By: Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com), February 4, 2013 2:27 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Patrick Chase (patrickjchase.delete@this.gmail.com) on February 3, 2013 2:27 pm wrote:
>
> With that said, you gave me plenty of evidence yourself. R10K was >50% bigger for a 10% advantage
> in integer and a 50% advantage in FP.
50% in FP is for Spec95, I assume.
In Spec2k the difference was ALOT bigger - 2.4x.
I wonder why Spec2k and spec95 produce so different pictures?
R14K 500MHz 463
Pentium III 500 MHz 193
R14K specfp2k/Hz is not just better than P6, but x1.36 higher than much more advanced Intel Dothan
Pentium M 1600 MHz 1082
>
> With that said, you gave me plenty of evidence yourself. R10K was >50% bigger for a 10% advantage
> in integer and a 50% advantage in FP.
50% in FP is for Spec95, I assume.
In Spec2k the difference was ALOT bigger - 2.4x.
I wonder why Spec2k and spec95 produce so different pictures?
R14K 500MHz 463
Pentium III 500 MHz 193
R14K specfp2k/Hz is not just better than P6, but x1.36 higher than much more advanced Intel Dothan
Pentium M 1600 MHz 1082
