By: Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com), July 2, 2013 5:40 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
EduardoS (no.delete@this.spam.com) on July 1, 2013 5:40 pm wrote:
> anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com) on July 1, 2013 12:32 am wrote:
> > None of your post provided any other real evidence or logic.
>
> Maybe bacause you do not understand math...
>
> > Intel doubled SIMD width in SandyBridge and had to redesign the pipeline to be PRF-based.
> >
> > So you think going to a PRF was pretty easy change?
>
> First, Intel didn't had to go PRF, they choose to go this way, AMD went PRF
> even without 256 bits registers, hell, AMD went PRF with 64 bits registers!
>
Which AMD core do you have in mind?
> anon (anon.delete@this.anon.com) on July 1, 2013 12:32 am wrote:
> > None of your post provided any other real evidence or logic.
>
> Maybe bacause you do not understand math...
>
> > Intel doubled SIMD width in SandyBridge and had to redesign the pipeline to be PRF-based.
> >
> > So you think going to a PRF was pretty easy change?
>
> First, Intel didn't had to go PRF, they choose to go this way, AMD went PRF
> even without 256 bits registers, hell, AMD went PRF with 64 bits registers!
>
Which AMD core do you have in mind?