the day.
>

According to my understanding, you are talking about IBM research paper from 9 years ago that investigated calculation of relatively tiny volumetric FFT (N=128, total dataset = 32 MB).
BG/Q of today is very different machine from BG/L of 2003. Today's tightly coupled 32-node "compute drawer" is almost as big, when measured by FLOPs, caches or memories, as 512-node BG/L from then. But the question is - why bother with parallelizing such small data set over so many loosely coupled computing elements?
Is it in same way similar to what you want to do? From one of our previous discussions on comp.arch I got the impression that you are interested in much bigger cubes that likely have very different scaling characteristic on BlueGene type of machines. And it's not obvious to me that their scaling characteristics are worse than small cube.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
New article: Intel's Near-Threshold ComputingDavid Kanter2012/09/18 11:26 AM
  Higher SRAM voltage and shared L1Paul A. Clayton2012/09/18 01:38 PM
    Higher SRAM voltage and shared L1David Kanter2012/09/18 04:20 PM
      Higher SRAM voltage and shared L1Eric2012/09/20 09:44 AM
        Higher SRAM voltage and shared L1David Kanter2012/09/20 11:24 AM
      Yes, that kind of asynchronousPaul A. Clayton2012/09/20 01:53 PM
    Higher SRAM voltage and shared L1somebody2012/09/19 08:27 AM
      So micro-turboboost is doubly impracticalPaul A. Clayton2012/09/20 01:53 PM
  Big littleDoug S2012/09/18 02:04 PM
    Big littleDavid Kanter2012/09/18 03:05 PM
    Big littleRicardo B2012/09/19 03:06 AM
  New article: Intel's Near-Threshold Computingdefderdar2012/09/18 08:39 PM
    New article: Intel's Near-Threshold Computingtarlinian2012/09/19 07:32 AM
      New article: Intel's Near-Threshold ComputingDavid Kanter2012/09/19 09:44 AM
  New article: Intel's Near-Threshold ComputingMark Christiansen2012/09/19 10:31 AM
    New article: Intel's Near-Threshold ComputingChris Brodersen2012/09/19 11:54 AM
  New article: Intel's Near-Threshold ComputingEric2012/09/20 09:47 AM
  Latency and HPC WorkloadsRobert Myers2012/10/03 09:52 AM
    Latency and HPC Workloadsanon2012/10/03 05:50 PM
      Latency and HPC WorkloadsRobert Myers2012/10/04 09:24 AM
        Latency and HPC WorkloadsSHK2012/10/08 04:42 AM
          Latency and HPC WorkloadsMichael S2012/10/08 12:59 PM
            Latency and HPC WorkloadsSHK2012/10/08 01:42 PM
              Latency and HPC WorkloadsMichael S2012/10/08 04:12 PM
                Latency and HPC Workloadsforestlaughing2012/10/15 07:41 AM
                  The original context was Micron RLDRAM (NT)Michael S2012/10/15 07:55 AM
                    The original context was Micron RLDRAMforestlaughing2012/10/15 09:21 AM
              Latency and HPC Workloads - Why not SRAM?Kevin G2012/10/09 08:48 AM
                Latency and HPC Workloads - Why not SRAM?Michael S2012/10/09 09:33 AM
                  Latency and HPC Workloads - Why not SRAM?SHK2012/10/09 11:55 AM
                    Why not SRAM? - CapacityRohit2012/10/09 08:13 PM
                  Latency and HPC Workloads - Why not SRAM?Kevin G2012/10/09 02:04 PM
                    Latency and HPC Workloads - Why not SRAM?Michael S2012/10/09 03:52 PM
                      Latency and HPC Workloads - Why not SRAM?Robert Myers2012/10/10 09:11 AM
                        Latency and HPC Workloads - Why not SRAM?forestlaughing2012/10/15 07:02 AM
                          Latency and HPC Workloads - Why not SRAM?Robert Myers2012/10/15 08:04 AM
                            Latency and HPC Workloads - Why not SRAM?forestlaughing2012/10/16 08:13 AM
                          Latency and HPC Workloads - Why not SRAM?SHK2012/10/16 07:12 AM
                    Latency and HPC Workloads - Why not SRAM?slacker2012/10/11 12:35 PM
                      SRAM leakageDavid Kanter2012/10/11 02:00 PM
          Latency and HPC Workloadsforestlaughing2012/10/15 07:57 AM
            Latency and HPC WorkloadsRobert Myers2012/10/16 06:28 AM
              Latency and HPC WorkloadsMichael S2012/10/16 06:35 AM
              Latency and HPC Workloadsanon2012/10/16 07:17 AM
                Latency and HPC WorkloadsRobert Myers2012/10/16 08:56 AM
                  Supercomputer variant of Kahan quotePaul A. Clayton2012/10/16 10:09 AM
                    Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/17 12:17 AM
                      Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/17 03:34 AM
                        Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/17 04:12 AM
                          Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/17 01:38 PM
                            Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/17 04:24 PM
                              Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/17 04:45 PM
                                Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/17 04:58 PM
                                Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/17 04:58 PM
                                  Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/17 06:14 PM
                                    Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/17 07:36 PM
                                      Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/18 08:47 AM
                                        Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/19 01:34 AM
                                          Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/19 03:47 AM
                                          Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/19 02:14 PM
                        Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteMichael S2012/10/17 05:56 PM
                          Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/17 08:02 PM
                            Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/18 12:29 PM
                              Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/19 01:27 AM
                                Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/19 06:24 AM
                                  Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/19 07:00 AM
                                    Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/19 08:28 AM
                                      Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteanon2012/10/19 09:27 AM
                              Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteforestlaughing2012/10/19 09:26 AM
                                Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/19 06:04 PM
                                  Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteEmil Briggs2012/10/20 03:52 AM
                                    Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/20 06:51 AM
                                      Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteEmil Briggs2012/10/20 07:33 AM
                                        Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteEmil Briggs2012/10/20 07:34 AM
                                          Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/20 08:35 AM
                                            Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteEmil Briggs2012/10/20 09:04 AM
                                              Supercomputer variant of Kahan quoteRobert Myers2012/10/20 10:23 AM
                  Latency and HPC Workloadsanon2012/10/16 05:48 PM
                    Latency and HPC Workloadsforestlaughing2012/10/19 10:43 AM
              Latency and HPC Workloadsforestlaughing2012/10/19 08:38 AM
                Latency and HPC WorkloadsRobert Myers2012/10/19 10:40 AM
                Potential false economics in researchPaul A. Clayton2012/10/19 11:54 AM
                  Potential false economics in researchVincent Diepeveen2012/10/20 07:59 AM
                  Potential false economics in researchforestlaughing2012/10/23 09:56 AM
                    Potential false economics in researchRobert Myers2012/10/23 06:16 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell green?