By: bakaneko (nyan.delete@this.hyan.wan), February 4, 2013 4:48 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on February 4, 2013 2:27 am wrote:
> Patrick Chase (patrickjchase.delete@this.gmail.com) on February 3, 2013 2:27 pm wrote:
> >
> > With that said, you gave me plenty of evidence yourself. R10K was >50% bigger for a 10% advantage
> > in integer and a 50% advantage in FP.
>
> 50% in FP is for Spec95, I assume.
> In Spec2k the difference was ALOT bigger - 2.4x.
> I wonder why Spec2k and spec95 produce so different pictures?
>
> R14K 500MHz 463
> Pentium III 500 MHz 193
>
> R14K specfp2k/Hz is not just better than P6, but x1.36 higher than much more advanced Intel Dothan
> Pentium M 1600 MHz 1082
>
>
What happened to the second and third link? 404 here.
> Patrick Chase (patrickjchase.delete@this.gmail.com) on February 3, 2013 2:27 pm wrote:
> >
> > With that said, you gave me plenty of evidence yourself. R10K was >50% bigger for a 10% advantage
> > in integer and a 50% advantage in FP.
>
> 50% in FP is for Spec95, I assume.
> In Spec2k the difference was ALOT bigger - 2.4x.
> I wonder why Spec2k and spec95 produce so different pictures?
>
> R14K 500MHz 463
> Pentium III 500 MHz 193
>
> R14K specfp2k/Hz is not just better than P6, but x1.36 higher than much more advanced Intel Dothan
> Pentium M 1600 MHz 1082
>
>
What happened to the second and third link? 404 here.