By: John (Jngu14.delete@this.gmail.com), June 8, 2013 6:28 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Jason (oxkct.delete@this.7tags.com) on June 7, 2013 1:56 pm wrote:
> I guess this explains why Samsung went with Intel over their own Exynos on the Galaxy
> Tab. Look at how the Lenovo K800 (Atom) compared to Galaxy S4 (Exynos/SnapDragon) :
>
> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20130607005475/en/Intel-Apps-Processor-Outperforms-NVIDIA-Qualcomm-Samsung
>
> http://mms.businesswire.com/media/20130607005475/en/371984/5/intel_chart.jpg?download=1
What the heck are they testing?
I can make a spreadsheet say anything I want. There are absolutely no details or methodology to those number. It is useless.
> I guess this explains why Samsung went with Intel over their own Exynos on the Galaxy
> Tab. Look at how the Lenovo K800 (Atom) compared to Galaxy S4 (Exynos/SnapDragon) :
>
> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20130607005475/en/Intel-Apps-Processor-Outperforms-NVIDIA-Qualcomm-Samsung
>
> http://mms.businesswire.com/media/20130607005475/en/371984/5/intel_chart.jpg?download=1
What the heck are they testing?
I can make a spreadsheet say anything I want. There are absolutely no details or methodology to those number. It is useless.