By: none (none.delete@this.none.com), June 3, 2013 1:28 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Exophase (exophase.delete@this.gmail.com) on June 3, 2013 12:02 pm wrote:
> Wilco (Wilco.Dijkstra.delete@this.ntlworld.com) on June 3, 2013 10:52 am wrote:
> > On the other hand the only A15 implementation available until a few weeks ago
> > (Exynos 5250) is unlikely to be indicative of all A15 implementations.
>
> No, but it's better than the Silvermont hardware ARM has access to, which is nothing.
Some ARM direct or indirect customers probably have access to Silvermont or at least more accurate statements from Intel marketing than what was presented. Of course that doesn't mean that ARM slide is correct in any way.
> Wilco (Wilco.Dijkstra.delete@this.ntlworld.com) on June 3, 2013 10:52 am wrote:
> > On the other hand the only A15 implementation available until a few weeks ago
> > (Exynos 5250) is unlikely to be indicative of all A15 implementations.
>
> No, but it's better than the Silvermont hardware ARM has access to, which is nothing.
Some ARM direct or indirect customers probably have access to Silvermont or at least more accurate statements from Intel marketing than what was presented. Of course that doesn't mean that ARM slide is correct in any way.
