By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), November 13, 2012 3:43 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Intel’s Haswell CPU is the first core optimized for 22nm and includes a huge number of innovations for developers and users. New instructions for transactional memory, bit-manipulation, full 256-bit integer SIMD and floating point multiply-accumulate are combined in a microarchitecture that essentially doubles computational throughput and cache bandwidth. Most importantly, the microarchitecture was designed for efficiency and extends Intel’s offerings down to 10W tablets, while maintaining leadership for notebooks, desktops, servers and workstations.
http://www.realworldtech.com/haswell-cpu/
As always, comments, questions and feedback are encouraged.
DK
http://www.realworldtech.com/haswell-cpu/
As always, comments, questions and feedback are encouraged.
DK
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
Haswell CPU article online | David Kanter | 2012/11/13 03:43 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | Eric | 2012/11/13 04:10 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | hobold | 2012/11/13 05:13 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | Ricardo B | 2012/11/13 06:09 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | anonymou5 | 2012/11/13 05:44 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | none | 2012/11/14 03:40 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | tarlinian | 2012/11/13 04:56 PM |
Fixed (NT) | David Kanter | 2012/11/13 06:06 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | Jacob Marley | 2012/11/14 02:18 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | randomshinichi | 2012/11/14 02:53 AM |
LLC == Last Level Cache (usually L3) (NT) | Paul A. Clayton | 2012/11/14 05:50 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | Joe | 2012/11/14 10:38 AM |
LLC vs. L3 vs. L4 | David Kanter | 2012/11/14 11:09 AM |
LLC vs. L3 vs. L4; LLC = Link Layer Controller | Ray | 2012/11/14 10:08 PM |
A pit there are only 17000 TLAs... (NT) | EduardoS | 2012/11/15 03:14 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | anon | 2012/11/14 05:10 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Paul A. Clayton | 2012/11/14 06:41 AM |
That should be "mov R10 <- R9"! (NT) | Paul A. Clayton | 2012/11/14 06:43 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | anon | 2012/11/14 07:25 AM |
It does avoid the scheduler (NT) | Paul A. Clayton | 2012/11/14 08:47 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Stubabe | 2012/11/14 01:43 PM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | anon | 2012/11/14 09:33 PM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Felid | 2012/11/15 12:49 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | anon | 2012/11/15 01:23 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Stuart | 2012/11/15 05:04 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Stubabe | 2012/11/15 05:14 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | anon | 2012/11/15 05:48 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | EduardoS | 2012/11/15 06:00 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | anon | 2012/11/15 06:14 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | EduardoS | 2012/11/15 06:21 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | anon | 2012/11/15 06:31 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Stubabe | 2012/11/15 11:38 AM |
There can be only one dependence | Paul A. Clayton | 2012/11/15 12:50 PM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Felid | 2012/11/15 03:19 PM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | anon | 2012/11/16 04:07 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Felid | 2012/11/16 07:43 PM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Felid | 2012/11/15 02:50 PM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Felid | 2012/11/15 03:03 PM |
Correction! | Felid | 2012/11/19 01:23 AM |
Thanks, I wasn't aware of the change in SB. Good to know... (NT) | Stubabe | 2012/11/15 03:43 PM |
Move fusion assumes adjacency | Paul A. Clayton | 2012/11/15 07:15 AM |
Move fusion assumes adjacency | Felid | 2012/11/15 02:40 PM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Patrick Chase | 2012/11/21 11:52 AM |
Move elimination can be a µop fusion | Patrick Chase | 2012/11/21 12:12 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | Ricardo B | 2012/11/14 09:12 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | gmb | 2012/11/14 08:28 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | Felid | 2012/11/14 11:58 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | David Kanter | 2012/11/15 09:59 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | Felid | 2012/11/15 02:15 PM |
Instruction queue | David Kanter | 2012/11/16 12:23 PM |
Instruction queue | Felid | 2012/11/16 01:05 PM |
128-bit division unit? | Eric Bron | 2012/11/16 04:57 AM |
128-bit division unit? | David Kanter | 2012/11/16 08:59 AM |
128-bit division unit? | Eric Bron | 2012/11/16 09:47 AM |
128-bit division unit? | Felid | 2012/11/16 12:46 PM |
128-bit division unit? | Eric Bron | 2012/11/16 01:24 PM |
128-bit division unit? | Felid | 2012/11/16 07:19 PM |
128-bit division unit? | Eric Bron | 2012/11/18 08:41 AM |
128-bit division unit? | Michael S | 2012/11/17 12:50 PM |
128-bit division unit? | Felid | 2012/11/17 01:44 PM |
128-bit division unit? | Michael S | 2012/11/17 02:45 PM |
128-bit division unit? | Felid | 2012/11/17 05:49 PM |
128-bit division unit? | Michael S | 2012/11/17 06:56 PM |
128-bit division unit? | Eric Bron | 2012/11/18 08:35 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | Jim F | 2012/11/18 09:45 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | Gabriele Svelto | 2012/11/18 12:52 PM |
Probable bottleneck | Laurent Birtz | 2012/11/23 01:45 PM |
Probable bottleneck | EduardoS | 2012/11/23 01:58 PM |
Probable bottleneck | Laurent Birtz | 2012/11/24 10:10 AM |
Probable bottleneck | Stubabe | 2012/11/25 03:08 AM |
Probable bottleneck | EduardoS | 2012/11/25 08:15 AM |
Probable bottleneck | Stubabe | 2012/11/28 04:36 PM |
Urgh. Post got mangled by LESS THAN sign | Stubabe | 2012/11/28 04:41 PM |
Probable bottleneck | Laurent Birtz | 2012/11/29 08:34 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | Mr. Camel | 2012/11/28 03:47 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | EduardoS | 2012/11/28 04:06 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | Mr. Camel | 2012/11/28 07:23 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | EduardoS | 2012/11/28 07:27 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | Mr. Camel | 2012/12/12 01:39 PM |
Much faster iGPU clock ... | Mark Roulo | 2012/12/12 03:53 PM |
Much faster iGPU clock ... | Exophase | 2012/12/12 11:46 PM |
Much faster iGPU clock ... or not :-) | Mark Roulo | 2012/12/13 09:11 AM |
Much faster iGPU clock ... or not :-) | EduardoS | 2012/12/13 10:38 PM |
Much faster iGPU clock ... or not :-) | Michael S | 2012/12/14 05:33 AM |
Much faster iGPU clock ... or not :-) | EduardoS | 2012/12/14 07:06 AM |
Much faster iGPU clock ... or not :-) | Doug S | 2012/12/14 12:13 PM |
Much faster iGPU clock ... or not :-) | EduardoS | 2012/12/14 12:43 PM |
Much faster iGPU clock ... or not :-) | Mr. Camel | 2012/12/14 10:50 AM |
Much faster iGPU clock ... | Michael S | 2012/12/13 02:44 AM |
Much faster iGPU clock ... | Mark Roulo | 2012/12/13 09:09 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | Yang | 2012/12/09 08:28 PM |
possible spam bot? (NT) | I.S.T. | 2012/12/10 03:40 PM |
CPU Crystal Well behavior w/ eGPU? | Robert Williams | 2013/04/17 02:16 PM |
CPU Crystal Well behavior w/ eGPU? | Nicolas Capens | 2013/04/17 03:30 PM |
CPU Crystal Well behavior w/ eGPU? | RecessionCone | 2013/04/17 04:20 PM |
CPU Crystal Well behavior w/ eGPU? | Robert Williams | 2013/04/17 07:37 PM |
CPU Crystal Well behavior w/ eGPU? | Eric Bron | 2013/04/17 09:10 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | Sireesh | 2014/09/01 02:48 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | Maynard Handley | 2014/09/01 03:51 PM |
Great post | David Kanter | 2014/09/01 07:12 PM |
Thanks :) | Alberto | 2014/09/02 01:42 AM |
Thanks (NT) | Poindexter | 2014/09/02 09:31 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | EduardoS | 2014/09/01 04:21 PM |
Haswell CPU article online | Albert | 2015/10/06 01:48 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | Michael S | 2015/10/06 02:10 AM |
Haswell CPU article online | SHK | 2015/10/06 03:51 AM |