bakaneko (nyan.delete@this.hyan.wan) on February 4, 2013 4:48 am wrote:
> Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on February 4, 2013 2:27 am wrote:
> > Patrick Chase (patrickjchase.delete@this.gmail.com) on February 3, 2013 2:27 pm wrote:
> > >
> > > With that said, you gave me plenty of evidence yourself. R10K was >50% bigger for a 10% advantage
> > > in integer and a 50% advantage in FP.
> >
> > 50% in FP is for Spec95, I assume.
> > In Spec2k the difference was ALOT bigger - 2.4x.
> > I wonder why Spec2k and spec95 produce so different pictures?
> >
> > R14K 500MHz 463
> > Pentium III 500 MHz 193
> >
> > R14K specfp2k/Hz is not just better than P6, but x1.36 higher than much more advanced Intel Dothan
> > Pentium M 1600 MHz 1082
> >
> >
>
> What happened to the second and third link? 404 here.

Nothing special I screwed then up.

R14K 500MHz 463

Pentium III 500 MHz 193

Pentium M 1600 MH 1082