By: EduardoS (no.delete@this.spam.com), May 8, 2013 8:27 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Gabriele Svelto (gabriele.svelto.delete@this.gmail.com) on May 8, 2013 5:27 am wrote:
> Oracle demonstrated with the SPARC T4 that SMT can be beneficial for narrow architectures
> too though in their case SMT leverages a memory subsystem which has significantly
> higher latency and allows for many more concurrent accesses.
Oracle were targeting databases, a completly different workload from Atom or A15, no comparison is possible.
> Oracle demonstrated with the SPARC T4 that SMT can be beneficial for narrow architectures
> too though in their case SMT leverages a memory subsystem which has significantly
> higher latency and allows for many more concurrent accesses.
Oracle were targeting databases, a completly different workload from Atom or A15, no comparison is possible.
